Were Tories "Catholics" and "Whigs" Anglican?
score:10
I was deeply suspicious of this simplistic view, but research quickly shows that it isn't completely absurd. In general, the Tories are the King's party and could be expected to support the King's position (which at the time was believed to be that England should return to Catholicism.) The Whigs offered less support to the crown. (the notion of an opposition party and a loyal opposition would not emerge for 100 years or more).
That's the simple view. Truth was, as it always is, more complex.
Despite the small number who could actually participate in the choice of representatives, political questions were hotly discussed among the upper classes, who were divided into two well-defined parties, Tories and Whigs. These owed their origin to the excitement of the Civil War, when those who supported Charles I were called Cavaliers and those who opposed him, Roundheads. During the latter years of Charles II, the former party, which upheld the divine right of kings and the supremacy of the Anglican Church, received the name of "Tory." Their opponents, who advocated the supremacy of Parliament and championed toleration for the Dissenters, came to be called Whigs. Outlines of European History
Note that the Tories supported the king, but an Anglican church; the Whigs supported greater toleration. Neither party is "Catholic", although given the choice, the Tories support an established church.
On the other hand,
When James II had forced the Tories to choose between their church and their king they could but choose their church. It was a Protestant and reformed church, the spiritual center of a civilization to which the alternative was a Bourbon Stuart civilization, having as its agent the priest, the dragoon, and the hangman, and its threatening outpost on England's western flank in barbarous Ireland. Great Britain Since 1688
The text is less well written, but the Tories chose a Protestant church over a despotic Catholic king; the tories explicitly reject the priest (catholicism)
A third source suggests (to me) an answer: these simplistic views were held by fanatical fringes on each side.
The two groups most displeased with the Revolution Settlement were the most ideologically opposed sects of Britons, Jacobite Tories who supported the exiled Catholic King James II and phanatick Covenanters who desired a powerful church protected by but powerful over the state Joseph Moore
Jacobite Tories did fit the definition. I think the exam oversimplifies a situation in a way which I find very sad. The glorious revolution is one of those peculiar events in history where we can be sure that the participants were just as confused about their roles as we are, and we can identify with their confusion, their passion, and their inability to escape a situation that did not tolerate passivity. The exam question erases all that, and makes them alien creatures with pre-determined opinions. (On my oath, I didn't spot the irony till I'd already finished the sentence.)
Upvote:2
You and the examiner were right to say 'false'. However, it's not a good fit for a true/false question.
In 1688, after the deposition of James II, the English parliament was divided in two groups, Tories and Whigs, whose political characteristics corresponded to the religious creed professed: Tories, conservatives, were Catholics; Whigs, liberals, were Anglicans.
Let's take these dichotomies one at a time.
Catholic/Anglican. The Whigs formed out of the Exclusionists, who wished to exclude the Catholic James II from succeeding his Anglican brother, Charles II. The Tories wished to keep James II as heir.
The Tories were not Catholics. Their two main principles were the divine right of kings, and pro-Church of England-ism. It's probable that any Catholics in England would have leaned towards the Tories, as the Whigs had nothing to offer them. However, the Tories as a group were Anglican. We could say that Catholics may have been relatively pro-Tory, but the Tories were definitely not pro-Catholic.
A few Tories probably joined or supported the Jacobites, but most of them resigned themselves to the rule of William of Orange after 1689, because William promised to preserve the independence of the Church of England from Rome (and did). Many were likely relieved, since it was feared James II would forcibly convert the country to Catholicism.
The Whigs were Anglicans, but more likely to favour toleration of Protestant dissenters, which they enacted in the Toleration Act when William came to power. William favoured extending toleration to Catholics as well, but the Whigs wouldn't let him, as they thought Catholics would use toleration as a cover to take over the country and kill people who wouldn't convert, per other European monarchs and Mary the I of England.
Conservative/Liberal. Where to start? Liberal like the Lib Dems, or the US Democrats, or the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party, or the German FDP, or William Gladstone, or... what?
For simplicity's sake, I'll assume the question refers to 19th century British liberalism: religious toleration, supremacy of parliament over the Crown, etc. So conservatism will be C-of-E-only-ism, and royal supremacy.
The Whigs favoured a more powerful parliament, and the Tories did not. To that extent the answer is clearly that the Whigs were more liberal.
In terms of religious toleration it's a bit more complicated. The Whigs favoured limited toleration for Protestant 'dissenters', including Quakers, etc. The Tories were against even this.
However, James II favoured toleration for all Christian denominations, including both Catholics and dissenters (see the 'Declaration of Indulgence'). Is it 'liberal' to depose a king who wants to extend toleration, and then to only extend it a tiny bit?
Upvote:5
For most of the time in question, Catholics were excluded from standing for, or even voting for, parliament. So there could not really be any opposition between Catholics and Protestants within parliament itself, as the cited question seems to imply.
More post
- 📝 Was game theory used during World War II?
- 📝 How severe was the 1943 Bengal Famine?
- 📝 Did people from the cities of Uruk, Ur and Sumer have knowledge/recollection of how old their cities were (say, recollection after 2000 BCE)?
- 📝 Did the Axis use Villa Cisneros during WW2 for contact with South America?
- 📝 How did Quebec transition from French Law to English Law?
- 📝 What title did the merchants permitted to deal with Canton's 13 Factories carry?
- 📝 What were the religious effects of the initial Arab conquests in the Byzantine Empire?
- 📝 Did any French generals or politicians argue for pressing the Saar offensive?
- 📝 Who or what is Glohithia
- 📝 When and where did socks become common?
- 📝 How long did a letter take from Quebec to Bordeaux in 1929?
- 📝 Why was there little nonwhite migration to Europe in the 19th century?
- 📝 When is Samonios in comparison to the Gregorian calendar?
- 📝 Have any nations returned to their ancient homelands?
- 📝 Where is Heinrich Martin Weber's grave located?
- 📝 Can anyone identify this coin found in Spain?
- 📝 How did the Poland-Lithuanian Commonwealth become official?
- 📝 Unknown Symbol on an Atomic Bomb
- 📝 What is the earliest archaeological evidence of silk presence in Ancient Rome?
- 📝 What was the ethnic composition of Soviet government?
- 📝 Why did the American South agree to the compromise of 1850?
- 📝 What is the largest overnight depreciation?
- 📝 Historical and biblical names for bottles of wine
- 📝 How did the Nazis justify the differences in the way they treated Jews v. POWs?
- 📝 What island in the Caspian sea did Ala Ad-Din Muhammad die on, after escaping Genghis Khan?
- 📝 Racism Amongst People of Germanic Ancestry in NAZI Germany
- 📝 Is there any economic history account of the role of Japan's precious metal deposits in the roles of the country's early industrialization?
- 📝 Where was the Temple of Onias located?
- 📝 Who standardized the Roman measurements?
- 📝 A source for Gerald Goodlake's exploit during the Crimean War
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Were Tories "Catholics" and "Whigs" Anglican?
- 📝 Why were old fortifications shaped like stars and not like circles?
- 📝 Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
- 📝 Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
- 📝 Why were Spain and Portugal neutral / not invaded in WWII?
- 📝 Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?
- 📝 In the "Christmas truce" of 1914 were there any football (soccer) matches between British and German troops?
- 📝 How were concentration and extermination camp guards recruited?
- 📝 Why were the drawings of Colossus burnt after WW2 and why was its very existence "of course" kept secret?
- 📝 How were drawbridges and portcullises used tactically?
- 📝 Why were British ships not of the same quality as French and Spanish ships until the latter part of the 18th century?
- 📝 How were the cities of Milan and Bruges spared by the Black Death?
- 📝 Why did Roosevelt and Churchill use voice-based telecommunication, instead of simpler text-based options which were easier to encrypt?
- 📝 Were there any Germans in Japan after the surrender of Germany in May, 1945 and if so, what happened to them?
- 📝 In WWII, what were the major differences in tank combat on the eastern and western fronts?
- 📝 Were there inns and hostels in medieval Europe?
- 📝 Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?
- 📝 How many lives were estimated to have been saved by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs?
- 📝 How were diplomats and their staffs treated when World War II was declared?
- 📝 What were the EMP effects, if any, of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 When and where were the first coins made showing the currency or a face value?
- 📝 Why were the Germans and Russians so fixated on an unlikely "separate peace" in 1945?
- 📝 How expensive were castles? And how were the costs distributed?
- 📝 Is it true that US tracer rounds were red and VC green during Vietnam war?
- 📝 What East German laws and regulations were extended to the West after unification?
- 📝 Why were La Réunion and Mauritius uninhabited?
- 📝 Where were ancient Romans supposed to dispose of their waste and garbage?
- 📝 Are there historical instances of settlers who were largely uncontacted and undisturbed after settling?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 What were the demographics and economics of South-East Asian islands around year 1400?