Does Historiography have a usual technical term for historical writing which makes factual claims without giving references for them?

score:3

Accepted answer

You identify academic writing as that which has primary citations throughout. I would argue that references to secondary sources are fine too. Indeed, citation for specific claims is an important feature of scholarly historical writing.

Authors who write about history without the annotations produce works that are not very useful for further study. That is why scholarly texts always have copious citations. A term for the texts you want described is unscholarly or non-scholarly.

Check out a guide to distinguishing sources with an eye to distinguishing between the modes. NB that one hallmark of non-scholarly work is that it is written for a wide audience.

More post

Search Posts

Related post