Can the "Senika heresy" be useful?
score:0
The idea that the Buddha is "unaffected by the vicissitudes of bodily existence" [Mystical Realist, Kim] seems to be the root mistake that Dogen is proselytizing against.
What may be key to interpreting it is that all post Madhyamaka Buddhists taught that form, which is what the body is, is mind. Dogen then could be emphasizing that rebirth, in this life and the next, and Buddhahood, makes for some new body by mental causation. Not, then, than mind perishes completely with this body.
I've done very little koan or Rinzai study, but would guess that our original enlightenment, as the body of the Buddha, is emphasized therein: because Soto, compared to "the true man without affairs", is less concerned with 'words' and 'discriminative thought', 'causation'.
Upvote:1
What Dōgen calls sennigedo is a view found in several schools of Buddhism, for example in the teachings of Tendai contemporary with Dōgen in Japan. But this is not what Matsuo Basho was expressing in "Mind itself is Buddha", the poem Dōgen used to argue the criticism you expressed in your quote. He quotes this poem in the story of Damei Fachang (Daibai Hojo) in both his Shobogenzo and Eiheikoroku. What he actually argues is:
“The mind that has been authentically transmitted is ‘one mind is all dharmas; all dharmas are one mind.’….. We clearly understand that the mind refers to the mountains, rivers, and the great earth; the sun, the moon and the stars. …. Therefore, ‘mind itself is buddha’ refers to all the buddhas who carry out arousing bodhi-mind, practice, awakening, and nirvana. Those who have not yet been carrying out arousing bodhi-mind, practice, awakening and nirvana are not ‘mind itself is buddha.'”
Stated differently, Dōgen argues that until you realize (in both senses of the English word simultaneously, not just intellectually) that "Mind is Buddha", you risk to conceptualize Buddha-nature as eternal & transcendent of causation and death. He is therefore not criticizing Basho, but the concept underlying the interpretation that all factors of experience (hō in Japanese, Dharmas in Sanskrit) are somehow not subject to causation (which implies they are timeless).
The best elaboration on this argument I know is in Heine's Existential and Ontological Dimensions of Time in Heidegger and Dogen Chapter "The Question of Time"
More post
- 📝 How can there be knowledge of unconditioned phenomenon without any knower?
- 📝 Is it dangerous to focus on ticks from childhood during meditation?
- 📝 Avoiding Triggers that can generate negative karma
- 📝 What are the similarities between quantum physics and buddism?
- 📝 What is the difference between fear and anxiety?
- 📝 How can Buddhism help me to get rid of a suffering due to a disease?
- 📝 Is there a moral aspect to financial debt in Buddhism?
- 📝 Does buying meat equate to approving of killing an animal?
- 📝 Where does one get basic notions of Buddhism when starting with Mahayana?
- 📝 A question about DN 23 and existence of soul
- 📝 What Buddhist babies' names or meaning should be?
- 📝 Masturbation: Does it break the 3rd precept?
- 📝 if the self is an illusion - all my relationships are illusion too?
- 📝 Any advice on leg numbing during sitting?
- 📝 Is the true self reborn?
- 📝 Where to go after Meditation apps
- 📝 How to get away from the desire to become a Buddhist Teacher or some influencer followed by many?
- 📝 Should I do reflection before eating if I don't plan to keep it
- 📝 Is understanding a "bring-debt" or "gain-debt"?
- 📝 Looking for examples of "Bad" Men and Women who became Enlightened
- 📝 What is the difference between access and absorption in Vipassana meditation?
- 📝 Transfering merits to parents after their death
- 📝 Going to extremes?
- 📝 Breathing Meditation and Repression
- 📝 Is insisting on calling “consciousness” a real thing appropriate?
- 📝 When did the Buddha get surrounded by lots of animals?
- 📝 Did Gudo Wafu Nishijima claim that there will be no pain for anyone after death?
- 📝 A limit of right speech
- 📝 Did the Buddha approved the idea of a council or was it a decision made after he passed away?
- 📝 Focus on the object or nimitta?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Can the Buddha ever be a woman?
- 📝 Where is the Buddha quoted as saying do not believe anything I say until you can prove it by yourself?
- 📝 How can I assess the quality of a local Buddhist group?
- 📝 Can one practice meditation to gain knowledge about the universe?
- 📝 Can the noble eightfold path be followed in its entirety by a lay follower?
- 📝 Enlightened Lies - Can lying be the correct action in certain situations?
- 📝 Can environmental degradation be used as a justification for the culling of an invasive alien species?
- 📝 What are the texts that contain words which can be attributed directly to the Buddha?
- 📝 Can Buddhism be viewed as a threat to the capitalist way of life?
- 📝 Can a person live by the Dhamma and have another religion as well?
- 📝 Which is the Buddhist holy book? Where can it be read?
- 📝 How can I build up to being able to get into the full lotus position?
- 📝 Can We Teach Animals the Dhamma?
- 📝 How can you see suffering in the breath?
- 📝 Can a arahant recognize the spiritual attainment of others?
- 📝 Can the Buddhism.SE site function as "the Sangha" for me?
- 📝 How can a lay person approach the learning process of Buddhism?
- 📝 Where can I find the Chinese Canon Agama in English translation?
- 📝 Can one alter the 6th precept to accommodate one's family or daily routines?
- 📝 Can lay people be involved in the weapons business?
- 📝 Can a lay person become an Arahant according to the Suttas?
- 📝 How can one define luxurious beds and seats in the eighth precept?
- 📝 What are the resources a Buddhist can use during very hard times?
- 📝 Is there anything one can do to save the deceased from the consequences of their Kamma?
- 📝 Can one follow Hinduism and Buddhism at the same time?
- 📝 Can Buddhists see into the future?
- 📝 Can I count my contribution to the open source as a dharma?
- 📝 Can bhavanga-consciousness be compared to the non-dual mind-state rigpa?
- 📝 Can a human being reside both in this world and Nirvana at the same time?
- 📝 How can the idea of reincarnation be true if all the information of who we are is already destroyed