Could the Russians Have Done Better at the Battle of Tsushima Straits Than They Actually Did?
score:36
It wasn't as simple as "13 against 4" as the question states.
Russians only had 8 real battleships. 3 were coastal defense Ushakov class battleships.
The entire order of battle was significantly less lopsided than the ratio above indicates. Even leaving aside ship quality, the quantity was (from Wiki)
| Japan | Russia | ================================================= | total: 89 ships | total: 28 ships | | 4 battleships | 8 battleships | | | 3 coastal battleships | | 9 armored cruisers | 4 armored cruisers | | 17 protected cruisers | 4 protected cruisers | | 21 destroyers | 9 destroyers | | 37 torpedo boats | | | plus gunboats | |Please note that protected cruisers didn't have armored belt around the ship, only an armored deck.
Now, if we go to guns, the quantitative difference gets even smaller:
| Russia | Japan | ======================================================================= | 26 x 12-in. | 16 x 12-in. | | 15 x 10-in. | 1 x 10-in. | | 2 x 9-in. | | | 6 x 8-in. | 30 x 8-in. | | 43 x 6-in. | 80 x 6-in. | | 92 guns/Total weight 32,090 lb. | 127 guns/Total weight 28,400 lb. |As you can see, Japanese actually had MORE guns, and only slightly less total firepower by combined weight.
Qualitatively, the most important difference was the ordinance. Japanese had high explosive shells, fused to explode on contact. They set fire to pretty much everything on Russian ships (including coal which due to the long voyage circumstances was being stored on deck); and severely damaged superstructures. Russians used armor piercing shells that actually caused LESS damage, especially to the crews. In addition, Russian fuses were unreliable (I saw estimates of as many as 1/3 not exploding).
Next up hardware wise was rangefinder.
Japanese fire was also more accurate because they were using the latest issued (1903) Barr & Stroud FA3 coincidence rangefinder, which had a range of 6,000 yards (5,500 m), while the Russian battleships were equipped with Liuzhol rangefinders from the 1880s, which only had a range of about 4,000 yards (3,700 m).
Basically, unless russians got into knife fighting range, they were out-shot, severely so. So, the answer to your question of could they have done MORE damage by charging straight ahead is "quite possible". However, the other factors listed here means that they probably would still have lost the battle.
Extremely important was experience. Not only Japanese were incredibly more trained (including gunnery practice), they also had several other battleship battles worth of experience by that time, which the Russians did not have.
So, the answer to the original question's "Why not charge line abreast", while not explicitly known, can very plausibly be "because the commanding officer(s) didn't have enough experience and talent to make that decision". Their only Admiral with practical experience of BB battles was killed in battle in Yellow Sea before Tsushima
A very important example of the officer experience was that Japanese concentrated their fire, extremely effectively using their shot weight parity and rate of fire advantage.
Intelligence. Togo's forces knew 100% precisely what the Russian ships' positions were, from long before the battle, thanks to their scouting cruisers. Russians didn't know they were about to be attacked till almost the start of battle.
Upvote:5
With a numerical superiority and a technical inferiority, would the Russians have done better to opt for a battle of attrition instead... perhaps using a line abreast formation?
They tried. At 12:15 in response to sighting real live Japanese torpedo boats, Rozhestvensky ordered his First Division battleships into line abreast. Imperator Aleksandr III turned the wrong way throwing the formation into chaos. Rozhestvensky canceled the order and returns to line ahead.
This has consequences for the entire battle. When firing begins, the Russian fleet is still trying to sort itself out from his botched maneuver. The lead battleships mask the trailing fleet. Oslyabya, leading the second squadron, has to come to an almost full stop to avoid colliding with the trailing ship of the first squadron, Oryol, and takes an almighty battering.
The 2nd Pacific Squadron could have done more to prepare and to avoid the battle entirely. The squadron was hastily assembled out of whatever ships were available at the time to break the siege of Port Arthur, but the port had fallen well before Tsushima. Their new objective was to reach Vladivostok and link up with the remaining ships there. After rest and repairs, the combined fleet could recommence operations against the Japanese. Now that the pressure of relieving Port Arthur was gone, haste was no longer necessary.
Supply more ammunition for practice
The 2nd Pacific Squadron was hastily assembled out of whatever ships were available at the time to break the siege of Port Arthur. Rozhestvensky was an experienced and effective leader, but his crews and subordinate commanders were not. They could have used the travel time to practice, but the squadron was supplied with limited ammunition which opportunities for training. Given this was the last throw of the dice for the Russians, this was a strange time to be stingy.
Leave the obsolete ships at home
Rozhestvensky was saddled with the slow and obsolete Third Division consisting of three coastal-defense ships and the even slower Imperator Nikolai I. These ships had little impact on the battle and only served to slow the fleet down. Their slow speed meant the Japanese could fight at their desired range. Without these ships, Rozhestvensky would have had more options. With these ships, once spotted he would be hard pressed to disengage from the Japanese.
Take a different route
With a need for haste gone, the 2nd Pacific Squadron could take its time reaching Vladivostok and avoiding battle in their dilapidated and divided state. They could have avoided the restricted waters of the Korea Strait and taken a longer route around the eastern side of the Japan. Rozhestvensky telegraphed his intentions when he dismissed his colliers; without them his ships had no choice but to go through the Korea Strait.
Use the Oryol as a ruse
The rules of war required the hospital ship Oryol to remain well lit at night. She was spotted the night before the battle by the Japanese auxiliary cruiser Shinano Maru who investigated and spotted more Russian ships nearby. Thus alerted, the Japanese began shadowing the Russian fleet.
Knowing the Oryol would have to remain lit at night, Rozhestvensky could have sent her off on her with some fast auxiliaries off on their own as a ruse.
React to the scouts
Long after it was clear they had been spotted, Rozhestvensky continued to maintain radio silence. Japanese scouts were allowed to shadow the Russians and radio reports back to their fleet with impunity. Visibility was poor, and had Rozhestvensky been aggressive against these scouts he may have been able to slip away.
More post
- 📝 How much did Israel pay the Libyan Flight 114 shootdown victims?
- 📝 What kind of radio equipment is depicted in this Vietnam era picture?
- 📝 Were medieval and renaissance era jesters commonly disabled?
- 📝 What was the source for Adam's children in the endnotes to Josephus' "The Antiquities of the Jews"?
- 📝 Were the Tuatha De Danann really from India?
- 📝 Polytheism and war
- 📝 Why didn't Chiang mention technological self-reliance?
- 📝 Was the pigment minium (lead oxide) named after the river Minus in Iberia?
- 📝 Was there a German embassy open in 1941 Lisbon?
- 📝 How long has western civilization known the body contains a significant fraction of water?
- 📝 Does Little Hagia sophia still contain Greek mosaics under the plaster?
- 📝 What was different about the "right" (recto) side of papyrus sheets compared to the other side?
- 📝 Did everyone have to carry identity papers in Nazi Germany?
- 📝 The nature of the Preliminary Articles of Peace of 1782
- 📝 Total budget of Nuremberg trial
- 📝 How, if at all, is published pseudohistory publicly addressed by scholars and academia?
- 📝 Who's this Egyptian woman?
- 📝 Do we know if Patton ever said "l'audace l'audace toujours l'audace"?
- 📝 Did the Great Wall of China help cause the fall of the Roman Empire?
- 📝 Was Hagia Sophia built over a pagan temple?
- 📝 What mistake did abbot [Jacques?] Delille make when eating an egg at the Court of Louis XVI?
- 📝 In WW2, how long could a submarine stay submerged if it wasn't moving?
- 📝 What did people die of in 1665 London?
- 📝 How did people realize that America was a different continent?
- 📝 What is "Egyptland" in the context of the 1960s black civil rights movement in the US?
- 📝 How did Edgar Allan Poe get promoted to Sergeant Major from Private in just 2 years?
- 📝 Were pregnant women regarded as particularly attractive in 19th century Europe?
- 📝 Did the German Enigma machine use multiple encryption keys?
- 📝 Post world war one mandates model
- 📝 Were there trains to anonymous concentration camps?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Could the Russians Have Done Better at the Battle of Tsushima Straits Than They Actually Did?
- 📝 Could the Confederates have done better at Gettysburg if they had put cavalry in front of, rather than behind, Pickett's charge?
- 📝 Could the anti-Napoleonic forces have done better by uniting earlier before Waterloo?
- 📝 What forces/incentives drove the Mongols to conquer a much larger territory than they could comfortably settle or rule?
- 📝 Did the Russian Empire have a claim to Sweden? Was there ever a time where they could have pursued it?
- 📝 Did the US military just kill more Russians in Syria than they ever did during the Cold War?
- 📝 Could the "Taffy" Groups have been reinforced by air during the battle of Leyte Gulf?
- 📝 On 1941 Dec 7, could Japan have targeted the Panama Canal instead of Pearl Harbor in a surprise attack?
- 📝 Why did the Confederacy think they could win the American Civil War?
- 📝 If the Union Jack joins the flag of England and Scotland, why does it have a different shade of blue than the Scottish flag?
- 📝 In the Battle of the Coral Sea, how could two Japanese scouts grossly mis-identify two American ships?
- 📝 Which countries (or comparable geographical units) have a lower population now than they used to at some point in history before 1950?
- 📝 Did the U.S. and Soviet Union have a submarine battle in 1968?
- 📝 Were there ethnic Russians in Alaska when the US purchased it 1867? Did they stay?
- 📝 Did Louis XIV actually say "The State? I am the State."? Could he have said it?
- 📝 Did they actually have "mushroom cloud tourist attraction" to Nevada Test Site in the 1950s?
- 📝 Could the Soviet Union have continued fighting World War II without Caucasus oil?
- 📝 Why did the German air force lose experienced pilots faster than the Allies, even though they were defending their home airspace?
- 📝 What reasons did the Confederacy have for believing they would have a quick victory?
- 📝 Could the Soviet Union have supported Czechoslovakia primarily by air in 1938?
- 📝 Did courtiers of antiquity hold in their pee or did they have common commodes available in the king/queen's court?
- 📝 Why did Argentina invade the Falklands when they did, rather than wait for the pending sale of the UK aircraft carriers to complete first?
- 📝 Why did the Germans build battle cruisers with a different profile than the British?
- 📝 Have the current polar ice caps receded further than those that existed before the beginning of the last Ice Age?
- 📝 At the Battle of Zama, was the Roman army more "native" than the Carthaginian?
- 📝 How was the naval battle of Guadalcanal affected by Japanese ships loading High Explosive shells rather than Armor Piercing?
- 📝 Did the Tlingits benefit from resisting the Russians more than other Alaskan tribes?
- 📝 Did Spain and the Republic of China (Kuomintang) have diplomatic relations between 1931 and 1939? Were they friendly or unfriendly?
- 📝 Why did Russians have guns towards the end of the Mongol Yoke, but not the Mongols?
- 📝 How did they measure speed in the 19th century so they could issue the first speeding ticket?