Were Tories "Catholics" and "Whigs" Anglican?
score:10
I was deeply suspicious of this simplistic view, but research quickly shows that it isn't completely absurd. In general, the Tories are the King's party and could be expected to support the King's position (which at the time was believed to be that England should return to Catholicism.) The Whigs offered less support to the crown. (the notion of an opposition party and a loyal opposition would not emerge for 100 years or more).
That's the simple view. Truth was, as it always is, more complex.
Despite the small number who could actually participate in the choice of representatives, political questions were hotly discussed among the upper classes, who were divided into two well-defined parties, Tories and Whigs. These owed their origin to the excitement of the Civil War, when those who supported Charles I were called Cavaliers and those who opposed him, Roundheads. During the latter years of Charles II, the former party, which upheld the divine right of kings and the supremacy of the Anglican Church, received the name of "Tory." Their opponents, who advocated the supremacy of Parliament and championed toleration for the Dissenters, came to be called Whigs. Outlines of European History
Note that the Tories supported the king, but an Anglican church; the Whigs supported greater toleration. Neither party is "Catholic", although given the choice, the Tories support an established church.
On the other hand,
When James II had forced the Tories to choose between their church and their king they could but choose their church. It was a Protestant and reformed church, the spiritual center of a civilization to which the alternative was a Bourbon Stuart civilization, having as its agent the priest, the dragoon, and the hangman, and its threatening outpost on England's western flank in barbarous Ireland. Great Britain Since 1688
The text is less well written, but the Tories chose a Protestant church over a despotic Catholic king; the tories explicitly reject the priest (catholicism)
A third source suggests (to me) an answer: these simplistic views were held by fanatical fringes on each side.
The two groups most displeased with the Revolution Settlement were the most ideologically opposed sects of Britons, Jacobite Tories who supported the exiled Catholic King James II and phanatick Covenanters who desired a powerful church protected by but powerful over the state Joseph Moore
Jacobite Tories did fit the definition. I think the exam oversimplifies a situation in a way which I find very sad. The glorious revolution is one of those peculiar events in history where we can be sure that the participants were just as confused about their roles as we are, and we can identify with their confusion, their passion, and their inability to escape a situation that did not tolerate passivity. The exam question erases all that, and makes them alien creatures with pre-determined opinions. (On my oath, I didn't spot the irony till I'd already finished the sentence.)
Upvote:2
You and the examiner were right to say 'false'. However, it's not a good fit for a true/false question.
In 1688, after the deposition of James II, the English parliament was divided in two groups, Tories and Whigs, whose political characteristics corresponded to the religious creed professed: Tories, conservatives, were Catholics; Whigs, liberals, were Anglicans.
Let's take these dichotomies one at a time.
Catholic/Anglican. The Whigs formed out of the Exclusionists, who wished to exclude the Catholic James II from succeeding his Anglican brother, Charles II. The Tories wished to keep James II as heir.
The Tories were not Catholics. Their two main principles were the divine right of kings, and pro-Church of England-ism. It's probable that any Catholics in England would have leaned towards the Tories, as the Whigs had nothing to offer them. However, the Tories as a group were Anglican. We could say that Catholics may have been relatively pro-Tory, but the Tories were definitely not pro-Catholic.
A few Tories probably joined or supported the Jacobites, but most of them resigned themselves to the rule of William of Orange after 1689, because William promised to preserve the independence of the Church of England from Rome (and did). Many were likely relieved, since it was feared James II would forcibly convert the country to Catholicism.
The Whigs were Anglicans, but more likely to favour toleration of Protestant dissenters, which they enacted in the Toleration Act when William came to power. William favoured extending toleration to Catholics as well, but the Whigs wouldn't let him, as they thought Catholics would use toleration as a cover to take over the country and kill people who wouldn't convert, per other European monarchs and Mary the I of England.
Conservative/Liberal. Where to start? Liberal like the Lib Dems, or the US Democrats, or the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party, or the German FDP, or William Gladstone, or... what?
For simplicity's sake, I'll assume the question refers to 19th century British liberalism: religious toleration, supremacy of parliament over the Crown, etc. So conservatism will be C-of-E-only-ism, and royal supremacy.
The Whigs favoured a more powerful parliament, and the Tories did not. To that extent the answer is clearly that the Whigs were more liberal.
In terms of religious toleration it's a bit more complicated. The Whigs favoured limited toleration for Protestant 'dissenters', including Quakers, etc. The Tories were against even this.
However, James II favoured toleration for all Christian denominations, including both Catholics and dissenters (see the 'Declaration of Indulgence'). Is it 'liberal' to depose a king who wants to extend toleration, and then to only extend it a tiny bit?
Upvote:5
For most of the time in question, Catholics were excluded from standing for, or even voting for, parliament. So there could not really be any opposition between Catholics and Protestants within parliament itself, as the cited question seems to imply.
More post
- 📝 How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
- 📝 Who were the first people to get divorced in Western* Christendom?
- 📝 Did India turn down a permanent seat in the UN in 1955?
- 📝 Did churches in American south have to be segregated by law?
- 📝 How did people cut "pieces of eight"?
- 📝 What uncertainties and questions surround the death of Attila?
- 📝 Why does Alexander the Great call Greeks free men while Persians slaves?
- 📝 Did Nabataean traders use linen, or cotton, for their sails?
- 📝 Was the Second Industrial Revolution directly related to the first?
- 📝 Why did Canada retain the rank of Brigadier General? But not Australia, New Zealand, or UK?
- 📝 To prevent sex were men bound in bags or locked in beds?
- 📝 From what time can this jewelry date?
- 📝 How come Incas believed that the Spanish were the incarnation of their “thunder god”?
- 📝 Did cavalry in China use spears instead of swords?
- 📝 Who was the first human to survive a vertical launched rocket flight?
- 📝 What was the age of majority in 1900 United States?
- 📝 Why did 1906 Iranian constitutionalists use the Belgian constitution as inspiration?
- 📝 Where did Metternich say the Balkans began?
- 📝 Is there a link between national debt/trade deficit and starting a war?
- 📝 Were debts owed or outstanding debts factored into the Roman census?
- 📝 Earlier U.S. law enforcement raids on lawyers' communications
- 📝 What is the origin of the term "Developer" in the context of software?
- 📝 Is there historical evidence that Emperor Ashoka converted to Buddhism?
- 📝 Is it possible to say whether any historical empire was ever recreated after dissolution?
- 📝 What's the festival shown in this illustration?
- 📝 How is the year "753 BC" given in ancient legends about the founding of Rome?
- 📝 In U.S. military forces, did black soldiers suffer a heavy racial segregation during World War II?
- 📝 Why are Mary I, Mary II and Anne not as famous as Elizabeth I, Victoria and Elizabeth II?
- 📝 How and why did the "Green Gang" hold the balance of power in Shanghai in 1927?
- 📝 How Successful Were the International Brigades?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Were Tories "Catholics" and "Whigs" Anglican?
- 📝 Why were old fortifications shaped like stars and not like circles?
- 📝 Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
- 📝 Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?
- 📝 Why were Spain and Portugal neutral / not invaded in WWII?
- 📝 Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?
- 📝 In the "Christmas truce" of 1914 were there any football (soccer) matches between British and German troops?
- 📝 How were concentration and extermination camp guards recruited?
- 📝 Why were the drawings of Colossus burnt after WW2 and why was its very existence "of course" kept secret?
- 📝 How were drawbridges and portcullises used tactically?
- 📝 Why were British ships not of the same quality as French and Spanish ships until the latter part of the 18th century?
- 📝 How were the cities of Milan and Bruges spared by the Black Death?
- 📝 Why did Roosevelt and Churchill use voice-based telecommunication, instead of simpler text-based options which were easier to encrypt?
- 📝 Were there any Germans in Japan after the surrender of Germany in May, 1945 and if so, what happened to them?
- 📝 In WWII, what were the major differences in tank combat on the eastern and western fronts?
- 📝 Were there inns and hostels in medieval Europe?
- 📝 Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?
- 📝 How many lives were estimated to have been saved by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs?
- 📝 How were diplomats and their staffs treated when World War II was declared?
- 📝 What were the EMP effects, if any, of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 When and where were the first coins made showing the currency or a face value?
- 📝 Why were the Germans and Russians so fixated on an unlikely "separate peace" in 1945?
- 📝 How expensive were castles? And how were the costs distributed?
- 📝 Is it true that US tracer rounds were red and VC green during Vietnam war?
- 📝 What East German laws and regulations were extended to the West after unification?
- 📝 Why were La Réunion and Mauritius uninhabited?
- 📝 Where were ancient Romans supposed to dispose of their waste and garbage?
- 📝 Are there historical instances of settlers who were largely uncontacted and undisturbed after settling?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 What were the demographics and economics of South-East Asian islands around year 1400?