What was the definition of the spiritual gift of the word of Knowledge in early pentecostalism?
score:2
Since asking the question I have now read three books by influential pentecostal pioneers on the issue, and they do not agree on the definition of the gift of the word of knowledge.
In the book on Spiritual Gifts, a collection of sermons by Smith Wigglesworth (1859-1947), who received the baptism of the Spirit in 1907[1], the gift is described as a quickening that gives understanding of the Scriptures[2]:
It is as we feed o the Word and medidate on the message it contains that the Spirit of God can vitalize what we have received and bring forth through us the word of knowledge... As all the Scriptures were inspired by God (2 Tim 3:16) as they came forth from the beginning, and though the same Spirit they should come forth from us vitalized...
It is unclear if SW think that the essence of the gift is the act of illumination per se, or if it also must include a speaking forth of the knowledge received to others. The passage in the book is very short and neither exegetically or systematically complete.
A view more in line with the current understanding within the charismatic movement is given in the book Questions & answers on spiritual gifts by Howard Carter (1891-1971).[3] The book consist of stenographic notes from a Q and A session at Hampstead Bible College in London. Carter claims that he received his insights on the gifts during imprisonment as a conscientious objector during world war one.[4]
Carter says on page 43:
The word of knowledge is a participation, to some infinitesimal degree, in the omniscience of God. If the Lord who knows all things, is pleased to reveal to us by His Spirit any fragment of His unlimited knowledge, then we can claim to have this manifestation of the Spirit, which is designated "the word of knowledge".
Furthermore, Carter says, that the fragment may be received by the mind as a thought, but it is not created by the human, only received (page 53). The process is completely supernatural. It is not the by-product of diligent study, nor is it in any way connected to education (page 38, 46, 49-50. (Carter does not despise diligent study, but it is unrelated to the definition of the gift.)
The scope of the knowledge includes everything that God knows, which may be worldly facts as when Jesus saw Natanael sitting under a fig tree (John 1:48) or when Ananias was told about the name of the street where Paul was praying after his encounter with Jesus on the road to Damascus (Acts 9:11) (Carter:45). But what makes this a very eminent gift is that God has used it to reveal His very own nature to the authors of the Bible (Carter:43-44). Carter is, however, clear that no new insights can be given that conflicts with Scripture or appends new doctrines to it (page 23-24).
Revelation about the purpose and plans of God, and of the future are not words of knowledge, but words of wisdom (Carter:17ff).
Carter is very clear that we should not talk about the gift of knowledge or the gift of wisdom, but the gift of the word of knowledge and the word of wisdom (page 20-21), as we are all expected to grow in wisdom and knowledge through a plethora of means.
A very different view is offered by Donald Gee in the book Concerning Spiritual Gifts[5]. The book was originally published 1947, but builds upon earlier works published 10 and 20 years earlier (page 133), and Gee says that his views on this subject "have undergone practically no change".
According to Gee, the word of knowledge is a teaching gift in the church (page 134. However, before he arrives at that conclusion, he has a few words of warning:
The Scriptures provide for the task [of defining the gift] no material that is avowedly and unmistakably a manifestation of the word of knowledge... Assumption is not proof... We ought carefully to avoid dogmatizing on this subject. (page 41)
Having acknowledged the types of supernatural revelations that Carter speaks of in a way that affirms that Carters view indeed was held by many, Gee proceeds to call such revelation prophecy, neither denying its existence or its value (page 42). But when it comes to the definition of the gift, he still begs to differ.
For Gee the setting of 1 Cor 12 is of utmost importance, it is in the gathered Church that the gifts are to be used, whereas most of of Carters examples are from happenings in individual lives. In agreement with Carter, Gee claims that the gift is completely supernatural (page 44f), but it is not "spectacular" (page 45-46).
There come times when the Spirit of revelation is so operating through a teacher exercising an anointed ministry that we become conscious of an illumination transcending all natural ability either to gain or to impart (knowledge). It is in such hours that the sheep hear the voice of their good Shepherd speaking through human lips... We know it because our hearts burn within us as surely as theirs did upon the Emmaus road when Christ "expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself". By the gift of of the Spirit that Voice still expounds the Scriptures on the sweetest of all themes - himself (Gee:46-47)
In the book edition from 1947, Gee has added a whole chapter that was not part of the edition from 10 years before, where he gives a systematic argument in favor of his interpretation. However, those arguments are outside the scope of this question on StackExchange.
In summary we see that although Gee argues strongly for his view and he at least is in some agreement with an influential preacher (although he was not a "teacher") like Wigglesworth, he pleads his case as if he perceives himself to be in a minority view. At least that is how I judge his tone. Thus it seems that Carter's view was more widespread within early pentecostalism. But it did not enjoy complete dominance.
Later teachings (2nd generation pentecostalism/charismatics/neo-pentecostals) are mostly using definitions similar to carter, but they are, according to the teaching I've read and heard, very reluctant to include revelation about the nature of God, and restrict the gift to worldly knowledge.
According to the view within the pentecostal movement. I am aware that this view is not shared by all Christians, but it is a significant fact to date the involvement of SW in pentecostalism.
Wigglesworth, S. (1998). Smith Wigglesworth on spiritual gifts. New Kensignton, PA: Whitaker House. Pages 76-77
Carter, H. (1976). Questions & answers on spiritual gifts. Tulsa, OK: Harrison House.
Off topic fact: Pacifism was very common among the early pentecostals.
Gee, D. (1980). Concerning spiritual gifts. Sprinfield, Mo: Radiant Books.
Upvote:0
I am not versed in theological debate on the gifts, but as a Christian Seer, I can tell you the likely evidence of this gift from a great deal of personal experience. The Word of Knowledge, to my personal experience are typically audibly heard words or impressions within one's mindspace that as a believer I encounter both in prayer, and on a daily basis as I am going about my day with God. They are highly symbolic, using the same "language" as that of dreams. Many times I will receive these "insights" from the Holy Spirit while studying the Word, or while in prayer. Sometimes I simply get them while I'm doing something in my daily life that has to do with some sort of narrative or parabolic experience. The typical purpose of these words is not confined to healing; but rather to divine communication, teaching/strengthening/confirming the Word of God, and the learning of prophetic symbolic vocabulary as so to strengthen divine dialogue.
More post
- π Why are the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of Mary such a big deal that all Catholics must believe in them?
- π Is there a Church Father or Doctor of the Church who wrote that Judas Iscariot was saved?
- π What was God the Father like, when he was a man?
- π Where does the Bible stand on vegetarianism?
- π Who first explicitly understood "works of the law" in Galatians 3:10 as referring to only the ritual law, and not the Mosaic law generally?
- π What was the purpose of creating the world?
- π What biblical or historical reasons have been given for avoiding creeds & catechisms?
- π Why couldn't a person in the OT be both priest and king?
- π Connection between the serpent in the garden of Eden and the brass serpent
- π What is the Biblical basis for multiple judgments after death?
- π Satan and language
- π Did Moses see the face of God?
- π According to the Mormon doctrines, who created the universe?
- π Why do we wish "peace" to each other during Mass?
- π How did Christians respond to abortion in the early Church?
- π Who goes to heaven?
- π What are the main differences between the Seventh Day Adventist church and the Worldwide Church of God?
- π In the LDS church what is the process of calling a new prophet?
- π Has a papyrus been found that was written by a disciple of Jesus?
- π What level of submission do Catholics give to random things the Pope says?
- π Does Catholicism teach that Jesus was a theistic evolutionist?
- π Is Baptism of a child still valid if one of the pouring during baptism misses?
- π How has opinion on the death penalty among American Catholics shifted since 1974?
- π Other than JWs, which denominations (or religions) recognize God's personal name as the form "Jehovah"?
- π We will judge angels? But we are lower than the angels
- π Water Baptism - Is it still necessary?
- π Source of the view that the human will is necessitated but not coerced
- π Does current Church doctrine/law allow the veneration of a saint's social media accounts?
- π What is the cross in the mantra "carry your own cross"?
- π Harshness and nihilism
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π What was the definition of the spiritual gift of the word of Knowledge in early pentecostalism?
- π When the early church was formalising the canon, what did they understand by the word 'Inspired'?
- π How was the gift of the word of knowledge defined by the pioneers of the pentecostal healing revival?
- π What is the basis for saying that the Gospel of Thomas was accepted as scripture by early Christians?
- π What was Martin Luther's perspective on the early Christian church?
- π What was Jerome's defense for translating the Hebrew word Χ§Φ΄ΧΧ§ΦΈΧΧΦΉΧ (kikayon) in Jonah 4:6, etc. into Latin as hedera?
- π What was the role of Apollos in the early church?
- π What was the socioeconomic makeup of early Christian Gnostic sects?
- π What was the Early Churchβs view on socialism?
- π What was the first Spiritual Gifts Inventory book published or who was the first to use the method?
- π What was the general opinion of the Early Church Fathers concerning the giants/nephilims?
- π What was the Early Church's (ante-Nicene period) view of the interplay between free will (or lack thereof) and salvation?
- π What was the Early Church Fathersβ teachings on the death penalty?
- π What is the Biblical view of "the spiritual gift of leadership"?
- π What was the early Church's understanding of the practice of "praying in the Spirit" during the ante-Nicene period?
- π What was the early American church like?
- π What was the early Church Fathers' understanding of the "baptism with Holy Spirit and fire"?
- π What was the Early Church Fathers' view of female teachers in the Church?
- π Prior to the burning bush event - what was Moses's knowledge of God?
- π What was the early Coptic doctrine for beliefs in the afterlife?
- π What was the Early Church's position on Purgatory?
- π What was the early churches view on head-covering for women?
- π What was the Early Church's view on slavery?
- π What was the Early Church's view of sexual immorality and sex outside of marriage?
- π What was the original word used to imply goodness at Mark 10:17-18?
- π From a Fundamentalist standpoint, what does the phrase "Inspired, infallible, inerrant Word of God" mean?
- π What was it about the death of Jesus that allows God to forgive us?
- π What denominations, besides JWs, hold that the Star of Bethlehem was sent by Satan?
- π Was tithing 10% required or encouraged by the early church?
- π When in the development of trinitarian doctrine was the word "persons" first applied to God?