Metta towards a non-sentient entity or substance (e.g. rice)?
Upvote:1
Is there a Buddhist tradition or practice, which involves developing or showing metta towards a non-sentient entity ... for example, towards a jar of rice?
Not that I know of.
If not, why not?
This essay says,
These four attitudes are said to be excellent or sublime because they are the right or ideal way of conduct towards living beings (sattesu samma patipatti). They provide, in fact, the answer to all situations arising from social contact.
Rice isn't a "living being", and one does not have "social contact" with rice.
Also I don't think that rice is capable of "suffering" (because it isn't sentient; it's inanimate), and so it's not a suitable object for "metta".
Is it theoretically possible (according to Buddhist theory) that such a practice might have an effect, an effect not only on the mind of the practitioner but also on the object
I don't think so. I think you're asking that the rice last longer before spoiling, that it be less impermanent; and I don't remember seeing doctrine which I could construe as saying that "wishing that something were less impermanent is enough make it so".
Conversely there's doctrine about doing rather than wishing: saying e.g. if you want a long life then you should do things which are conducive to long life (not just wish for it).
Perhaps being careful about preparing the rice you care for, and doing something such as cleaning the jar more carefully or sealing the jar more tightly, might show an experimental effect.
Upvote:1
Metta is practitioner's consciousness that thinking to make happy consciousness arise in the other lives. (sukhī attānaṃ pariharantu)
Rice never have happy consciousness arising.
Masuro Emoto's rice experiment was just utuniyāma. That experiment was just regular of nature. It doesn't mean rice has consciousness arising.
Upvote:1
Metta is practiced in order to overcome the feeling of negativity and alienation towards the world in the practitioner's mind. The grudge towards the world is replaced with compassion for the people. If this negativity is not removed it remains a drain of emotional energy and precludes attainment of Jhanas.
Since no-one normally has grudge against rice or apple, Metta towards it is a nonsensical concept.
More post
- 📝 Is there a distinction between "ego identity" and "craving/hating"?
- 📝 Mindfulness in Everyday Activity
- 📝 Temporary Influences on Meditation
- 📝 Is the path considered or viewed as being selfish?
- 📝 There is no benefit and there is no intrinsic positive nature in a pleasant sensation
- 📝 What is a phenomenological perspective?
- 📝 Freely available translations of the Dhammapada
- 📝 Chinese Buddhists consider all people to be potential Buddhas
- 📝 Qualitative Benefit of Longer Sits
- 📝 Can you explain the "Maha Meru"?
- 📝 Can One Evaluate the Effects of Meditation?
- 📝 How does stream entry occur?
- 📝 Were the Zen Patriarchs reborn?
- 📝 Can / how do we know what death is?
- 📝 Quantified Self and Meditation
- 📝 Looking for a quote by the Buddha
- 📝 Is ignorance a kammically active volitional formation, or a kammically passive fruit of past kamma?
- 📝 Where are the main collections of digitized Buddhist art online?
- 📝 How important is the surangama sutra in cotemporary buddhism?
- 📝 What is the exact Age Limit that Buddha can live?
- 📝 Can you criticise or improve Ven. Bodhi's description of Mahayana
- 📝 How to rebuild a relationship after a breach of trust?
- 📝 Does the degree of the victim's sentience correlate with the kamma associated with killing it?
- 📝 Where can I find suttas about the immaterial realm?
- 📝 Buddha's self-declaration without identity view and without conceit
- 📝 Is Mahayana Buddhism a form of idealism?
- 📝 Is there any meditation technique to be aware of what you hear?
- 📝 Is all property communal for the monks?
- 📝 How many countries did Lord Buddha travel?
- 📝 Importance of Tipitaka in Mahayana Schools
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Metta towards a non-sentient entity or substance (e.g. rice)?
- 📝 Is there a middle way between working towards personal liberation and liberation for all sentient beings?
- 📝 metta towards women
- 📝 Metta towards yourself - useless?
- 📝 Is Buddhism "opposed" to striving, or working towards a goal that you really want
- 📝 Does being in a commited married life make it impossible to attain Nirvana? If not, how can one progress towards Nirvana?
- 📝 Do metta practices and anatta contradict each other?
- 📝 Metta for dead father
- 📝 As a Buddhist how do I get over hatred towards my previous religion?
- 📝 Do monks not have responsibility towards parents and family?
- 📝 How to keep balance in the thin line between non attachment to reputation and "not caring about anything"
- 📝 Plants may be sentient beings like animals so how do you decide what to eat?
- 📝 Can Buddhist marry non Buddhist?
- 📝 Why is Metta Practice so Hard?
- 📝 New to metta meditation
- 📝 Is curiosity, for non Dhamma subjects, a bad thing?
- 📝 Can Metta make you likable?
- 📝 How to view people with metta and karuna?
- 📝 If a substance enhanced the ability to stay mindful, and didnt cause intoxication or carelessness, would it still violate the fifth precept?
- 📝 How we can develop metta for terrorists?
- 📝 How to practice Metta without a Benefactor?
- 📝 Two Extremes of Metta
- 📝 If there be no soul or transmigrating entity that takes rebirth, who or what bears or enjoys the consequences or fruits of karma?
- 📝 How does metta sutra develop loving kindness
- 📝 Why do enlightened beings want to save sentient beings? Does everyone want to be saved?
- 📝 How does our inactions contribute to Karma?... For eg:How can you justify act of your cook killing an animal for your non buddhist guest?
- 📝 I have some metta problem
- 📝 "I fear the man of one book" - What is your attitude towards this thought?
- 📝 Non duality - does it quash ambition?
- 📝 How to practise without having aversion towards life?