Why were the golden plates necessary if Joseph Smith received his translation of the Book of Mormon by viewing a stone in his hat?

score:6

Accepted answer

Not even the stones were really necessary, as is clearly shown by the many revelations that came without them.

But: The existence of the seer stone shows that Joseph believed that revelation could come through a physical object. So that helped his faith, but also probably made the translation easier for him, as he had more experience with the stone than "direct revelation". I think we see that change later during the course of his life.

Second: The existence of the plates, even though few people saw them, helped that people believed this was an actual record written by ancient prophets. Also, it provided the opportunity to have the witnesses see the plates and testify for their existence, giving more credibility to Joseph.

Joseph wasn't given the ability to read and understand the plates, and then carry out a translation with this knowledge. He was given the translation directly.

Upvote:-1

Joseph Smith was not a well-educated man, and he certainly knew nothing about Hebrew, Greek or Aramaic, let alone "Reformed Egyptian." His claims that angelic beings dictated what he was to write, was necessary to lend credibility to his Book of Mormon. The introduction to the Book of Mormon says that the glorified and resurrected prophet Moroni appeared to Joseph Smith and instructed him relative to the ancient record and its destined translation into the English language:

In due course the plates were delivered to Joseph Smith, who translated them by the gift and power of God. Source: Book of Mormon Introduction 1981

The Book of Mormon 9:32 says this:

“And now, behold, we have written this record according to our knowledge, in the characters which are called among us the reformed Egyptian, being handed down and altered by us, according to our manner of speech.” (See 1 Ne.1:2; Mosiah 1:2)

Verse 34 says “because that none other people knoweth our language, therefore he[God] hath prepared means for the interpretation thereof.”

1 Nephi 1:2 says “Yea, I make a record in the language of my father, which consists of the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians.”

Mosiah 1:2 says King Benjamin taught his three sons, Mosiah, Helorum and Helaman the language of his fathers. This is cross-referenced to Mormon 9:32 which says they used “reformed Egyptian.”

It is important to note that the first book of Nephi was written circa 600 BC, the book of Moshia around 130 BC and the book of Mormon around 332 AD.

The fact that there is no evidence of any language called "Reformed Egyptian" or that the golden plates do not exist necessitated the story of how Joseph Smith came to translate this unknown language. Whether he used seer stones or not is hardly relevant. Indeed, it somewhat detracts from the authenticity of the claim that angels dictated what Joseph Smith was to write. Why they failed to use English is a mystery, given Joseph Smith plagiarised from the King James Authorised Version, even to the extent of using the archaic language of 1611.

Further information here: https://www.equip.org/articles/the-book-of-mormon-vs-the-bible/

More post

Search Posts

Related post