score:5
The way my teacher explained it to me, we can either be masters of our mind, masters or information (=wise attention), or our mind can be our master, information can be our master (=unwise attention).
In the second case, we let our minds push us around. We allow information to make us think about things whether it's good for us or not. Things that are negative, or things that are useless to think about, things that make us feel bad. Our mind tells us: "see this? Because this is so and so, you have lost, there's no hope", etc. We let our negative inertia maintain ourselves in maimed and injured condition. Or, "see this? you must want this." - as is the case of lust or envy. We eat all kinds of informational junkfood without being selective. Or we let our rational mind, our logical mind, take us down the path of conceptual proliferation and fruitless quasi-intellectual speculation. We get fooled by information into believing that we must come to certain conclusions, that we don't have a choice.
Yoniso manasikāra is Emotional Intelligence. We decide what to think and how to think it - in order to feel stronger, healthier, and motivated. We actively decide what not to pay attention to, so negative mindstates cannot enter our minds. We don't let "Mara", devas, spirits, memes, advertis*m*nt, etc. and other informational viruses, to enter our informational space uncontrollably and do whatever they want to us. We are actively responsible for our mental hygiene.
We know the noble truths, so we know how attachment to expectation mismatch causes dukkha and makes us weak, and how being blameless and having no inner conflict makes us happy and strong, so we actively exploit this mechanism.
Moreover, we decide how to frame our thinking, what context and coordinates to choose. Because reality is an interpretation we make, choosing a mental framework is choosing a reality. We choose reality in which we are happy and can make others happy. We don't choose reality in which we are miserable and make others miserable.
Upvote:1
Proper (Sujato)/careful (Bodhi) attention starves the five hindrances and feeds the seven factors of awakening. Conversely, improper (Sujato)/careless (Bodhi) attention feeds the hindrances and starves the awakening factors. Ajahn Brahm often translates yoniso manasikāra as "the work of the mind that goes back to the source".
SN46.51 gives examples of how to apply yoniso manasikāra within the framework of the four right efforts.
Upvote:2
In my understanding yoniso manasikara is attention at the origin, the source.
For example the Buddha used yoniso manasikara when he contemplated "what is the cause of death" - "birth is the cause of death"
In daily life we would look at anger, in a ayoniso way, getting caught up in it. But if we would look at in in yoniso way, we would check how it arises, why, where, and what is angry, what is hurt.
Upvote:4
I think Ayoniso-manasikara Sutta clearly show what inappropriate and approprate attention means.
Quoted below is the Sutta ("Ayoniso-manasikara Sutta: Inappropriate Attention" (SN 9.11), translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (BCBS Edition), 30 November 2013):
I have heard that on one occasion a certain monk was dwelling among the Kosalans in a forest thicket. Now at that time, he spent the day's abiding thinking evil, unskillful thoughts: i.e., thoughts of sensuality, thoughts of ill will, thoughts of doing harm.
Then the devata inhabiting the forest thicket, feeling sympathy for the monk, desiring his benefit, desiring to bring him to his senses, approached him and addressed him with this verse:
From inappropriate attention
you're being chewed by your thoughts.
Relinquishing what's inappropriate,
contemplate
appropriately.Keeping your mind on the Teacher,
the Dhamma, the Sangha, your virtues,
you will arrive at
joy,
rapture,
pleasure
without doubt.Then, saturated with joy,
you will put an end
to suffering & stress.The monk, chastened by the devata, came to his senses.
A good response for your question can also be found: