Is there an argument that God, as a self-proving entity, is necessary for logic?
score:8
I think you're referring to The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG). It was first formulated by Immanuel Kant, but has been refined, disputed and defended over the years.
The argument
One formulation of the argument is,
Prove A: The Christian God exists.
Step 1 ~A: (Assume the opposite of what we are trying to prove): The Christian God does not exist.
Step 2 (~A--> B): If God does not exist, then there is no intelligible experience since God is the precondition of intelligibility
Step 3 (~B): There is intelligible experience (Contradiction!)
Step 4 (~ ~A): It is not the case that God does not exist (Modus Tollens on 2 and 3)
Step 5 (A): --> God does exist (Law of negation.)Source: Reformed Apologist (blog)
The finer details of whether this argument actually is valid, of course, need a more thorough explanation. The argument isn't fundamentally based on inductive nor deductive, but transcendental reasoning. Kant describes transcendental as follows:
I entitle transcendental all knowledge which is occupied not so much with objects as with the mode of our knowledge of objects insofar as this mode of knowledge is to be possible a priori.
Thus to properly examine and understand the argument, I suspect a more in-depth studying is required. I'm not a philosopher and don't claim to understand TAG, so I'll just point you elsewhere:
Further reading
Butler, Michael R. The Transcendental Argument for God's Existence.
Upvote:0
Indeed, for logic and any other knowledge to exist, there should be directly experienced thing that does not need proving. Yet it is not evident that this thing should necessary have properties, which are attributed by Christians to God.
As metaphysics tells us via Anthropic principle, it is existence of self that is needed for logic and any experimental facts to exist. In other words, for the universe to exist there should be an observer, for logic to exist, the observer should be conscious.
It is possible to compare the properties of the self and Christian God.
Christian God creates the Universe consciously.
The self while necessary for Universe to exist, has limited abilities to affect it consciously.
Christian God is almighty
The self is not almighty definitely. It has limited abilities to affect the things in the universe (freedom of will) though. However, such ability guarantees that the Universe is neither deterministic nor random (free will is incompatible with both determinism and randomness, see Peter van Inwagen).
Christian god does not obey physical laws
The self also does not obey the usual physical laws. Even more, there can be no universally valid physical theory, that is theory that correctly describes a system that contains the self (see Thomas Breuer). Yet this disobedience has own limits: on practice it is usually manifested by the existence of principally non-measurable parameters (subjective decoherence, see Breuer).
Christian God is immortal.
It is unknown whether the self is immortal. Either case, death of the self means disappearance of the universe. There are suggested quite plausible mechanisms through which the self may be immortal.
Upvote:1
that in order for logic to be valid, one could not have circular arguments...
Bad Logic does not prove that logic does not exist. At the very least all it proves is that bad logic exist.
but since you can't prove your premises, all arguments had to be unfounded or circular unless you introduced God as some sort of self-proving entity.
This is a very broad generalization. Why can't the theist prove their arguments. Kalaam Cosmological argument seems like good proof to me. It is a in depth discussion, but to think Christian notion of God is circular would need quiet a bit of explaining. (to say the least)
(e.g. why it is okay for God to effectively be a circular argument but not for anything else to be)
It would not be good for it to be circular, but where has the Christian God committed circular logic? The skeptic needs some argument to support that view because I'm not aware of any argument for God's existence that is circular.
Does this argument have a name, and is it (or at least a summary) written somewhere?
Not that I'm aware of. It is the first time I have heard of someone thinking the notion of a God commits circular logic.
I'm not quiet sure how to answer this objection because the OP makes some assertions but does not back it up with something substantial to support the claim
I suspect that some strawmanning of arguments are to blame for this
More post
- 📝 Will there be "new people" or reproduction in heaven or "the next life?"
- 📝 Jehovah's Witnesses teach Jesus was created and he's "a god" according to John 1:1 in their NWT. Yet the Bible teaches all men are sinners?
- 📝 Blood transfusions and Christianity?
- 📝 Are white lies sometime justified?
- 📝 Why do high-church people call their personalized Bible study exercises "devotionals"?
- 📝 Do self-identified Christian fundamentalists have their own geographical communities?
- 📝 What would happen if the Pope were to abuse his power?
- 📝 Where do the names of books of Bible come from?
- 📝 Could parts of the bible have been lost over time?
- 📝 Why is God the Father referred to as "Eternal Father" in LDS writings when He is not believed to be eternal?
- 📝 Why does St. Peter use the phraseology "killed by hanging on a tree" while referring to the crucifixion of Jesus?
- 📝 Do some Christian churches worship the saints and/or angels?
- 📝 Book of revelation what is wormwood?
- 📝 Who goes to heaven?
- 📝 Is "the observer on earth" view common among Creationists?
- 📝 Ignorance of Adam and Eve
- 📝 Did God promise to appoint prophets in each generation?
- 📝 What is the Septuagint?
- 📝 What specific thing in the Bible separates the Old Testament from the New Testament?
- 📝 does God know the people that are going to hell?
- 📝 Are the persons nominated to be created cardinals eligible to participate in the conclave before the consistory?
- 📝 What is the significance of transubstantiation?
- 📝 There are at-least 4 Gospel Books; did anyone ever think they were describing More than One Jesus?
- 📝 Did Joshua worshiped the Ark of the Covenant?
- 📝 What is the official Catholic view of a feminine element within the Trinity?
- 📝 Does the holiness of a person grow over time?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, if we sin and become repentant will our sins be forgiven too like St. Peter?
- 📝 What is the significance of the four laws given to early Christians who were not ethnically Jews?
- 📝 Which Reformation theologians used the analogy of water and ink for sin?
- 📝 Female Sunday School teachers for 17, 18 year old male students?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there an argument that God, as a self-proving entity, is necessary for logic?
- 📝 What evidence is there that God as father was a common concept for Jesus's first century Jewish audience?
- 📝 Are there any denominations that give official advice on how to win atheists for Christ who are very strong in philosophy, logic and skepticism?
- 📝 Is there a name for the belief that God is not omniscient, but rather is "learning" how to deal with humanity?
- 📝 Why is it not that a state divorce is actually an argument AGAINST a church annulment petition rather than a necessary condition for such petition?
- 📝 Is there a Biblical basis for not believing that Global Warming is occurring?
- 📝 Are there Old Testament Scriptures that mention salvation for the Gentiles?
- 📝 Are there theological explanations for why God allowed ambiguity to exist in Scripture?
- 📝 What is the argument and Biblical basis that it is possible to know God from nature?
- 📝 What evidence is there to support the position that the Bible is truly the Word of God to mankind?
- 📝 Is there a biblical basis for God calling one to place one's career above their other duties?
- 📝 Is there any biblical justification for referring to God as Mother?
- 📝 Is there any evidence for the claim that the Catholic church suppressed translation of Scripture?
- 📝 What is the biblical argument for eating meat, or that vegetarianism is possible but not commanded?
- 📝 What is the basis for believing that the wrath of God is not an accommodation?
- 📝 What is the basis for the idea that the Song of Solomon is about the relationship between God and the church?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that God likes or feels affection toward us?
- 📝 Is there a name for the belief that some individuals would always freely reject salvation no matter the world in which they are created?
- 📝 Is there a recognised soteriology that combines selective election for some and general election for everyone else?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the Athanasian Creed's statement that believing in the Trinity is necessary for salvation?
- 📝 What is the basis for the Swedenborgian view that the most common concept of God in Christianity (the Trinity) is a belief in three gods?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that God loves individuals?
- 📝 Is there historical evidence for an atheist argument about the New Testament?
- 📝 Is there a doctrine or Biblical justification that explains why God chose the number 7 to be so significant?
- 📝 Is there any tradition that argues for prophetical succession under the Old Testament just like some argue for Apostolic succession?
- 📝 Is there Biblical support for the concept that 'Whenever a man lies with a woman...a transcendental relation is set up between them'?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for believing that God punishes Christians for disobedience?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the belief that there are humans in heaven now?
- 📝 Is there a term for a theological principle that if a New Testament text is unclear about something, that point is not important for salvation?
- 📝 On what basis was Jesus’ death sufficient for redemption according Non-Trinitarians who maintain that Jesus was not eternal God as God the Father is?