Should homoousion in the Nicene Creed be translated as "same substance" or as “one substance?”
Upvote:1
The authors of the creed definitely meant that God and Christ are one substance. Remember that the creed was formulated against Arius, who claimed that Christ was of a similar substance with the Father, not the same substance. The Christological issue here is that Arius makes Jesus out to be not eternal, whereas God is eternal. Both of these ideas are in direct contradiction with scripture, which says of Christ "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... and the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us" and in which Christ says of Himself "I and the Father are one" and "truly I tell you, before Abraham was, I AM [YHWH]." (Emphases mine).
In keeping with the plain truth of scripture, the Nicene fathers are affirming that the Word, which is Jesus Christ, is of one substance with the Father, that He and the Father "are one," and that He is, truly, God. Nothing other than total qualitative sameness is possible here.
Edit: A caveat, the contention is that the Son of God is not eternal, whereas orthodox Christianity holds that He is, in keeping with John 1. The human nature of Christ is created and exists in time. But the Son, consubstantial with the Father, is eternal and is fully and totally God, necessarily, or else John 1 (and Christ's own words, "I and the Father are one) is mistaken.
Upvote:1
One of the main arguments of classical Arianism was that, since the Father is unbegotten, and the Son begotten (of the Father), then the two must therefore of necessity be of a different nature, inasmuch as one and the same substance cannot be said to be both begotten and unbegotten at the same time, inasmuch as that would lead to a blatant self-contradiction.
As such, IF one includes the personal or hypostatic attributes (fatherhood, son-ship, and procession) within the term substance, one must of necessity use h*m*-ousios, rather than mono-ousios, per your own (correct) understanding of the term's historical meaning, prior to the rise of Arianism.
However, IF one excludes personal or hypostatic attributes from the term's definition, than one could use either. This exclusion is ultimately the work of the Cappadocian fathers. It was not present at Nicaea, hence its use of h*m*- rather than mono-ousios; and, while the Cappadocians themselves have never, to my knowledge, actually changed Greek Nicene terminology, they nevertheless made it possible to translate or render h*m*-ousios as of one and/or the same substance, in stead of strictly of the same substance, as it has previously been the case.
More post
- 📝 Biblical reference that if someone is saved through someone else, that creates a "reward" or "treasure" in heaven?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, is are there any teachings or traditions about who was the host of the house where Jesus celebrated his Last Supper?
- 📝 Paintings of the Holy Family with a young St. Joseph?
- 📝 What reasons does Christianity give for "Why There Must Be A God?"
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for thinking that Jesus died for me specifically?
- 📝 Who was the intended audience for the Book of Matthew?
- 📝 What is the storyline order of the Bible?
- 📝 Why does Jesus speak of himself in the third person?
- 📝 Do orthodox Christians fast on Monday to exceed the righteousness of the pharisees and scribes?
- 📝 How did Jesus select the Apostles to witness the Transfiguration?
- 📝 How do those who hold to a view of open communion practice church discipline?
- 📝 Where can I find Patristic Commentary on the Golden Calf incident?
- 📝 What were the Jehovah's Witness arguments against doing the Nazi salute?
- 📝 How do Arminians reconcile free will with God's omnipotence logically?
- 📝 Did Jesus help drunk people in Cana to be even more drunk?
- 📝 What are the common arguments against theistic evolution?
- 📝 What's "reciprocal subsidiarity"?
- 📝 Before anything was created, did God already know the events that would unfold?
- 📝 Did the Jansenists deny the gratuity of grace?
- 📝 Can a Catholic Bishop Lose His Ecclesiastical Rank without being Defrocked?
- 📝 What is the history of silent prayer?
- 📝 What is Wesley's concept of Entire Sanctification?
- 📝 How can one judge how accurate a given Bible translation is?
- 📝 Has anyone heard of or seen anything that Angels can be redeemed?
- 📝 Is the philosophy of René Girard compatible with mainline Christianity?
- 📝 If we had to make distinction, which is greater, faith or hope? [Catholic Perspective]
- 📝 If the second person of the triune god bears witness of himself, why is it not true?
- 📝 What does it mean to test God?
- 📝 Who is permitted to write a canon or an akathist hymn to a Saint in the Eastern Orthodox Church, and how is it done?
- 📝 Taking shoes off before closing a deal - is there an history evidence?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Should h*m*ousion in the Nicene Creed be translated as "same substance" or as “one substance?”
- 📝 Should the phrase "God from God" in the Nicene Creed be translated as "god from god"?
- 📝 How should I understand the emphasis on "begotten, not made" in the Nicene Creed?
- 📝 Was the Nicene Creed accepted under duress?
- 📝 Does the Nicene Creed condemn Chiliasm?
- 📝 Does the Nicene Creed suggest a strict division of responsibilities within the Trinity?
- 📝 Should Genesis 1:2 be translated "And the earth became without form..."?
- 📝 What did "one baptism" in the Nicene Creed mean back then?
- 📝 Doctrinal significance of the tense and subject of "Adored and Glorified" in the Nicene Creed
- 📝 A Question regarding arguments against the Nicene Creed
- 📝 Was the "Nicene Creed" of AD 381 an update of the Nicene Creed of AD 325?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians explain the Athanasian Creed saying that the "one God" is the Trinity rather than the Father as in the Nicene Creed?
- 📝 What does the Nicene Creed mean when it says that the Father and the Son are of the same substance?
- 📝 Was the Athanasian Creed ever translated into Koine Greek? If so, where can I find the text?
- 📝 What evidence is there that the original framers of the 325 Nicene Creed intended it to be read in subordinationist ways?
- 📝 Which are the OT prophesies referred to in the Nicene Creed in relation to Jesus' Resurrection?
- 📝 In The Nicene Creed is Jesus equal to God the Father?
- 📝 Should a Protestant accept the Nicene Creed?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church explain the addition of the word “died” in the Nicene Creed
- 📝 Why do most Catholic Churches not say the Nicene Creed anymore and instead say the Apostle's Creed?
- 📝 Does the phrasing in Nicene Creed cast doubt on the eternality of The Son of God?
- 📝 How can we trust the Bible after it has been translated to another language?
- 📝 Did the Apostles' Creed originate with the Apostles?
- 📝 In what order should the books of the (Protestant) Bible be read?
- 📝 According to the Bible, how should Christians meditate?
- 📝 Why is the Gospel of Thomas considered heretical by Nicene Christians?
- 📝 Should a Protestant read the apocryphal books of the Bible?
- 📝 To whom should we pray? To the Father or the son Jesus or the Holy Spirit?
- 📝 What should a Catholic Religious Ed. class be taught about the Reformation?
- 📝 What guidelines or rules should be used when interpreting the Bible?