What was Justice Louis Brandeis's opinion on eugenics?

Upvote:2

It seems that Brandeis was sort of neutral on the issue. I found no evidence of his actively supporting eugenics (like: talking at eugenics congresses, authoring articles, or just using eugenics-loaded language of the sort of "Three generations of imbeciles are enough"). On the other hand, there is no apparent indication of him having any qualms about eugenics either.

Here is what his latest biographer, Jeffrey Rosen, has to say on the issue:

This is a reminder of a really dark part of our history which is that progressives - and even the progressive religious denominations - tended to be enthusiastic eugenicists. Holmes, Theodore Roosevelt - these are all - and Margaret Sanger - these are people who support the so-called perfection of the race. It's a small comfort that Brandeis, by all accounts, was not himself a eugenicist. There's no evidence of him supporting this as a policy matter.

He was a great believer in judicial deference to the states and state's rights as we've discussed. And this was a 8-to-1 decision. He seemed to silently be joining, what was at the time, legally uncontroversial. It's striking that the only dissenter in the Buck and Bell case, Pierce Butler, was a devout Catholic. And it was only more conservative Catholics, Jews and Protestants who opposed eugenics at the time.

Unfortunately, progressives were for it. So it's a shame that Brandeis joined this opinion, but at least unlike Holmes, there's no evidence that he himself supported the dreadful result in the case. Source

More post

Search Posts

Related post