How well supported is the generic interpretation Rublev's Icon as being a depiction of the Holy Trinity as portrayed in Genesis 18?
Upvote:2
Catholic Perspective
The Navarre Bible - Pentateuch explanatory note on Gen 18:1-15 has in part:
This new appearance of God to Abraham is somewhat mysterious: the three men stand for God. When Abraham speaks to them, sometimes he addresses them in singular (as if there were only one person there: cf. v.3), and sometimes in the plural (as if they were three: cf. v.4). That is why some Fathers interpreted this appearance as an early announcement of the mystery of the Holy Trinity; others, following Jewish tradition (cf. Heb 13:2) take these personages to be angels. The sacred text says that one of the three men ([the LORD]), apparently stays with Abraham (cf. v. 22), while the other two, who are referred to as angels, go to Sodom (cf. 19:1).
Upvote:3
Among church fathers, Ambrose is one supporter:
Abraham, who was glad to receive strangers, faithful to God and tireless in his service and prompt in fulfilling his duty, saw the Trinity typified. He added religious devotion to hospitality, for although he beheld three, he adored one, and while keeping a distinction of the persons, yet he called one Lord, thus giving honor to the three but signifying one power. (On His Brother, Satyrus 2.96)
Caesarius of Arles similarly writes:
He received the three men and served them loaves out of three measures. Why is this, brothers, unless it means the mystery of the Trinity? [...] In the fact that he saw three, as was already said, he understood the mystery of the Trinity, but since he adored them as one, he recognized that there is one God in three persons. (Sermon 83.4)
Origen actually finds images of the members of the Trinity in the food that is served. The calf represents Christ (Homilies on Genesis 4.2), and the preparation of three equal measures of flour into bread is an image of the Trinity (On Abraham 1.5.38).
Other fathers are not so supportive of this idea. Ephrem the Syrian believed just one of them was the Lord (Commentary on Genesis, 15.1), while Augustine called all three of them angels (City of God, 16.29).
See the Ancient Christian Commentary if you'd like to investigate further.
More post
- π Is God unknowable?
- π What do People of Praise believe?
- π Italian Version of St. Maxilmian Kolbe writings
- π How do Catholics respond to the claims that the cross has pagan origins?
- π Is it a sin or forbidden to follow any of the parts of the Law of Moses?
- π What are the general categories of benefits of being part of a denomination?
- π Are there any Christian denominations that reject some of the gospels in the New Testament?
- π According to Augustine, what's the difference between regenerate life and that before the fall?
- π What is the "present crisis" in 1 Corinthians 7?
- π What is the significance of Palm branches?
- π Are Catholics not supposed to pray the St. Michael Prayer?
- π Is the feast of 1 Corinthians 5:8 the same feast as 1 Cor 11?
- π Lords Prayer. Asking for Forgiveness
- π What are the NIV cross-references? Where do they come from?
- π Creation, Fall, Redemption (Restoration/New Creation): Who said it first?
- π Is Paul making an oath in Galatians 1?
- π Can a marriage proceed if fiancΓ© is unconscious?
- π Does Ezekiel 28 speak of Satan (as "king of Tyre")?
- π How did the Church fathers of the first four centuries understand 2 Corinthians 5:21?
- π Will (or "do") people in heaven get to interact with Jesus, independent of massive crowds?
- π Gregory of Nazianzus - First Oration - Translation of ΞΊΞ±α½Ά αΌ‘ αΌΟΟὴ δΡξιὰ
- π What is the biblical basis for only keeping the weekly Sabbath while disregarding all the other feasts/holy convocations (Lev 23, Num 28, 29)?
- π How did Aquinas and Reformation-era Protestants disagree on God's will?
- π Which does St. Thomas Aquinas teach is greater, to know God or to love Him?
- π What arguments from scripture are given by Baptists for the belief that one third of the angels were banished from heaven with Satan?
- π How do Catholics reconcile these verses about giving publicly and yet privately?
- π What is the story behind a monkβs tonsure?
- π Do any Protestants teach that everyone really knows God according to Romans 1:21?
- π Do the Dead Sea scrolls describe any prophecy which was fulfilled after they were written?
- π Were there any female priests in the temple?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π How well supported is the generic interpretation Rublev's Icon as being a depiction of the Holy Trinity as portrayed in Genesis 18?
- π How is the Catholic interpretation of the Woman of the Apocalypse as being Mary reconciled with the dogma of perpetual virginity?
- π How do Protestants respond to the JW interpretation of John 14:28?
- π To a YEC, how does a metaphorical interpretation of Genesis 1-3 distort the gospel?
- π How do proponents of Sola Scriptura choose the "correct" interpretation of a key Bible verse?
- π What is the biblical/logical basis for rejecting the "physical" interpretation of Christ's being the Only Begotten Son?
- π How do those who believe in salvation by grace, and in works being the fruit of salvation, explain Galatians 6:8-9?
- π How do those who hold to a literal interpretation of the flood account respond to the criticism that Noah building the ark would be unfeasible?
- π How does the Catholic Church interpret Matthew 23:9 so as to normalize priests being called Father?
- π Is there a Biblical basis for the concept of being allowed to "be angry with God" or "tell him just how we feel"
- π How well-accepted are Thomas Paine's views about the Bible being against monarchy?
- π Is there consensus between Christian commentators about how Jesus came to be atop the temple when being tempted by Satan in the wilderness?
- π How do Christians argue about Jewish objections against Jesus being the Messiah
- π How does the Catholic Church explain their interpretation of Matthew 16:19 (Simon Peter as the first Pope) in light of Matthew 18:18?
- π How would the four major eschatological views differ in their interpretation of Revelation 21:4?
- π How does Original Sin come back in man even after being washed at the time of baptism?
- π How are the broken bones in the Shroud of Turin seen to be consistent with the bones of Jesus not being broken?
- π How is doing 'what is right in the eyes of everyone' different from being 'politically correct'?
- π How would different Protestant denominations reconcile Matthew 5:19 with the notion of being saved by grace?
- π How and when was the belief that a baptism late in life increases our chances of being saved determined to be false?
- π How do those who believe that Jesus is a created being understand the verses which say everything that was created was created by him?
- π How does the Mormon Church reconcile the following claim with the Bible? "The Church of Jesus Christ was well established in the time of Adam."
- π Why was Descartes' interpretation of the Catholic transubstantiation not approved by Church and how can it be improved?
- π How can we understand the SDA interpretation of Daniel 9:26?
- π How do Jehovah's Witnesses justify their interpretation of Daniel chapter 4 given the specificity of the text?
- π How does one explain God being outside the universe yet on the throne in heaven without violating divine simplicity?
- π How do those who believe Jesus was eternally the Son explain Jesus being chosen?
- π According to a Catholic interpretation of the Bible, was Jesus being glib in Matthew 6:34?
- π How do believers in the dead being conscious explain the absence of reports about afterlife experiences by Lazarus and other resurrected individuals?
- π How do proponents of Sola Scriptura defend the doctrine without scripture being canonized until after the proof texts were written?