score:0
You needs to understand below before reading the main answer at the bottom.
Samatha is understanding of easy escape, using illusion to avoid 5 string. This is in KāyagatāsatiSutta.
Vipassana is understanding of hardest full escape, using reality to perfect finish 5 clinging-aggregates. This is in DN 22 MahāsatipaṭṭhānaSutta.
Samatha has higher deep analysis than normal secular, but lower than Vipassana.
You can just clinging on breathe feeling to be happy, but you need to analysis mind's quality and develop it to get the breathe illusion (Paṭibhāga-nimitta) and attain the first Jhāna's happiness.
But it is not enough to attain powerful state of Vipassanā and get Nibbāna. Vipassanā is going meditate after the practitioner's mind is at high quality, CittaVisuddhi. At this state, the practitioner can analysis everything from the lower hell to the top heaven into tiniest elements.
Every clinging-aggregate has tiniest moment which arise and vanish immediately more than a trillion time in a second. Each moment has many elements which originating it.
The practitioner must analysis everything as uncountable tiniest origins and effects like that every life's moment and analysis all relations of them as they really are when arising. This is called PaṭiccaSamuppāda. The practitioner is thinking like a genius psychologist, chemist, biologist, physicist, thinking together in the same head.
This deepest analysis turn the practitioner's objects into 3 characteristic illusions. 3 characteristics are illustrated from the complex knowledge of the real relationship of every tiniest moment of life.
The reality must be possible to arise and must have their real origins more than one, except Nibbāna which is the opposite reality of aggregates.
If the scientist put a little wrong chemistry in a test tube, the experiment must be fail at the end. If the practitioner analysis wrong elements' relations, 3 characteristic illusions are going to disappear in some hidden aggregates, then these some are permanent, pleasure, and controlable.
So, if the practitioner doesn't analysis, these still going on:
One meaning of "in" word in Pali is "each (Ekavacana-Niddhāraṇa)".
"There is the case where a monk remains focused on each body's elements in entire body — ardent, alert, & mindful — putting aside greed & distress with reference to the world. He remains focused on each feeling's elements in entire feelings... each mind's elements in entire mind... each element's elements in entire elements — ardent, alert, & mindful — putting aside greed & distress with reference to the world.
The "element" in this context means various term. All of term refer to "The dissection of the compact/illusion".
Then you should consider 21 pabba of DN22 like this, you will understand it easily.
Upvote:0
Theravadin Abhidhamma;
And how does a monk dwell contemplating (the nature of) the body in the body in regard to himself?
Here a monk in regard to himself—from the sole of the feet upwards, from the hair of the head down, bounded by the skin, and filled with manifold impurities—reflects (thus):
There are in this body:
hairs of the head, body hairs, nails, teeth, skin, flesh, sinews, bones, bone-marrow, kidneys, heart, liver, pleura, spleen, lungs, intestines, mesentery, undigested food, excrement, bile, phlegm, pus, blood, sweat, fat, tears, grease, spit, mucus, synovial fluid, urine. https://suttacentral.net/vb7/en/anandajoti
Upvote:0
Thank you very much 🙏🏼
खणः khanas are as illogical as स्वभाव svabhāva can be.
Abhiddhamma is not a metaphysical approach,
not everywhere, not in all Buddhist schools, not in each and every ancient वाद vāda :
The Middle Path is not anti-metaphysical yet.
Because Vipassana is a Practice that precedes any theories.
Thanks again 🙏🏼