How does LDS theology suffer when Book of Mormon historical claims are unsupported?
Upvote:5
What impact is made within LDS theology regarding the spiritual content of the Book of Mormon when the historical claims therein are shown by both secular and Mormon scholars to be factually unsupported?
None. Just as the bible is not an archaeological/scientific text (garden of Eden, Noah flood, etc), the Book of Mormon is not as well. It like the Bible is a religious text. Archaeological/historic evidence is nice to have but not necessary (though plenty of evidence exists IMO-see related questions mentioned in OP comments). The Book of Mormon's purpose from the title page:
And also to the convincing of the Jew and Gentile that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself unto all nations—And now, if there are faults they are the mistakes of men; wherefore, condemn not the things of God, that ye may be found spotless at the judgment-seat of Christ.
I'll restate: Since we do not know exactly where the Book of Mormon took place, it should not surprise anyone that archaeology and anthropology professors do not believe that it has any support in the New World.
In response to Richard Matheny's quotes:
"I would say in evaluating the Book of Mormon that it has no place in the New World whatsoever."
He clarified this message in "Basic Methodological Problems with the AntiMormon Approach to the Geography and Archaeology of the Book of Mormon," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 2/1 (1993), pp.190-191 ... he answered as if he were a non-Mormon archaeologist
I received a copy of Heart and Mind and a copy of a letter sent to you by Luke P. Wilson, Executive Director of Gospel Truths Ministries. From these items I feel some obligation to give you a little more information about what took place at the Sunstone symposium in 1984. . . .
I had no idea that I was being used by Gospel Truths Ministries to discredit the LDS Church in their publication. . . . In 1984 I was asked by Sunstone to give a talk, which I refused. They persisted by calling and asked if I would be willing to sit on a panel and comment on papers that would be given on archaeology at the upcoming symposium. To this request I consented. However, when I arrived for the symposium, much to my surprise I was listed as a speaker. I objected and said that I had not prepared a paper. The Sunstone people then handed me a card with a question on it and asked if I would comment on the question. The question dealt with how does a non-Mormon archaeologist evaluate the Book of Mormon in terms of its cultural content and claims. My answer to the question was an ad hoc response where I tried to put myself in a non-Mormon’s professional shoes and talked about the nature of the problems that the Book of Mormon poses for the archaeologist. . . .
Gospel Truths Ministries is using my ad hoc response without my permission, without my knowledge, and in a pernicious way against the church, and against me. The letter sent to you said that a complete transcript of my response was forwarded to you. I don’t know what GT Ministries means by a “complete” transcript. I forbade any publication of my response by Sunstone or any one else, and did not authorize any tape recordings at the time.
emphasis mine
also of note is these quotes are from 1984 (~40 years ago) and more evidence has emerged and as it has in the past, emerging evidence won't convince anyone
Upvote:7
Without the Book of Mormon, nothing at all remains. If the Book of Mormon is true, Joseph is a prophet and everything else that entails. If it's not true, then so is the claim that Joseph is a prophet, and everything comes crashing down. It might still be a good spiritual book, but of human origin (and of a human who then wrongly claimed to be a prophet).
Joseph Smith himself stated:
“Take away the Book of Mormon and the revelations, and where is our religion? We have none” (Minutes and Discourse, 21 April 1834, Church History Library, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City).
That being said, there are several things that keep "unsupported historical claims" from actually being back breaking.
First, and most obvious, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. New discoveries are made all the time, for better or worse. For example:
FAIR on the topic of metal plates:
When it first appeared, the Book of Mormon was attacked for the alleged absurdity of having been written on golden plates and its claim of the existence of an early sixth century B.C. version of the Hebrew Bible written on brass plates. Today, however, there are numerous examples of ancient writing on metal plates. Ironically, some now claim instead that knowledge of such plates was readily available in Joseph Smith's day. Hugh Nibley's 1952 observation seems quite prescient: "it will not be long before men forget that in Joseph Smith's day the prophet was mocked and derided for his description of the plates more than anything else."
Second, it's actually unclear where the Book of Mormon exactly takes place. In other words, there is no really specific claim as to the location. That it's Mesoamerica is a theory that is currently the most popular, but it's not the first and only one. Even if a "historical claim" was disproven without a doubt(which I doubt is possible due to the first point), it only really means that a theory as to the location of the events in the Book of Mormon is disproven.
Since the publication of the Book of Mormon in 1830, members and leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have expressed numerous opinions about the specific locations of the events discussed in the book. Some believe that the history depicted in the Book of Mormon—with the exception of the events in the Near East—occurred in North America, while others believe that it occurred in Central America or South America. Although Church members continue to discuss such theories today, the Church’s only position is that the events the Book of Mormon describes took place in the ancient Americas.
In conclusion, I would say actually disproving the Book of Mormon on historical grounds seems, to me, not very possible.
More post
- 📝 How do those who believe in a dual system (Old & New Covenant simultaneously operative) pre-70 AD understand "one Lord, one faith, one baptism"?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church have a position on slavery reparations?
- 📝 How do Roman Catholics explain their change in Eschatology?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church explain why Jesus only appeared in short apparitions to his followers post-resurrection?
- 📝 Why doesn't the Catholic church have prophets and apostles?
- 📝 To "once saved always saved" advocates, what does it mean that church leaders "keep watch over our souls"?
- 📝 How do creationists explain the genetic diversity of animals after Noah's Ark?
- 📝 Why do some translations render Genesis 3:8 with "the voice of the Lord" while others don't? Is it a reference to Jesus?
- 📝 Origin of the quote "If he'd had anything more precious, he'd have given it"
- 📝 Canticle of Zachariah daily? Why?
- 📝 Is there a bad part of heaven?
- 📝 Has Peter Lombard ever been venerated in the Catholic Church?
- 📝 Why does the Holy Spirit not take the form of a human being just like Jesus did?
- 📝 According to LDS is there a fixed and finite number of human beings?
- 📝 How do proponents of the perpetual virginity of Mary view Matthew 13:53–57?
- 📝 Does the Bible give the reasons (if any) for God choosing Abraham?
- 📝 Is a Roman Catholic allowed by Church law to receive sacraments from other Churches in full communion with Rome?
- 📝 Did the atonement end on the Cross?
- 📝 Man Exists in earth
- 📝 What is a practical Catholic definition of conscience?
- 📝 What pronoun do Catholics typically use to refer to the Eucharist?
- 📝 What Did the "Geneva Reformers" Have Against Exodus 2:22?
- 📝 Is David's Love for Jonathan erotic?
- 📝 What is the difference between an apostle and a disciple?
- 📝 Where in the Bible does it say we have a sin nature?
- 📝 According to Trinitarian theology, does God the Father have a God?
- 📝 A female demon name starting with the letter "S"
- 📝 What core LDS doctrine(s) contradict the Protestant doctrine of salvation by grace through faith?
- 📝 Is abortion okay if it is medically necessary?
- 📝 In Catholic teaching, to what scripture is each of the seven sacraments referenced?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How does LDS theology suffer when Book of Mormon historical claims are unsupported?
- 📝 Are there any conflicts between how Jesus is described in the Book of Mormon vs how He is described in the Bible?
- 📝 How many witnesses are there who physically saw and/or touched the golden plates from which the Book of Mormon was reportedly translated?
- 📝 How many different groups are there that base their teachings on the Book of Mormon and/or Joseph Smith?
- 📝 Does the Book of Mormon (& LDS doctrine) pass the test found in 1 John 4:2 as the true spirit of God?
- 📝 How does the LDS church respond to the similarities between the book of Nephi and the book of Napoleon?
- 📝 How does LDS doctrine reconcile monotheism with men becoming gods?
- 📝 How is one supposed to "know" whether or not the Book of Mormon is true?
- 📝 What important Mormon doctrines are taught in the book of Mormon that we couldn't find in the Bible already?
- 📝 How can things considered bad when done by humans become good when God does them?
- 📝 How does the LDS Church decide what is included in their scriptural canon?
- 📝 How can we be sure our specific Christian confession is true, when every other Christian group claims that it's not?
- 📝 Are translations of the book of Mormon into other languages made from English, or are the golden plates stashed in a temple somewhere?
- 📝 On the topic of marriage in heaven, how does the LDS church reconcile Matthew 22:23-33?
- 📝 What actions does the LDS church (Mormon) take when a member does not pay tithing?
- 📝 How does the LDS doctrine of assurance compare to the Methodist doctrine of assurance?
- 📝 According to the LDS Church (Mormons), how specifically did Joseph Smith translate the Book of Mormon?
- 📝 How sound are the arguments that Melchizedek invoked a Canaanite deity when he met Abraham?
- 📝 How does one become an Apostle in the LDS Church?
- 📝 From a LDS perspective, when does the Holy Ghost get a Physical Body?
- 📝 Assuming the Book of Mormon is historically accurate, does this necessarily imply the Great Apostasy?
- 📝 How was the translation of the Book of Mormon shown through Joseph Smith's seer stones and hat?
- 📝 What evidence does the LDS Church offer regarding claims of degradation of Biblical texts?
- 📝 How does our work on this earth transfer into the new earth when God returns?
- 📝 Does The Book of Mormon contain Jewish literary techniques?
- 📝 How does a Christian reject another's theology without rejecting their faith?
- 📝 Does God want things? What are some of the things He wants, and how did we find out?
- 📝 Into how many languages has the Book of Mormon been translated?
- 📝 How are the teachings in the Book of James consistent with Salvation by Grace alone?
- 📝 The Mormon Church teaches that Joseph Smith saw God the Father and His Son. How do you reconcile this when the Bible says the Father cannot be seen?