Why is there not a single date in the Bible?

score:33

Accepted answer

The "AD/BC" way of counting dates that you want dates to 525 AD by Dionysius Exiguus. Prior to that, people kept time in "regnal" time, meaning that they would count the Xth year of the reign of Y. Since the Old Testament was pretty much complete by 400BC (nearly a milennia earlier) and the New Testament by 95 AD, it would be every bit as odd to see an "AD/BC" date as would to see a reference to Miley Cyrus in the text.

The Bible has many, many "regnal" dates, perhaps most famously in Luke:

And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed. (And this taxing was first made when Cyrenius was governor of Syria.)

1 & 2 Kings does a lot of this as well:

16:23 In the thirty and first year of Asa king of Judah began Omri to reign over Israel, twelve years: six years reigned he in Tirzah.

Even the prophet Haggai gave us specific dates:

In the second year of Darius the king, in the sixth month, in the first day of the month, came the word of the Lord by Haggai the prophet unto Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, governor of Judah, and to Joshua the son of Josedech, the high priest, saying

These are the dates you should be looking for.

Finally, as a simple thought exercise - remember this. BC dates are before Christ. If you knew that you were living in, say, 587 BC, you'd know that the Messiah would be arriving in, oh, 587 years. Kind of removes the need for a prophetic word of God, don't you think?

Update: What about months?

The Hebrew Calendar has 13 months with different non-Roman names. (Or, more precisely, years in which there are two months of Adar) Even today, many countries use different calendars with different month names. Here in Esther, we read:

In the first month (that is, the month of Nisan), in the twelfth year of King Ahasuerus’ reign, pur (that is, the lot) was cast before Haman in order to determine a day and a month. It turned out to be the twelfth month (that is, the month of Adar).

Remember, the Romans didn't even bother to name two of their months, and most of them were ordinal (Sept=7, Oct=8, Nov=9, Dec=10). Months just aren't that important to an agrarian society. They care about seasons - planting, harvesting, starving. Dates are of concern to bureaucrats and historians - and history to a Greek person would be totally different than to a modern (read Herodutus!) Asking "Why no dates" really is like asking a farmer why he doesn't wear a watch, or asking a fish why he doesn't ride a bike.

Upvote:4

Just to add one more example:

In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw the Lord, high and exalted, seated on a throne; and the train of his robe filled the temple.
Isaiah 6:1

This form of dating was extremely common in the ancient world. In some respects, it is better that they did this instead of their own calendar dates, because those really only mean something if there is a reference point. Imagine you came to a brand new world and they decided to tell you a story. They then say that story occurred on the 6th day in the 3rd month of the 500th year. The natural question is 500th year in relation to what?

In these cases, these people expect that their king and when he lived, ruled, and died, are well known. For the most part they are, so historians often use other sources to create a relative timeline and they often usually are able to relate it to our own calendar in a roundabout way. Then they just use simple math to determine the dates for everything. For example, this work might be dated by knowing that another work mentions King Uzziah in relation to another king or event that we have already dated. That helps us date this work. Also, sometime ancient works mention celestial signs, such as eclipses. We can calculate when those would have occurred with a great deal of accuracy.

We do this today in our current system too. Our years start counting from the year Jesus was born (approximately).

You also should keep in mind that precision like we expect today was not expected out of historians in centuries past. Often getting "close enough" was good enough. Today, History is an effort to catalog facts. In most ancient writings there is usually a purpose to the writing, such as keeping the culture and religion of the people alive and known, which is the first objective. Then the facts kind of just find their way in there. There are exceptions, but in general, ancient writings are just not as meticulous.

Upvote:14

But there are dates in the Bible, and as all dates, they are relative to something. In this case, relative to the reign of a king:

Nehemia 2:1

1 And it came to pass in the month Nisan, in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes the king [...]

Jeremiah 1:2

2 To whom the word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah the son of Amon king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign.

I agree though that there are quite few dates in the bible. We still get a general idea of the timeline because it is recorded how long each king lived and reigned. It seems that while recording genealogy was deemed important, recording the exact dates of events was not (so much). The prophets were more concerned with their message, for example.

More post

Search Posts

Related post