Is there a scriptural support for "man are ‘half animal, half angel’"?
score:0
I think the statement "half man and half animal" is a derogatory interpretation of the traditional Christian belief that God created man as a special type of creature, fully spiritual and existing in a material body (as Christ is fully man and fully God, so man is not divided in his materiality and spirituality).
But if I had to guess, I think Feuerbach is just criticizing Christians for being occupied with spiritual pursuits. I would suppose he thinks this interferes with their ability to love their fellow man, but Christians believe this pursuit actually enhances their love for man.
Back on topic: I cannot find any scripture or material from the church fathers that describes man as "half animal and half angel" specifically. Here is what I did find:
(All biblical passages are in the NIV and taken from https://www.biblegateway.com)
Psalm 8:5-9
You have made them a little lower than the angels and crowned them with glory and honor. You made them rulers over the works of your hands; you put everything under their feet: all flocks and herds, and the animals of the wild
Genesis 1:26
Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals
Daniel 4:16 This bit deserves some background, King Nebuchadnezzar had a dream and his dream is fulfilled as a punishment given to him so that he might know God. Notice the phrases uses in the description of the dream:
let him graze with the beasts on the grass of the earth. Let his heart be changed from that of a man, Let him be given the heart of a beast, And let seven times pass over him.
Then the prophecy comes true in verse 31:
“King Nebuchadnezzar, to you it is spoken: the kingdom has departed from you! ... he was driven from men and ate grass like oxen; his body was wet with the dew of heaven till his hair had grown like eagles’ feathers and his nails like birds’ claws.
1 Corinthians 15:39-42
All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial ... And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. ... we shall all be changed, ... for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption
I didn't have a bunch of time to track down a lot of writings from the church fathers on Christian anthropology, but New Advent has St. Gregory of Nyssa's On the Making of Man which seems to be suited to this subject (http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2914.htm). In many parts of this work St. Gregory expounds on the uniqueness and glory of mankind's creation. Not once does he characterize man as being half animal, but stresses how beautiful creation is and how man is the crowning jewel of that creation.
So let address some philosophical differences between Christianity and the utilitarian materialist ideology that the quote above teaches (I'm not familiar with Feuerbach's work). Christianity teaches that man is unique in that he reflects the divine image and possesses will and reason. The doctrine of the incarnation teaches us that material nature is not in conflict with divinity, but that that which is material can be divine and wholly good, and is purposed to be so (a famous quote from some church father is that man becomes by grace what God is by nature).
A man being animal is not completely out of the question in Christian teaching; but this happens by the destruction of that man's humanity, the annihilation of his person by the withdrawal of the grace of God (as happened to King N). Man is purposed to move through and fulfill his materialness so that he can be resurrected incorruptible (as Paul teaches).
Feuerbach's quote above does not explain how man is unique from creation (what is the difference between an animal and a person?), or what his purpose is. But it does call Christians to abandon their spirituality for more practical aims.
If his accusation is that Christians believe in the spiritual realm as the ultimate reality, then I would say that his assertion is absolutely correct (provided it is also understood that Christians believe they need to care for and love all of creation to attain spiritual blessedness).
So he is expressing a view antithetical to Christianity. Christians believe that man can become a true "person" by being spiritual. Feuerbach teaches that man can become a true "person" by abandoning his spirituality. I think his statement is correct in a sense, Christians are part angel because they worship God and part animal because they live on earth, but it isn't how a Christian would put it.
As a side note Dostoevsky gives a great picture of ideologies much like this in his work Demons. The only antithesis offered in that work to the flood of materialist ideology is one character experiencing the birth of his wife's child in which he is filled with joy which is juxtaposed against the barren heartlessness of the progressive and revolutionary characters.
Upvote:-1
There is a verse that gives room for such interpretation:
"So he brought the people down to the water; and the Lord said to Gideon, "Every one that laps the water with his tongue, as a dog laps, you shall set by himself; likewise every one that kneels down to drink." And the number of those that lapped, putting their hands to their mouths, was three hundred men; but all the rest of the people knelt down to drink water. And the Lord said to Gideon, "With the three hundred men that lapped I will deliver you, and give the Midianites into your hand; and let all the others go every man to his home." So he took the jars of the people from their hands, and their trumpets; and he sent all the rest of Israel every man to his tent, but retained the three hundred men; and the camp of Midian was below him in the valley." (Judges 7:5-8)
Another verse:
But she came and knelt before him, saying, "Lord, help me." And he answered, "It is not fair to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs." (Matthew 15:25,26)
Upvote:2
There is a verse in Genesis that gives room for such interpretation:
"When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the Lord said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown. The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." — Genesis 6:1-5
So, based on this text, some interpret that the "sons of God" were angels, who had sexual relationship with women, thus giving birth to "half animal, half angel" creatures.
When we consider the context of this text we can better understand what Moses is explaining. In previous chapters we are given a glimpse of two competing lines, the godly line of Seth and the wicked line of Cain. Having established the antithesis in the garden, after affirming that there would be a constant struggle between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent we are given snapshot pictures of each of these armies.
We see Seth’s line about the business of exercising dominion, in submission to the Lord. We see Cain’s line dishonoring the law of God and making names for themselves. But the future is not mere co-existence between the two lines. The drama builds toward the great crisis of Noah’s flood right here in chapter 6. The great change, what creates the great downward spiral of humanity on the earth is that the two lines come together as one. That is, the godly line of Seth, the sons of God, seeing how attractive are the daughters of men, the wicked line of Cain, decide to take them as wives. The end result, however, isn’t mere dilution. It’s not that the now joined line becomes morally lukewarm, but that evil spreads, grows, deepens.
I hope this helps. Blessings!
More post
- 📝 According to Full Preterists, what historical facts fulfilled the signs and wonders prophesied by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:9?
- 📝 How do universalists avoid tempation?
- 📝 Did Arminius believe Adam's actual guilt was imputed against all humanity?
- 📝 Does Acts 20:33-34 suggest that a church should not have a paid ministry?
- 📝 What was the importance of including all of the families in books like Numbers?
- 📝 What cautionary advice have evangelists given that address Gandhi's concern about "Rice Christians"?
- 📝 What is the position of the United Methodist Church on creationism and evolution
- 📝 What is the Catholic view of the Bible's teachings on marrying widows?
- 📝 How is the "baptism in the Holy Spirit" (promoted through CHARIS) connected with the Sacrament of Baptism?
- 📝 According to Catholic scholars, why was Blessed Virgin Mary spared of temptations on her way to motherhood?
- 📝 Is there any tradition that argues for prophetical succession under the Old Testament just like some argue for Apostolic succession?
- 📝 According to reformed theology: Is loving God a choice? If not, do the elect differ from robots?
- 📝 Why do Filipino Catholics have a harder time to get a church annulment?
- 📝 Is there a reason why female Mormon missionaries wear such varied dresses but male Mormon missionaries wear uniforms?
- 📝 How did the tradition of Mothering Sunday arise?
- 📝 To what name does Didache X refer?
- 📝 Famous theologians or saints who held that there were no valid Popes during the Great Western Schism?
- 📝 How do sedevacantists who claim the See has been empty since Vatican II understand the legitimacy of the bishops and priests?
- 📝 What is the earliest systematic New Testament commentary?
- 📝 Will (or "do") people in heaven get to interact with Jesus, independent of massive crowds?
- 📝 Should Christians be against the death penalty?
- 📝 Do the teachings of Catholic Church prohibit the use of “Amen” for purposes other than prayers?
- 📝 How does Jesus' pre-incarnational existence relate to oneness pentecostalist godhead doctrine?
- 📝 Why did ancient catechumens delay baptism as long as possible?
- 📝 How (and by whom) are financial decisions made in the Catholic Church?
- 📝 In Luke 18:8, does the Geek word translated “quickly” mean “suddenly” in this instance?
- 📝 Does 2 Peter 1:10 teach salvation can be gained through faith plus works?
- 📝 What's the difference between the Apostle's claims and the claims of others who started religious movements?
- 📝 What does Hebrews 10:26 mean?
- 📝 Can we truly know anything about God's character?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there a scriptural support for "man are ‘half animal, half angel’"?
- 📝 Is there any scriptural support for the belief of convulsions/seizures being a sign of the Holy Spirit's presence?
- 📝 Is there any Scriptural support for claims about Jesus appearing to Muslims in dreams and visions?
- 📝 Are there multiple levels to Heaven, for different levels of reward?
- 📝 Are there Old Testament Scriptures that mention salvation for the Gentiles?
- 📝 Are there theological explanations for why God allowed ambiguity to exist in Scripture?
- 📝 What support is there for the Jehovah’s Witness translation of John 1:1?
- 📝 Are there any English Bible translations whose primary text for the OT is the Septuagint?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support a preference for second-career pastors coming disproportionately from IT?
- 📝 Is there any biblical support for copyright law?
- 📝 Is there any biblical support for the Church to allow governments to close churches and prevent public worship?
- 📝 Are there any biblical incidents of people condemned for consensual premarital sex?
- 📝 Are there "rational" criteria for which books appear in the Bible?
- 📝 Are there any sects of Christianity that still practice animal sacrifice?
- 📝 What support is there in the Patristic writings for Marian Devotion?
- 📝 Is there a name for the belief that some individuals would always freely reject salvation no matter the world in which they are created?
- 📝 What biblical and historical support is there for the practice of child communion?
- 📝 Is there a scriptural basis for treating the non-Gospel books of the New Testament as scripture?
- 📝 What scriptural arguments are there, if any, that there is hell but it is not eternal?
- 📝 What Biblical support is there for a non-Churched Christianity?
- 📝 What biblical reasons are there for using the Lord's Prayer as a pattern for prayer rather than a prayer to repeat verbatim?
- 📝 Is there Biblical support for the concept that 'Whenever a man lies with a woman...a transcendental relation is set up between them'?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the belief that there are humans in heaven now?
- 📝 Is civil divorce OK for Catholics, are there mitigating circumstances?
- 📝 Are there gender requirements for Sponsors for a Catholic baptism?
- 📝 Other than non-Trinitarian, what terms are there for Christians who don't believe in the trinity?
- 📝 What major views are there on the question of whether God shares moral responsibility for our deeds, good and bad?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the Apostle St. Peter founded the Church in Antioch and, if so, what are the implications?
- 📝 For Biblical Unitarians, are there divine attributes that the Father has but the Son doesn't?
- 📝 Are there other sources for the belief in Catholicism that the Apostles composed the articles present in the Apostles' Creed between them?