Why does Buddhism seem to have more than one goal?
score:5
Traditional Mahayana answer is: because of different "capacities". People of "lower capacity" only care about fulfilling basic desires, perhaps just the animal instincts, - then going up the ladder we get those that want material happiness in this world (e.g. comfortable family life), then those who aspire to greater immaterial (but still this-worldly) achievements and realizations, and then those who aspire to rebirth in a better world.
Then we get to the next level, that of spiritual practitioners, who aspire to find the truth, become saints, attain supernatural abilities etc. like e.g. immortality, then those who strive for Enlightenment/Nirvana (this is considered the middling capacity) - and then, according to Mahayana, the higher capacity, which entails desire to attain Enlightenment in order to help all the rest of sentient beings. Finally, in Vajrayana, we get to people of "highest capacity" who directly see Great Perfection of Everything As Is and do not have any goals or desires.
This is the traditional answer (retold in casual simplification). Now if you ask my personal opinion, I would beg you to notice that all these goals are not really in logical opposition with each other. If you think about it, all goals represent various visions of Happiness, or "The Way Things Should Be" - as it appears to each respective type of person. It's not that the lower levels are wrong about their idea of happiness, it's just that they don't quite realize how much hidden suffering is inherent to success on each of the levels.
So really what Buddhism is after, is realization of one's highest aspirations. And on every level of this pyramid Buddha-Dharma provides very rational, methodical, consistent framework for achieving success. What makes Buddhism cool though, is that the practices for achieving success on every level are not just in no conflict with other levels but actually help the levels above and below it.
For example, if one practices emotional intelligence, one will not only have greater control over events of one's life, but also become able to help others still overwhelmed by stress, and also get a step closer to Enlightenment through understanding the nature of mind-made phenomena.
So, to summarize, it seems like Buddhism has multiple goals - but that's just the way it looks from the perspective of different individuals. In reality there is One Goal ("peace"/"happiness"), and Buddhism is the rational method for achieving it.
Upvote:0
Nirvana is the ending of rebirth therefore the two goals are completely antagonist. Rebirth is for what Buddhism calls 'ordinary people' ('puthujjana'). All beings are born into the world with reproductive instincts & only a few freaks are able to attain Nirvana. Nirvana is for people who are genuinely disenchanted with the world & sex. For the puthajjana, Buddhism teaches kamma & rebirth so the puthajjana don't engage in self-harm due to their ignorance.
Only a few, like birds escaping from the net, go to realms of bliss. Dhp 174
Upvote:0
Buddhism wouldn't ascribe such categorical meanings to things. With anatta you can't rationally split 'life' and 'non-life' in some completely defined way. The meaning of the universe is to not contradict, dependent origination and emptiness do not contradict.
Upvote:0
This answer base on the most ancient theravāda view from the most ancient tipitaka-pāli, that nibbāna is only the best goal, and every rebirth is bad, also every teaching for rebirth is not the best, too.
According to ChrisW answer in this topic:
Life is clinging-aggregates' rebirth. Aggregates' rebirth are paṭiccasamuppāda.
"Now what is the noble truth of stress? Birth is stressful, aging is stressful, death is stressful; sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair are stressful; association with the unbeloved is stressful; separation from the loved is stressful; not getting what one wants is stressful. In short, the five clinging-aggregates are stressful.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.22.0.than.html
"And what is dependent co-arising? From ignorance as a requisite condition come fabrications. From fabrications as a requisite condition comes consciousness. From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-&-form. From name-&-form as a requisite condition come the six sense media. From the six sense media as a requisite condition comes contact. From contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. From feeling as a requisite condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging/sustenance. From clinging/sustenance as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair come into play. Such is the origination of this entire mass of stress & suffering.
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.002.than.html
sāsavā puññabhāgiyā upadhivepakkā
effluents, be merit, giving resultant.
- [saṅkhāra, kamma-bhava] right view that kilesa-vaṭṭa-paṭiccasamuppāda depending on [kāma-āsava (kāma-upādāna), diṭṭhi-āsava (diṭṭhi-upādāna, sīlabata-upādāna), bhava-āsava (attavāda-upādāna), avijjā-āsava],
- right view that is kammavaṭṭa-paṭiccasamuppāda,
- right view that give vipākavaṭṭa-paṭiccasamuppāda.
So, clinging-aggregates' rebirth are paṭiccasamuppāda. And paṭiccasamuppāda are effluents, be merit, giving resultant.
Why better clinging-life is a bad goal?
The reasons is answered in S.N. Nidānavagga, which teaching just paṭiccasamuppāda-sutta in various ways. For the example:
Staying at Savatthi. Then the Blessed One, picking up a little bit of dust with the tip of his fingernail, said to the monks, "What do you think, monks? Which is greater: the little bit of dust I have picked up with the tip of my fingernail, or the great earth?"
"The great earth is far greater, lord. The little bit of dust the Blessed One has picked up with the tip of his fingernail is next to nothing. It doesn't even count. It's no comparison. It's not even a fraction, this little bit of dust the Blessed One has picked up with the tip of his fingernail, when compared with the great earth.
"In the same way, monks, few are the beings reborn among human beings. Far more are those reborn elsewhere. Thus you should train yourselves: 'We will live heedfully.' That's how you should train yourselves."
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ati/tipitaka/sn/sn20/sn20.002.than.html
Upvote:0
The Buddha's teachings, when properly practiced, all take the practitioner in the direction of Nirvana. The Buddha gave each person the best possible teaching to aim them towards Nirvana based on their previous karma so it wasn't always possible for every individual to make it to total liberation without going through further rebirths.
I don't know if the Buddha ever taught a bodhisattva but that wouldn't make the bodhisattva goal invalid because obviously that was the Buddha's goal.
Upvote:1
I think there are traditionally two. In one of the suttas (MN 117), the Buddha said,
"And what is right view? Right view, I tell you, is of two sorts: There is right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions [of becoming]; there is right view that is noble, without effluents, transcendent, a factor of the path.
"And what is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions? 'There is what is given, what is offered, what is sacrificed. There are fruits & results of good & bad actions. There is this world & the next world. There is mother & father. There are spontaneously reborn beings; there are contemplatives & brahmans who, faring rightly & practicing rightly, proclaim this world & the next after having directly known & realized it for themselves.' This is the right view with effluents, siding with merit, resulting in acquisitions.
"And what is the right view that is noble, without effluents, transcendent, a factor of the path? The discernment, the faculty of discernment, the strength of discernment, analysis of qualities as a factor for awakening, the path factor of right view[1] in one developing the noble path whose mind is noble, whose mind is without effluents, who is fully possessed of the noble path. This is the right view that is noble, without effluents, transcendent, a factor of the path.
If I can summarise I think that the first type of right view is that there are good and bad actions which result in further becoming and acquisitions; contrasted with the second type of right view.
Each of these words (effluent, merit, and so on) can be (has been) a topic of its own.
The simplest (shortest) summary of what the Buddha taught is maybe "Both formerly & now, it is only stress that I describe, and the cessation of stress." The next step up from that in complexity (or rather, the same doctrine but in more detail -- also the first sutta that he spoke) is the doctrine[s] of the Middle Way and Four Noble Truths.
However various schools may have different views: about what nirvana is, about continuing existence in samsara, about the role of the Buddha (as saviour) versus one's own responsibility.
Incidentally I think that another Buddhist doctrine is that people are confused about what they want, what they ought to want, whether what they want is satisfying and/or right, and so on. I think this (confusion) is part of what's meant by "ignorance" as one of the fundamental drivers of the wheel of life. I mention that because your question ("What do Buddhists want?") might include an assumption ("Buddhists are wise and want the right thing. I too should want what Buddhists want.").
More post
- 📝 Understanding compassion fatigue from a buddhist point of view
- 📝 Why does the Buddha blame Ananda asking him to remain living forever?
- 📝 Is there any mention of child adoption in any Buddhist writings and what is the view on child adoption with regard to Buddhism?
- 📝 Did Siddhartha Gautam become Buddha using Vipassana alone?
- 📝 How do I practise Vipassana and Samatha through Anapanasati?
- 📝 Is mindfulness itself kamma ? does it create kamma?
- 📝 Vajrayana Buddhism: Teachings the Buddha reserved for "only some individuals"?
- 📝 How is Nirvana illustrated
- 📝 Why does/would a "Bodhisattva" burdens himself and instigate others as well?
- 📝 Purifying Karma using mantras and/or prostrations
- 📝 Does anyone read the part 2 of Nagarjuna's karika as an argument about infinite divisibility?
- 📝 What is the meaning of the lotus?
- 📝 Someone making sacrifices outside the Sangha of Savakas, can such be expected as follower?
- 📝 Why does Snp 2.2 not consider eating meat to be killing karma?
- 📝 Why is the Heart Sutra so important in Mahayana Buddhism?
- 📝 What do Buddhists religious texts say about the environment?
- 📝 Understanding Mindfulness through outwardly qualities
- 📝 Can an Icchantika make any form of progress along the Buddhist path?
- 📝 Is there person without consciousness?
- 📝 Is thinking just measuring and comparing?
- 📝 Should one give to beggars?
- 📝 Which meditation is less likely to have negative effects or be practiced wrong?
- 📝 Does the Pali word "sattā" mean "sentient beings"?
- 📝 Why Mind is Fickle?
- 📝 Why not force awareness of things during vipassana?
- 📝 What is the Buddhist Perspective on Lucid Dreaming?
- 📝 Sutta Reference - Sound and musical instruments metaphors in the Suttas
- 📝 Time in Buddhism
- 📝 Looking for a Buddhist Monastery in UK, Ireland, Scotland or Australia - All traditions are welcome
- 📝 Why is 'attention' ('manasikara') included within 'nama-rupa'?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why does Buddhism seem to have more than one goal?
- 📝 Why is Zen/Chan thought to be more related to Buddhism than to Taoism?
- 📝 Does Pure Land Buddhism ever have a Buddha other than Amitābha as the object of devotion?
- 📝 Why does Buddhism use the word "realm" when describing one of the different races?
- 📝 Does Zen Buddhism have canonical texts?
- 📝 Does Buddhism have a concept of avatars?
- 📝 I explain why I prefer discuss Buddhism intellectually but others don't seem to accept my point. Why is that?
- 📝 How does one practice Buddhism when experience is limited by the 6 senses?
- 📝 Why does Mara, the Evil One one comes looking for consciousness at death?
- 📝 Does Buddhism have a significant notion of justice
- 📝 Does Buddhism have a concept of blasphemy?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have more advice for the lay follower than is typically supposed?
- 📝 What does Diamond Way Buddhism say about obstacles at times of becoming more conscious?
- 📝 What does "Namaste" mean in Buddhism context and why is it even associated with Buddhism?
- 📝 Why is Buddhism less evangelical than Christianity?
- 📝 Why is focusing on the breath more difficult than focusing on Mantras, and how important is it before vipassana?
- 📝 Why does Mahasi Method have the points on the Body to attend to?
- 📝 If someone have experienced supernatural abilities through meditation, than why don't he shows it to world?
- 📝 Why does one suffer because of ignorance if ignorance is unintentional?
- 📝 Where does one get basic notions of Buddhism when starting with Mahayana?
- 📝 Why sukha (third Jhana) is more refine than pīti (second Jhana)?
- 📝 Does Buddhism have an answer to disturbing sexual fantasies?
- 📝 Does any other sect of Buddhism have the stages of insight?
- 📝 Cessation of suffering is the main goal of Buddhism, but is cessation of suffering the end goal or does Buddhism pursue Joy beyond end of suffering?
- 📝 Why does it hard to ask other Buddhists to do analysis, rather than advising me to stop analyzing?
- 📝 Does Buddhism have a view on the "gut feeling?"
- 📝 If you cannot can save others then why is your practice more worthy than anything else?
- 📝 Does Buddhism have a notion of providence leading unbelievers?
- 📝 Does the material, make, physical properties of a Mala/Rosary matter? Is there more to it than just a counting device?
- 📝 Why is Buddhism not Nihilism?