What does it mean that "many parts which are plain have been taken away"?
score:2
Joseph Smith claimed "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it has been translated correctly". However, he used the term "translation" rather loosely to refer to the entire process of transmission from the divine source. The idea that his translation of the Bible was done more with the intent to correct understanding than the text is reasonable and consistent with his other practices and expressed attitudes regarding the text of scripture.
The Book of Mormon passage (1 Ne 13:26-28) cited suggests that the corruption of Christian doctrine originated with censorship, and probably at a time even predating our oldest manuscripts. Not only was there a possible loss of books, epistles, and other manuscripts in the Roman persecutions, but Christians themselves may have taken authentic writings to be heretical or otherwise offensive and destroyed or censored them. Such a process would be mostly undetectable and the missing original doctrine unrecoverable by scholarly methods.
The Book of Mormon also claims that the Gentiles would "stumble" because of the loss of these teachings, or perhaps in other words, that they would misinterpret and misunderstand the part they did have. The history of heresies and doctrinal controversies in Christianity suggests that this misunderstanding began at a very early age. It certainly did not help matters when concepts and language which do not appear in the Bible were were imported from Greek philosophy and grafted into Christian theology, sometimes at variance with the plain and express meaning of the scriptures.
James E. Talmage, an early 20th century LDS scholar (also an apostle) in his work "The Great Apostasy" drew from standard sources on the early history of Christianity to document the various changes in Christian doctrine and practice, from an LDS point of view. This is still the most standard work on the subject. It is not quite authoritative but comes closer to it than anything else.
Upvote:1
The answer would be both. There is much evidences within the bible itself that things have been omitted.
1 Chr 29:29 Now the acts of David the king, first and last, behold, they are written in the book of Samuel the seer, and in the book of Nathan the prophet, and in the book of Gad the seer, (KJV)
Num. 21:14 Wherefore it is said in the book of the wars of the Lord, What he did in the Red sea, and in the brooks of Arnon, (KJV)
Jos 10:13, 1 Kng 11:41, 2 Chr 9:29 12:15 20:34 33:19, 1 Cor 5:9, and Jude 1:14 also include missing books we don't have today.
Joseph Smith translation does not cover missing books though, but simply re translates many of the ones we have. There are places though where there are full stories added in. For instance the book of Genesis has several verses added in by Joseph Smith including 15 verses in Genesis 14. The belief held by LDS members and the church is that things were changed, and taken away.
Within the LDS Bible Dictionary there is a whole segment on lost scriptures which can be found here https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bd/lost-books
A little clarification on what Joseph Smith translation includes seems important. it is many edits to verses, but are not included in the biblical text itself but in the form of footnotes, and in the Index in the back of the LDS printing of the KJV. It is believed to be a translation in a similar way the Book of Mormon was translated. It was done by the power of God.
Upvote:4
+1 for the great question! To begin as Members of the LDS Church "We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God." (Article of Faith 8)
Throughout my response I will be referencing Plain and Precious Truths Restored, an article written in October of 2006.
There are multiple doctrines restored with The Book of Mormon. Just to list a few:
- Premortal Existence
- Adam’s Fall and Human Suffering
- Agency
- The Atonement
- First Principles and Ordinances
- Church Organization
- Importance of Personal Revelation
- Satan’s Identity and Methods
One example of a Joseph Smith Translation is Matthew 18:11
KJV: For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
JST of KJV: For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost, and to call sinners to
repentance; but these little ones have no need of repentance, and I will save them.
So in answer to your question, yes. We believe there have been doctrines which have been physically removed from The Bible either by an honest mistake in translation, or a deliberate omission.
-- I am out of time right now to go into more depth, but I would encourage you to read the article I referenced above.
More post
- 📝 Why were the golden plates necessary if Joseph Smith received his translation of the Book of Mormon by viewing a stone in his hat?
- 📝 According to Acts 20:7, which day was the first day of the week?
- 📝 Why did punishment differ in Leviticus 20:13 and 1 Kings 15:11-12?
- 📝 Baby Jesus couldn't exist in "Total Depravity" because he was God?
- 📝 Why are Protestants from the Church of England allowed to divorce?
- 📝 Why did Cardinal Ratzinger stop supporting a literal interpretation of creation in Genesis?
- 📝 Patron saint of professional excellence? Professional excellence and holiness?
- 📝 Are there any compelling reasons to prevent a layperson from administering the bread and wine in accordance with 1 Corinthians 11:17-34?
- 📝 Did GOD create pathogens after the sin of Adam and Eve?
- 📝 Is a indulgence valid if granted the night before?
- 📝 Why did Swedenborg accept any New Testament books?
- 📝 Is "the observer on earth" view common among Creationists?
- 📝 What general theological framework(s) are represented in the Life Application Study Bible commentary?
- 📝 Are there any denominations that teach their members how to hear God's voice better, as exemplified by the Apostles in Scripture?
- 📝 What is the meaning of the statement in Genesis 4:26 stating then began men to call upon the name of YHWH?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis against inter-faith marriages?
- 📝 How do Biblical Unitarians understand "the glory of the Father's own self" that Jesus claims he had before the world was?
- 📝 Why do we use the name "Jesus" if the apostles did not use it?
- 📝 Why is 'putting to death' condoned in the Bible?
- 📝 What should a priest who commits a mortal sin just before Holy Mass do, if confession is not available?
- 📝 Why does Iglesia ni Cristo use the Lamsa Bible?
- 📝 Is there a systematic theology resource based solely on the words of Jesus?
- 📝 Were priests just dressed in secular garb in the early church?
- 📝 What did the Gnostics in first and second century believed about Jesus
- 📝 Is there any biblical support for the world ending in 2029?
- 📝 What does 'ages of ages' mean, specifically?
- 📝 What is the significance of the 5 "faithful sayings" of Paul?
- 📝 Does the Minimal Facts Argument have the potential to the biggest Christian revelation over the last thousand years?
- 📝 How central is the claim the pope is the antichrist to Protestant theology?
- 📝 Master of Ceremonies wears purple at High Masses according to the Extraordinary Form of the Mass?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 What does it mean that "many parts which are plain have been taken away"?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus, Father, and Holy Spirit are of the same nature but different personas?
- 📝 What does it mean that John's Gospel does not have an account of the institution of the Eucharist?
- 📝 In the tradition of Jehovah's Witnesses, does Romans 6:23 mean that all people who are resurrected have their sins blotted out?
- 📝 What attributes does Jesus have from an LDS doctrinal perspective that are different from the Jesus in the Holy Trinity?
- 📝 What does the Nicene Creed mean when it says that the Father and the Son are of the same substance?
- 📝 What does it mean for Christ to have been slain before the creation of the world?
- 📝 What does Paul mean when he says that we are no longer under the law but under grace?
- 📝 To the Calvinist, does Phillipians 1:29 mean that all the Philippians will go to heaven because all of them have already been elected?
- 📝 What does it mean that Satan is "god of this world"?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus fulfilled the law but did not abolish it?
- 📝 What exactly does it mean that Jesus Christ is the son of God?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus was the "second Adam"?
- 📝 Does Catholic doctrine teach that the Incarnation would have taken place regardless of Adam's decision?
- 📝 What does it mean that someone managed to live beyond 120 years?
- 📝 What is the basis for arguing that Paul should have been selected as the 12th apostle instead of Matthias?
- 📝 What does it mean that all scripture is God-Breathed?
- 📝 What does it mean that "the two natures of Christ cannot be separated"?
- 📝 Are there any credible arguments that Jesus may have been gay or tending h*m*sexual?
- 📝 What does it mean that baptism "erases original sin"?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church have a contingency plan for the case that the pope and all cardinals are dead?
- 📝 Are there or have there been Christian healing ministries that have documented healing cases with supporting medical records?
- 📝 According to Catholic doctrine, what effect does the Last Judgment have on those who are already in heaven?
- 📝 What does the Bible say about this question- Why do Jesus and God have two seats in heaven when they are the same God?
- 📝 What does Mormonism have to offer in regards to salvation through Jesus Christ that was not already taught in the New Testament?
- 📝 How do errantists distinguish the parts of the Bible that are trustworthy from the parts that have errors?
- 📝 What does Jesus mean when He says that we should be like children?
- 📝 According to Jehovah’s Witnesses what does the name Immanuel mean in light of their belief that Jesus is a created being and not God?
- 📝 What Tradition is Paul referring to when he admonishes us to "hold the traditions which ye have been taught"?
- 📝 Which are the parts of the Old Testament that point to Jesus?