Was Winston Churchill really responsible for the 1943 Bengal famine?
score:12
tl;dr
No, he wasn't, although it might be argued that he might have done more, had he been blessed with the gift of 20/20 hindsight (like his modern critics).
Indeed, as the historian Arthur Herman wrote:
“We might even say that Churchill indirectly broke the Bengal famine by appointing as Viceroy Field Marshal Wavell, who mobilised the military to transport food and aid to the stricken regions (something that hadn’t occurred to anyone, apparently).”
- [Quoted in Langworth, 2017, p150]
Origins of the claim
The claim that Churchill was responsible for the 1943 Bengal famine stems from the book Churchill's Secret War, By Madhusree Mukerjee.
The problem is that the evidence doesn't actually support that conclusion. On the contrary, it actually appears that Churchill did everything he could in the midst of a world war to save the Bengalis, and that without his actions the famine might have been worse.
Background to the Famine
There were undoubtedly a number of factors that came together to cause the 1943 Bengall famine. Many of these are covered in some detail in the Wikipedia article on the subject. It is also extremely difficult, if not impossible, to assign a definitive starting date to the actual onset of the famine. This is particularly true since different districts in Bengal suffered the effects at different times and to varying degrees. The Government of India dated the onset of full-scale famine to May 1943.
However, there is some uncertainty about quite how much was known in London, and when, about the severity of the famine. In his 1990 book, Bengal Tiger and British Lion: An Account of the Bengal Famine of 1943, Richard Stevenson laid a great deal of the blame at the door of the then Viceroy, Victor Hope, 2nd Marquess of Linlithgow. Certainly, the lack of reliable statistics does appear to have been a significant factor in the government's apparent reluctance to act earlier.
The Response of Churchill and the War Cabinet
What we do know is that in a report to the War Cabinet on 4 August 1943, the Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, noted the spread of famine in Bengal. In his briefing, he specifically stressed the effect upon Calcutta and the potential effect on the morale of European troops stationed in India. At this stage, the cabinet offered only a relatively small amount of additional food shipments. Indeed, they explicitly referred to it as "a token shipment".
Three weeks later, The Statesman newspaper published graphic images of starving famine victims in Calcutta, bringing the situation to the attention of the world. It was probably several weeks before copies of the newspaper reached London.
Churchill appointed Field Marshal, Lord Wavell as Viceroy and Governor of India on 1 October 1943. In briefing the cabinet on Wavell's appointment, Churchill stated that Wavell's duty was to:
"... make sure that India was a safe base for the great operations against Japan which were now pending, and that the war was pressed to a successful conclusion, and that famine and food difficulties were dealt with.”
- [War Cabinet, 7 October 1943, (Cabinet papers, CAB 65/36/4)]
He then wrote to Wavell:
"Peace, order and a high condition of war-time well-being among the masses of the people constitute the essential foundation of the forward thrust against the enemy ... The hard pressures of world-war have for the first time for many years brought conditions of scarcity, verging in some localities into actual famine, upon India. Every effort must be made, even by the diversion of shipping urgently needed for war purposes, to deal with local shortages….Every effort should be made by you to assuage the strife between the Hindus and Moslems and to induce them to work together for the common good."
He stated that the goal was to be:
“the best possible standard of living for the largest number of people.”
- [Winston S. Churchill to Members of the War Cabinet, 8 October 1943. (Churchill papers, 23/11)]
In terms of famine relief, Churchill initially urged Australia to provide assistance. In response, Australia promised to supply 350,000 tons of wheat.
The Canadian Prime Minister MacKenzie King, also offered to provide aid, but Churchill replied that:
“Wheat from Canada would take at least two months to reach India whereas it could be carried from Australia in 3 to 4 weeks.”
Winston S. Churchill to William Lyon Mackenzie King, 4 November 1943.
- [Prime Minister’s Personal Telegram T.1842/3 (Churchill papers, CHAR 20/123/52)].
In India, Viceroy Field Marshal Lord Wavell, then mobilised the military to transport food and other aid to the stricken areas.
When in 1944, the Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, requested a further one million tons of grain to ease the ongoing famine, Churchill stated that:
“for the four years ending 1941/42 the average consumption was 52,331,000 tons, i.e., 2½ million tons less than the figure cited by the Secretary of State. This difference would, of course, more than make good the 1½ million tons calculated deficit.”
Furthermore, he noted that diverting a further million tone of grain at that time would not be practicable:
“given the effect of its diversion alike on operations and on our imports of food into this country, which could be further reduced only at the cost of much suffering.”
- [War Cabinet, 7 February (Cabinet papers, CAB 65/41)].
One piece of evidence that is missing from most of the modern claims that Churchill was responsible for the famine is the observation made by the War Cabinet report that the shortages in Bengal had been:
“partly political in character, caused by Marwari supporters of Congress [Gandhi’s party] in an effort to embarrass the existing Muslim Government of Bengal.” Another cause, they added, was corrupt local officials: “The Government of India were unduly tender with speculators and hoarders.”
- [Ibid]
The speculation mentioned had arisen after the Japanese invasion of Burma in 1942 had cut off India’s main supply of rice imports.
Nonetheless, the records show that Churchill and the War Cabinet continued to do their best to divert available resources to provide assistance to India. Shipping remained one of the key problems, and the cabinet recommended that:
(a) A further diversion to India of the shipments of food grains destined for the Balkan stockpile in the Middle East. This might amount to 50,000 tons, but would need War Cabinet approval, while United States reactions would also have to be ascertained;
(b) There would be advantage if ships carrying military or civil cargo from the United States or Australia to India could also take a quantity of bagged wheat.
- [War Cabinet, 21 February 1944 (Cabinet papers, CAB 65/41)].
In April 1944, we know that Wavel was reporting that the situation in India was still dire. At this point, Churchill even wrote to President Roosevelt to ask for assistance:
I am seriously concerned about the food situation in India ... Last year we had a grievous famine in Bengal through which at least 700,000 people died. This year there is a good crop of rice, but we are faced with an acute shortage of wheat, aggravated by unprecedented storms ... By cutting down military shipments and other means, I have been able to arrange for 350,000 tons of wheat to be shipped to India from Australia during the first nine months of 1944. This is the shortest haul. I cannot see how to do more.
I have had much hesitation in asking you to add to the great assistance you are giving us with shipping but a satisfactory situation in India is of such vital importance to the success of our joint plans against the Japanese that I am impelled to ask you to consider a special allocation of ships to carry wheat to India from Australia ... We have the wheat (in Australia) but we lack the ships. I have resisted for some time the Viceroy’s request that I should ask you for your help, but ... I am no longer justified in not asking for your help.
Winston S. Churchill to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, 29 April 1944.
- [Prime Minister’s Personal Telegram T.996/4 (Churchill papers, 20/163)].
Roosevelt replied to Churchill saying that while he had his “utmost sympathy”, his Joint Chiefs had said they were:
“... unable on military grounds to consent to the diversion of shipping ... Needless to say, I regret exceedingly the necessity of giving you this unfavorable reply.”
Roosevelt to Churchill, 1 June 1944.
- [Prime Minister’s Personal Telegram T.1176/4 (Churchill papers, 20/165)].
Of course, it must be remembered that this was in the context of America's war against Japan in the Pacific and the build-up to D-Day in the European theatre.
Sources
Primary
National Archives usage guidance for Cabinet Papers.
Famine Inquiry Commission Report on Bengal, May 1945
Secondary
- Langworth, Richard M: Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said, McFarland, 2017
- Stevenson, Richard: Bengal Tiger and British Lion: An Account of the Bengal Famine of 1943, Lionheart Press, 1990
More post
- 📝 Language of early French (West-Frankish) kings
- 📝 Did Romans complain about sundials?
- 📝 Changes to the school leaving dates in Scotland and Northern Ireland
- 📝 Was the religious and cultural diversity a core structural cause of the Ottoman Empire's decline?
- 📝 How can we be confident that Tacitus really wrote his Histories and Annals?
- 📝 What language is this and what does it say?
- 📝 Why in English do we say "Tsar of all (the) Russias"?
- 📝 How were taxes collected for traveling merchants in the middle ages?
- 📝 Where does Akbar the Great's "Great" come from?
- 📝 What did "opening day" mean in the 18th century?
- 📝 Was the Second Industrial Revolution directly related to the first?
- 📝 How did silk manufacturing become a major industry in medieval Europe?
- 📝 Why did Henry III of England give his sons English names, other than naming them after his favourite saints?
- 📝 Why does the word "al-Ahmar" appear in the name of ibn al-Ahmar?
- 📝 Why was there an increase in literature regarding fire safety in America during the 1970s?
- 📝 Knights' coat of arms colors
- 📝 Where is the other surviving chest from the Boston Tea Party?
- 📝 What happened to the foreigners in Germany during the Nazis?
- 📝 Learning about WW2 lead me to a current event question about German policy
- 📝 Were there any top Nazi generals who opposed the idea to invade the USSR?
- 📝 Where can I find financial data for the first world war?
- 📝 What did Canadians use to pay for goods or services between 1871 and 1935?
- 📝 Why was William III of England referred to as the British-Batavian Nassau?
- 📝 Did foreign language phrase books exist in the ancient world?
- 📝 Was Kaaba initially a Shiva temple?
- 📝 Was electricity free in the Soviet Union?
- 📝 In what ways did the rise of a true middle class in Europe during the late 19th century become apparent?
- 📝 Why didn't Russia seize California when it could?
- 📝 History of native cultures in America
- 📝 What was a "Qua" in a "Subsidy of Armour" in 1590?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was Winston Churchill really responsible for the 1943 Bengal famine?
- 📝 Was Islam really responsible for the Italian Renaissance?
- 📝 Who was responsible for the partition of India?
- 📝 Was the Battle of Tours really the turning point for the Umayyad expansion into Europe?
- 📝 Why was Villa Gaggia chosen as the setting for Hitler & Mussolini's July 1943 meeting?
- 📝 How severe was the 1943 Bengal Famine?
- 📝 Was the German Empire responsible for the advancement of German technology?
- 📝 Was Operation Kugelblitz really a success for the partisans?
- 📝 Was the enclosure responsible for the supply of factory workers in 18th and 19th Century England?
- 📝 What was the name for a group of 12 men in old England responsible for each others actions?
- 📝 Was the money requested by the French for the XYZ affair really a bribe?
- 📝 Who on ship was responsible for purchases during the Age of Sail?
- 📝 Who was responsible for the murder of Elizabeth Short, AKA the Black Dahlia? Was it a doctor who was formerly married to a police captain's daughter?
- 📝 What was the role of Midnapore town in present day West Bengal of India in the armed struggle for freedom in Bengal province of British India?
- 📝 To what extent was Christianity responsible for the dark ages of Western Europe?
- 📝 Was the year 2000 a really peaceful time in history for the West?
- 📝 Was race really unimportant in the 1660's?
- 📝 During the breakup of the Soviet Union, on what basis was citizenship granted or withheld for each of the fifteen new republics?
- 📝 Was it militarily possible to "island hop" the Philippines if not for MacArthur?
- 📝 What was the reason for Soviet troops to withdraw from Yugoslavia in World War II?
- 📝 Was slavery really on the way out in the antebellum USA?
- 📝 If the Ch’in dynasty was so short-lived, why was China named for it?
- 📝 Is there evidence to suggest the "war on drugs" was a cover for class warfare?
- 📝 What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?
- 📝 What was the economic basis for West Berlin?
- 📝 Was there a tax in the fifties for British citizens traveling abroad?
- 📝 Was it ever possible to join the US military instead of going to prison for a crime?
- 📝 Was there really a navy officer named Picard at the Battle of Trafalgar?
- 📝 What was the planned line of succession for the Nazi Party in the event that Hitler died?
- 📝 Did Catherine the Great really call for the abolition of serfdom?