What is the Biblical Basis for monothelitism?

score:2

Accepted answer

Any scripture used to oppose Nestorianism can argue for Monothelitism

As WLC notes in the quote you provide, any doctrine that were to imply that Christ had not only 2 natures (divine and human) but in fact was two 'persons' would fall into the heresy of Nestorianism. Craig then suggests that two distinct wills in Christ would require him to be two distinct persons and therefore, verses like John 1:14 ("The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us") which treat Christ as if he were one person can be used in favor of only one will. Arguments like these could go on, but ultimately rest on the assumption that to have a distinct will is to be a distinct person. This makes it a semantic debate over the meaning of will and person, not over specific passages of scripture.

Some of the strongest arguments come from the Council of Alexandria (430 AD), which was convened to specifically to condemn Nestorianism, and includes 12 anathemas to that effect. This council cites John 1:14 and clarifies what this verse implies, that Jesus is worshiped as one person the God-man, and it is inappropriate to distinguish between the divine and human (as saying Jesus possessed 2 wills might do) and say Jesus the man is worshipped "with" the Son.

If anyone dares to say that the man who was assumed ought to be worshiped and glorified together with the Divine Word and be called God along with Him, while being separate from Him, (for the addition of "with" must always compel us to think in this way), and will not rather worship Emmanuel with one veneration and send up to Him one doxology, even as "the Word became flesh", let him be anathema. (see)

The first reference with biblical origin included in the council's anathemas is to the term "Emmanuel" found in Matthew 1:23. The Council points out that if the one person Jesus is called 'God with us' it is inappropriate to then distinguish between the man whom Mary bore and the second person of the trinity who is God. Therefore, the Council declares "that the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God".

Perhaps the best reference in favor of Monothelitism is the Council's citation of Hebrews 1:3, "...fix your thoughts on Jesus, whom we acknowledge as our apostle and high priest." (NIV) Here, the unity of the person of Christ is seen to be necessary for the sufficiency of his atonement. More importantly, the council notes that as high priest "He offered Himself to God the Father". The verb 'to offer' is here used in the sense of giving, but this does not remove its secondary connotations which imply an intention or a 'willingness' to do something (see Merriam-Webster). This anathema then seems to imply that Hebrews' casting of Jesus as high priest requires his offering of himself to be a single act of will by one person. This only makes sense under Monothelitism.

More post

Search Posts

Related post