Is there a link between Socinianism and Sir Isaac Newton's conclusion to his Principia Mathematica (1687) where he attacks the Trinity doctrine?
score:5
It seems to me that Newton is 'sitting on the fence' and acting as a spectator to the arguments regarding the Person and the Deity of Christ. He writes that he can observe in the early Church (due to the presence of what he calls 'Nazarenes') that two camps existed and accepted one another's presence in the early Church, so he maintains :
The Nazarenes, as Newton explains in this manuscript, did not believe Christ existed before his birth in Bethlehem. Although Newton crossed it out and chose a passive verb instead, his original words “I do not” are revealing. He goes on to point out that those “who believed that Jesus took his beginning from the Virgin Mary” and those “who believed that Jesus was before the world began … conversed together as brethren & communicated with one another as members of the Church catholick till the days of Justin Martyr, without falling out about their different opinions.”
Isaac Newton - Socinianism and the One True God p281
This is a common argument in many matters of division, to suggest that the argument, does not, in fact, matter and that whichever side of the division one may wish to choose makes no difference to one's spiritual state.
This attitude gives the impression of being 'charitable' - avoiding conflict by argument - but the apostle James discounts this view by making it clear that one is to 'earnestly contend for the faith once delivered to the saints'.
All heresies can be excused if one can argue that both sides of a division were allowed in the early Church and both parties had mutual fellowship and communion.
Further, the article goes on to state that Newton uses an argument which is also used by Socinians, regarding the terms 'God' and 'Lord' expressed in the Old Testament writings.
But this is not all. In the third (1726) edition of the Principia, Newton added a note on the word “God” that expands his meaning:
Dr. Poc**k derives the Latin word Deus from the Arabic du (in the oblique case di,) which signifies Lord. And in this sense Princes are called Gods, Psal. lxxxii. ver. 6; and John x. ver. 35. And Moses is called a God to his brother Aaron, and a God to Pharaoh (Exod. iv. ver. 16; and vii. ver. 1 [sic; 8]). And in the same sense the souls of dead princes were formerly, by the Heathens, called gods, but falsely, because of their want of dominion.182 In equating the term “God” with “Lord” (a word that straightforwardly refers to dominion), Newton once again stresses that the chief characteristic of “God” or “gods” is dominion. This attempt to present the terms “God” and “Lord” as equivalent mirrors the already-quoted lines from the Racovian Catechism on the God of dominion. The position that persons other than the True God can be termed “God” is a also standard Socinian position and it is expressed in the very same chapter of Crell’s De Deo specified in 1714 by John Edwards.
For both Newton and the Socinians, this conception of dominion also explained how the Son of God could be called God and not be “very God” in the Nicene formulation. Three out of the four biblical passages used by Newton in this note are also utilised by Crell for the same purpose in the same chapter of De Deo. 184 Additionally, the point about false and imaginary Gods can be located in similar form in Crell’s Concerning One God the Father. 185 Finally, the argument on the communicability of the term “God”, along with the scriptural references used by Newton in the note on God, can be found commonly elsewhere in the Socinian corpus.
From my reading of this article, I am left with the distinct impression that Isaac Newton believed both Trinitarians and Socinians fellowshipped together in the early Church and that Isaac Newton appears to regard Deity as monotheistic, yet he does not explicitly say so.
It seems from the article that Isaac Newton did not regard himself under any obligation nor did he have any personal motivation in, himself, declaring his own faith regarding Jesus Christ.
He appears to be stating, that it does not matter and therefore he is not going to reveal what he, himself, believes.
Upvote:5
Yes, there appears to be a link between Socinianism and Sir Isaac Newton’s views on the Trinity. I say “appears” because Newton was careful to conceal his theology. Extracts taken from this link https://isaacnewtonstheology.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/theology-of-general-scholium.pdf present evidence from recent studies to show that Newton supported Samuel Clarke, “whose unorthodox Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity had appeared in 1712”.
The document is a pre-publication version of Stephen D. Snobelen’s “’God of gods, and Lord of lords’: the theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia”, published by Osiris 16 (2001).
Newton not only must have intended the General Scholium to present unorthodox theological, philosophical and linguistic argumentation, but that in so doing was informed by one of the most heretical movements of the period. (p. 3)
The theology presented in the Scholium is certainly compatible with Arianism—which taught a Supreme High God and a lesser created god Christ—and we know from his manuscripts that the Christology at which Newton arrived closely resembled this fourth-century doctrinal position. (p. 18)
Calvinist John Edwards claimed that Newton had taken his arguments about God from chapter 13 of the Socinian Johann Crell’s De Deo et ejus attributis (Concerning God and his attributes). Edwards implied that Newton
shares his usage of the epithet “Supreme God” (Deus summus) in the General Scholium with not only the Arians but also the Socinians, both of whom need to employ the qualification summus “to distinguish the Father from the Son, who they hold to be an Inferior God”. (pp 19-20)
Newton himself owned at least eight Socinian books... Put another way, Newton and the Socinians shared a common theological ethos. (p.21)
Snobelen concludes that the General Scholium “was constructed with exoteric and esoteric text” and that “the deeper meanings of the General Scholium were not meant for everyone.” Newton had to exercise care “in matters of religious heterodoxy”.
From the evidence presented in the article partially quoted above, it is clear that Newton's anti-trinitarianism is a form of Socinianism. It also appears that Newton went to considerable lengths to keep his Arian and anti-trinitarian views hidden so as to avoid public criticism.
More post
- 📝 Did the Early Church Fathers believe in praying for the dead?
- 📝 Where I can find the complete Psalms?
- 📝 Promises of God that help us partake in His divine nature
- 📝 What do Catholics mean when they talk about the Real Presence in the Eucharist?
- 📝 Was God discovered or did He reveal Himself?
- 📝 How can a Christian effectively explain the seeming contradiction between Gen 1:31 and Gen 6:6?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus was the "second Adam"?
- 📝 According to Southern Baptists, where does a baby's soul come from?
- 📝 Should a Christian wear clothing of mixed fibers?
- 📝 How is the election of Adam and Eve according to the Calvinist?
- 📝 Do we know more details about the act of Jesus' birth beyond Luke 2?
- 📝 Who are the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses church?
- 📝 What theological statement would be made if the Creeds preceded the homily?
- 📝 Did Martin Luther and Zwingli not consider each other brothers in Christ?
- 📝 Is Jesus talking about supererogatory merit in Matt 5:38-48? i.e. earning a reward rather than sin
- 📝 From a Catholic viewpoint, why will there be a particular judgement and a general judgment?
- 📝 According to Trinitarian theology of Calvinism, was the Word (2nd person of the Trinity) missing from heaven when He (the Word) incarnated on Earth?
- 📝 Where did Chesterton's idea that a heresy was a fixation on a particular virtue within Christianity come from?
- 📝 Is there acceptable pride based on Galatians 6:4 and if so how is it different than regular pride?
- 📝 Did Paul preach Jesus's message?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for switching between the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit as recipients during prayer?
- 📝 How do Roman Catholics interpret 1 Timothy 4:3
- 📝 The Servetus Controversy: What was Calvin's involvement?
- 📝 Who found whom? After Jesus FINDS Philip, why does Philip tell Nathanael "We have FOUND the One..."?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses understand Hebrews 1?
- 📝 How do YECs interpret waters above the expanse in Genesis 1?
- 📝 St Augustine's saying on redemption
- 📝 Which verse mentions "Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God."?
- 📝 On what Biblical basis did Mormon prophet Joseph Smith teach that the "Ancient of Days" at Daniel 7:22 is the first man Adam?
- 📝 How long did it take to form the Biblical canon?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Is there a link between Socinianism and Sir Isaac Newton's conclusion to his Principia Mathematica (1687) where he attacks the Trinity doctrine?
- 📝 Was there a paradigm shift in Jesus' interaction with women between the beginning and end of his public life
- 📝 Is there any Biblical Basis for 400 years of silence between Old and New Testament?
- 📝 Are there theological differences between the Greek Orthodox church and the Coptic (Egyptian) Orthodox church?
- 📝 Is there a significant difference between salvation by faith with works and salvation by faith and works?
- 📝 Was there doctrinal difference between Lollards and Waldenses?
- 📝 Is there a difference between Liberal, Progressive, and Emergent Christianity?
- 📝 Is there a difference between prayer and petition?
- 📝 Is there any correlation between national prosperity and percentage of Christians?
- 📝 Is there a special name for the day between Easter and Good Friday?
- 📝 Are there any differences between Jesus's commandments and God's commandments?
- 📝 Christian view of why there are so many similarities between Quran and Bible?
- 📝 Is there any connection between minimum age for marriage in Catholic Church and tradition about Mary's age at Annunciation?
- 📝 Is there a difference between Scripture and inspired writings?
- 📝 What is the argument supporting that there is a break between the 69th and 70th week in the book of Daniel?
- 📝 Is there any ancient or modern connection between the word "sin" and the sport of archery?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians respond to passages in the Bible that seem to clearly distinguish between God and Jesus after his ascension?
- 📝 How much time elapsed between Jesus's betrayal by Judas and His crucifixion?
- 📝 Why does St. Paul say that a husband is "divided" between his wife and God?
- 📝 Are there any differences between Protestant and Catholic theology concerning the distinction between demonic possession from mental illness?
- 📝 What differences are there between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox understanding of the sacrament of marriage?
- 📝 Was there any meaningful difference between the terms "presbyter" and "priest" in early Christianity?
- 📝 Is there a difference of substance between the veneration of Mary, and the worship of God?
- 📝 According to paedobaptists, what justifies a link between circumcision and baptism since both males and females are baptised?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, is there a distinction between paradise and heaven?
- 📝 Where did Jesus go and what did he do between His Death and Resurrection?
- 📝 Is there any real significant difference between Protestantism and Catholicism?
- 📝 Are there disagreements between Reformed Theology and the teachings of A.W. Tozer?
- 📝 Is there any connection between the country of origin of Popes and nearby large gatherings of Catholics or Councils?
- 📝 Is there a difference between celebrating Mass for a living person and for a deceased one?