Metta towards a non-sentient entity or substance (e.g. rice)?
Upvote:1
Is there a Buddhist tradition or practice, which involves developing or showing metta towards a non-sentient entity ... for example, towards a jar of rice?
Not that I know of.
If not, why not?
This essay says,
These four attitudes are said to be excellent or sublime because they are the right or ideal way of conduct towards living beings (sattesu samma patipatti). They provide, in fact, the answer to all situations arising from social contact.
Rice isn't a "living being", and one does not have "social contact" with rice.
Also I don't think that rice is capable of "suffering" (because it isn't sentient; it's inanimate), and so it's not a suitable object for "metta".
Is it theoretically possible (according to Buddhist theory) that such a practice might have an effect, an effect not only on the mind of the practitioner but also on the object
I don't think so. I think you're asking that the rice last longer before spoiling, that it be less impermanent; and I don't remember seeing doctrine which I could construe as saying that "wishing that something were less impermanent is enough make it so".
Conversely there's doctrine about doing rather than wishing: saying e.g. if you want a long life then you should do things which are conducive to long life (not just wish for it).
Perhaps being careful about preparing the rice you care for, and doing something such as cleaning the jar more carefully or sealing the jar more tightly, might show an experimental effect.
Upvote:1
Metta is practitioner's consciousness that thinking to make happy consciousness arise in the other lives. (sukhī attānaṃ pariharantu)
Rice never have happy consciousness arising.
Masuro Emoto's rice experiment was just utuniyāma. That experiment was just regular of nature. It doesn't mean rice has consciousness arising.
Upvote:1
Metta is practiced in order to overcome the feeling of negativity and alienation towards the world in the practitioner's mind. The grudge towards the world is replaced with compassion for the people. If this negativity is not removed it remains a drain of emotional energy and precludes attainment of Jhanas.
Since no-one normally has grudge against rice or apple, Metta towards it is a nonsensical concept.
More post
- 📝 How to find the right Dhamma teacher
- 📝 What is a person (puggala)?
- 📝 Answering Zizek's challenge to Buddhism
- 📝 Is All-Is-One a buddhist belief?
- 📝 Is the Pali Canon the final authority in the Theravada tradition?
- 📝 Can a person reach enlightment living an average life, married with children?
- 📝 Someone making sacrifices outside the Sangha of Savakas, can such be expected as follower?
- 📝 Question about metta
- 📝 How is a Theravada Buddhist monastery established?
- 📝 Seeing things for what they are
- 📝 Psychic Powers and the Kevatta Sutta (DN 11)
- 📝 Previous gurus or teachers of the Buddha
- 📝 What is the meaning of delusion? and how to get rid of it?
- 📝 Alternative to Willpower in Fighting Cravings
- 📝 Is "nāma" an equivalent of the Western concept of "mind"? Is it used alone?
- 📝 How to chant the mantra Nam Myoho Renge Kyo?
- 📝 In which context did the Buddha say this, about ordaining women?
- 📝 Tradition and purpose of prostration practice
- 📝 How does teaching of Buddhism deal with waste? How does teaching of Buddhism deal with acceptance even it causes unhappiness?
- 📝 Can a human being reside both in this world and Nirvana at the same time?
- 📝 What is Buddhist Modernism?
- 📝 Vajra Posture vs Lotus Posture -- the same or male vs female?
- 📝 How do you know which mantra suits you the most?
- 📝 Can I practice Buddhism without meditating?
- 📝 Managing sloth and torpor in meditation?
- 📝 Can a arahant recognize the spiritual attainment of others?
- 📝 In Yogacara Buddhism, is discontinuity an illusion, and does change arise?
- 📝 Is there a historical connection between Buddhism and martial arts?
- 📝 Can a puthujjana have unshakable faith in the Buddha-Dhamma?
- 📝 Does yesterday have buddha nature
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Metta towards a non-sentient entity or substance (e.g. rice)?
- 📝 Is there a middle way between working towards personal liberation and liberation for all sentient beings?
- 📝 metta towards women
- 📝 Metta towards yourself - useless?
- 📝 Is Buddhism "opposed" to striving, or working towards a goal that you really want
- 📝 Does being in a commited married life make it impossible to attain Nirvana? If not, how can one progress towards Nirvana?
- 📝 Do metta practices and anatta contradict each other?
- 📝 Metta for dead father
- 📝 As a Buddhist how do I get over hatred towards my previous religion?
- 📝 Do monks not have responsibility towards parents and family?
- 📝 How to keep balance in the thin line between non attachment to reputation and "not caring about anything"
- 📝 Plants may be sentient beings like animals so how do you decide what to eat?
- 📝 Can Buddhist marry non Buddhist?
- 📝 Why is Metta Practice so Hard?
- 📝 New to metta meditation
- 📝 Is curiosity, for non Dhamma subjects, a bad thing?
- 📝 Can Metta make you likable?
- 📝 How to view people with metta and karuna?
- 📝 If a substance enhanced the ability to stay mindful, and didnt cause intoxication or carelessness, would it still violate the fifth precept?
- 📝 How we can develop metta for terrorists?
- 📝 How to practice Metta without a Benefactor?
- 📝 Two Extremes of Metta
- 📝 If there be no soul or transmigrating entity that takes rebirth, who or what bears or enjoys the consequences or fruits of karma?
- 📝 How does metta sutra develop loving kindness
- 📝 Why do enlightened beings want to save sentient beings? Does everyone want to be saved?
- 📝 How does our inactions contribute to Karma?... For eg:How can you justify act of your cook killing an animal for your non buddhist guest?
- 📝 I have some metta problem
- 📝 "I fear the man of one book" - What is your attitude towards this thought?
- 📝 Non duality - does it quash ambition?
- 📝 How to practise without having aversion towards life?