Is there a pattern to the occurrences of "reply to the argument for the contrary" section in Aquinas's π‘†π‘’π‘šπ‘šπ‘Ž π‘‡β„Žπ‘’π‘œπ‘™π‘œπ‘”π‘–π‘π‘Ž?

score:3

Accepted answer

The "anomaly" seems to be when St. Thomas refutes or commentates on a sed contra.

In II-II q. 83 a. 14, for example, he refers to a sed contra as the fourth objection:

II-II q. 83 a. 14 s.c.:
Sed contra, videtur quod [But against (the thesis), it seems that…]…

II-II q. 83 a. 14 ad 4:
Ad quartum [i.e., "to the sed contra"] dicendum quod [roughly, "I say that…"].

Usually, sed contras are arguments from authority and he doesn't refute them.


St. Thomas doesn't number his objections in his original Latin, nor does he use the term "objection" there. The format is:

Videtur quod [It seems that] …
PrΓ¦terea [furthermore], videtur quod…
PrΓ¦terea, …
PrΓ¦terea, …
etc.

Sed contra [On the contrary], …

Ad primum [As to the first (objection)], …
Ad secundum [second] …
Ad tertium [third] …
etc.

More post

Search Posts

Related post