Are there any communist leaders without a record of acts we consider as a crime (against humanity)?

It depends on what you mean by communists, leaders, and crime against humanity. All those are vague politically loaded terms.

Communists are just label. I can think of a few communists leader that are "fine". I called them fine because they help their countries out of communism. So in a sense they're communist leader. In a sense they're not. These people does not commit any crime against large number of humans.

In fact, the kind of communist leaders that do not commit such crime are usually the exact same guy that want to promote free market. You can define crime against humanity in pretty broad terms, mass murders, mass rape, frequent wars, censorship, trade restrictions. The more a leader support free market, the less likely they commit crimes against humanity.

Once economy moves to free market, mass murders simply stop.

Deng Xiao Ping is the guy that bring China to prosperity. No mass murder.

Gorbachov is the guy that raise white flag to the west. No mass murder.

Lee Kuan Yew often said that Singapore is a socialist country. That makes him a communist leader. However, murder rate in Singapore is lower than in US and their percapita income is 1.5 time. Perhaps Singapore didn't practice the more heinous aspect of communism, like minimum wage.

I wouldn't call Pinochet communists, however, he is a leader in a country fallen to communism. Hence he is technically a leader of a communist country that somehow manage to reform his country's backward socialist society to a liveable one for the productive. He promote free market and hence is innocent of the worst crime against humanity, namely trade restrictions.

Obama is also a communist leader. However, he hasn't done mass murder yet because his population is well armed. He tries to create gun free zones so that some psycho can kill even more people and he can then use it as excuses to disarm the population. His plan will work because the majority of his people are commies that are just eager to slaughter the productive after looting good people through welfare and other social programs.

Also there are many leaders with "communist" like goal, like helping the poor and the oppressed, that actually fight against crimes against humanity.

Milton Friedman, for example, defend the right of the poor several time when he demands elimination of racist laws like minimum wage, anti prostitution laws, and war on drugs.

I don't think Milton counts as communists, but he fight for the right of the poor so much and he's a leader so we may want to include him. He doesn't commit mass murder either.

As for practical leaders, it is impossible to be a communist leader and not to be very cruel dictator. Communism doesn't work. And a communist leader (CL) have to make it look out as if it works. Somebody has to pay for that. CL's people pay by their lives for nothing, talents for dust, children for "revolution" and so on. The false idea cannot not be cruel. When the people ends with the dead morals, dying nature, ill and extincting population, communism falls off as a parasit from the dead master. And a CL starts a "perestroyka"

As for pure party leaders, there were Marx and Engels. They were communist leaders, but never they ruled people. So, even if they proposed a cannibalistic regime, they did not realized it. So, they answer for crimes of Lenin as Nizsche for Hitler's.

The only practic crimes they did were these of Engels as usual capitalist of those days and Marx, when he sometimes published articles of Engels as own works. (way of sponsoring from Engels' side)

Are these two OK for you? On the badges with communist chiefs they were in one row with Lenin and Stalin (sometimes +Mao)

Communist or not, anyone invested with a significant, unchecked power will do whatever they need to do to preserve that power. If you've ever spent time around someone who is an "executive" in business or government, you can get a small taste of that -- the pursuit of power changes people.

Decency, etc is a matter of perspective -- and people's perspective adapts to the surroundings.

I would offer the example of Josip Broz Tito. The worst thing that happened (while his troops were finishing gaining control of the country) was a massacre of Nazis and nazi sympathizers that happened during the Bleiburg repatriations and all evidence suggests that Tito honestly ordered that no harm should come to anyone surrendering during these events.

First of all I should note that oppressing opposition and even killing arbitrary random people on the streets for fun is not a crime against humanity as defined legally. Crimes against humanity are only

• genocide
• starting a war of aggression.

That is your question mixes the idea of human rights with the idea of crimes against humanity.

It also seems that you presume that all power in any socialist state belonged to the "leader" which was not the case in the majority of instances.

So if you are interested in the idea of human rights, the communists claimed that by oppressing certain political rights of bourgeoisie they can provide better rights for the laborers which constituted the majority of the population in the beginning of 20th century.

That said they claimed two things:

1. They provide much better basic economic rights for the poor majority (right for shelter, right for employment, right for rest and recreation, free medicine and education etc)

2. They restrict only such political activity that threatens the socialist system because they may lead to the abolishment of the above mentioned rights.

At the same time they claimed that the capitalist countries restricted political activity not to the less extent as the socialist countries did. For example, in most capitalist countries to be elected to an office or become a parliament member one have to collect a huge amount of money just for advertising, so ordinary people never get elected (which was not the case in socialist countries).

Also large areas of life in capitalist countries were controlled by business so that the business could exert their pressure on any government, even if a communist is elected.

They claimed as well that the right to speech and other political rights of proletariat are limited in capitalist countries because the media is controlled by the capitalists.

I do not know what do you mean under "slaughter" of political opponents but if you mean criminal prosecution of people who did not invoke an overthrow of the government, then such kind of "slaughter" was not practiced in the USSR after Stalin.

President Salvador Allende of Chile was a Marxist who was democratically elected in a three way race in 1970. He instituted economic policies that were left wing, but from a human rights point of view, he was "more sinned against than sinning." He was overthrown in a military coup d'etat in 1973, which caused him to commit suicide. THAT was a crime against humanity.

The Communist Party of India has been operating under the framework of democracy for 60+ years now. (1, 2). Even though they have not been part of any national government till now, many government required their support. Also they have been in power in three states (Kerala, West Bengal and Tripura).

Some of the notable communist leaders in India were

A K Gopalan (AKG) - First Opposition Leader of India

E M Shankaran Nampoodiripad - Leader of the first democratically elected Communist government in the world.

Jyoti Basu - Who was slated to be the Prime Minister of India in 1996, but the party rejected the proposal to make him the Prime Minister.