Which was more revolutionary for its time: Television or Radio?

Upvote:3

I think Radio was more revolutionary - is was the first

  1. free (advertiser-paid)
  2. real time
  3. one-to-many
  4. not requiring any skills from the recipient (illiterates can listen)
  5. not requiring recipient to withdraw form menial tasks (one can work on a sewing machine while listening - TV actually does not have this feature!)

information distribution system.

The only "prior art" I can think of are medieval market-square announcers (heralds?), but they broadcast to a very limited audience.

In fact, it took about 20 years between the invention of radio and the start of public broadcasting - because the business model was not clear. TV was used for civilian broadcasts right away - without any period of "military-only technology".

In a way, the Radio/TV relationship is similar to the Telegraph/Telephone relationship. The first in each pair was a true revolution. The second was a crucial improvement.

Radio started public broadcasting. TV improved on it.

Telegraph started instant communications. Phone improved on it and made it a household item.

More post

Search Posts

Related post