Upvote:6
What your instructor I think was trying to point you to is the old Hollywood troupe of Black Dude Dies First.
Films would take a Scary Black Man, turn him into The Big Guy, and kill him off to show how strong the monster is. In action or horror films, The Hero (typically a White Male Lead) might have a Black Best Friend Lancer that gets killed off or do a Heroic Sacrifice to show that this is no laughing matter. 80s horror shows were good at this, and film makers had growing backlash against all the exploitation films. Instead of the Token Minority being unimportant Cannon Fodder, they instead became the most important supporting character so their deaths would have most dramatic impact on the plot.
It was honestly only the last decade or so that I've started seeing movies that didn't do this to their black cast members. The only older movie I know of that bucked this was Night of the Living Dead, and that was a controversial decision.
What he seemingly didn't mention was the racial subtext of Rocky I. Yes, it was about a boxer, but was also about an average shmoe white boxer who ends up nearly beating the best professional boxer in the world, who was black just like most champion boxers of that day were.
This is a sport with a long tawdry history of black-white racial themes, and in particular white boxers being over-promoted based on their race and racist hopes of having a non-black title holder. A good read through the life story of champion Jack Johnson should give you an idea of how bad it can get.
The movie didn't try to overtly play up to that, but it was certainly cast that way. So its not really reasonable to view Rocky without keeping the racial history of boxing in mind. Rocky IV can be seen as kind of a way of transferring that familiar racial animosity to the US/Soviet tensions of the era.