Plato's Parmenides, Samsara and Nirvana
Upvote:3
The 'two truths' in Pali Buddhism are different to the 'two truths' in Mahayana Buddhism. Possibly, the 'two truths' of Mahayana Buddhism are more relevant to Plato's Parmenides.
In Pali Buddhism, the 'two truths' refers to the difference between how enlightened & unenlightened people interpret certain (mundane/moral) teachings of the Buddha, as follows:
The Awakened One, best of speakers, Spoke two kinds of truths: The conventional and the ultimate. A third truth does not obtain.
Therein: The speech wherewith the world converses is true, on account of its being agreed upon by the world. The speech which describes what is ultimate is also true, through characterizing dhammas as they really are.
Therefore, being skilled in common usage, false speech does not arise in the Teacher, who is Lord of the World, when he speaks according to conventions.
Commentary by Buddhaghosa
In Pali Buddhism, the translations "being" ('bhava') and "non-being" ('vibhava') refer to two kinds of dependently originated 'becoming' ('bhava') based on two kinds of dependently originated craving (as defined in the 2nd noble truth in SN 56.11), namely, 'bhavatanha' (craving to be) and 'vibhavatanha' (craving not to be). Both kinds of craving & becoming involve 'self-view'.
In other words, 'non-being' is not synonymous with the enlightened or unconditioned state of selflessness/emptiness (sunnata).
Some relevant texts that show how the translations 'being' & 'non-being' are used are below:
Idaṃ kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkhasamudayaṃ ariyasaccaṃ—yāyaṃ taṇhā ponobbhavikā nandirāgasahagatā tatratatrābhinandinī, seyyathidaṃ—kāmataṇhā, bhavataṇhā, vibhavataṇhā
Now this, bhikkhus, is the noble truth of the origin of suffering: it is this craving which leads to renewed existence/becoming (bhava), accompanied by delight and lust, seeking delight here and there; that is, craving for sensual pleasures, craving for existence, craving for extermination. SN 56.11
~~
So neva taṃ abhisaṅkharoti, na abhisañcetayati bhavāya vā vibhavāya vā. So anabhisaṅkharonto anabhisañcetayantoanabhisañcetayanto: ? bhavāya vā vibhavāya vā na kiñci loke upādiyati, anupādiyaṃ na paritassati, aparitassaṃ paccattaṃyeva parinibbāyati. ‘Khīṇā jāti, vusitaṃ brahmacariyaṃ, kataṃ karaṇīyaṃ, nāparaṃ itthattāyā’ti pajānāti.
He does not form any condition or generate any volition tending towards either being or non-being. Since he does not form any condition or generate any volition tending towards either being or non-being, he does not cling to anything in this world. When he does not cling, he is not agitated. When he is not agitated, he personally attains Nibbāna. He understands thus: ‘Birth is destroyed, the holy life has been lived, what had to be done has been done, there is no more coming to any state of being.’ MN 140
~~~
sato vā pana sattassa ucchedaṃ vināsaṃ vibhavaṃ paññapenti
Those who describe the...extermination of an existing being (satta)...Just as a dog, tied by a leash to a post or stake, keeps running around and circling around that very post or stake, through fear of identity and disgust with identity keep running & circling around that same identity... MN 102
'Samsara' is defined as the state of the mind circling & running around in ignorance & craving:
From an inconstruable beginning comes samsara. A beginning point is not evident, although beings hindered by ignorance and fettered by craving are running around & wandering on....Just as a dog, tied by a leash to a post or stake, keeps running around and circling around that very post or stake; in the same way, an uninstructed, run-of-the-mill person...keeps running around and circling around that very form... that very feeling... that very perception... those very fabrications... that very consciousness. He is not set loose from form, not set loose from feeling... from perception... from fabrications... not set loose from consciousness...
Therefore, dependently originated "being" and "non-being", namely, wanting to be this & not wanting to be that, are certainly characteristics of 'samsara' & probably reinforce each other.
However, whether they relate to Plato's Parmenides is another matter.
More post
- 📝 Why are Jhanas controversial?
- 📝 How to create awareness of the present moment
- 📝 Anapanasati - are the 16 considered progressive sequence of steps?
- 📝 Did the Buddha believe in rebirth and reincarnation?
- 📝 Does dukkha apply to name-and-form?
- 📝 Translation of Pali term "Arati"
- 📝 Is Mindfulness the Opposite of Multitasking?
- 📝 What meditation is best to learn to "control" your mind?
- 📝 Causes of Reincarnation
- 📝 Where did the Buddha speak of his difficulty in eating almsfood as a Bodhisatta?
- 📝 What Buddhist materials explain how to understand one's irrational feelings?
- 📝 Avoiding neck pain
- 📝 What is the significance of Commentaries (Atthakatha) to the Suttas?
- 📝 Appreciating Nature Aesthetically
- 📝 Need help with finding a specific Sutta
- 📝 Satipatthana bhavana versus Vipassana bhavana
- 📝 What is the difference between Shikantaza and Zazen?
- 📝 Purifying my mind
- 📝 Is there a commentary for the Dhammapada?
- 📝 Is a monk allowed to receive money?
- 📝 How does mindfulness practice (sati) lead to jhana?
- 📝 Does regret help us to correct our faults?
- 📝 What are the benefits of Dhamma in this very life that could be understood by a beginner?
- 📝 What does Buddhism say about events that cannot be explained through rational thought?
- 📝 Are there different types of craving?
- 📝 Is it allowed to quote a Buddhist teaching in a fiction book?
- 📝 What is the difference between a Bodhisatta and a Bodhisattva?
- 📝 How/Why to be moral without believing God or any supernatural entity?
- 📝 Does any sect claim that only Shakyamuni will ever achieve great nirvana
- 📝 What to do when overwhelmed with Doubt - Practical Advice
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Plato's Parmenides, Samsara and Nirvana
- 📝 Historically, where do the concepts of Karma, Nirvana, Dharma and Samsara come from?
- 📝 What is the relation between Nirvana and Parinirvana?
- 📝 Can a human being reside both in this world and Nirvana at the same time?
- 📝 Samsara and States of Being (reference request)
- 📝 Difference between abiding nirvana and non-abiding nirvana?
- 📝 Difference between Samsara and Dukkha
- 📝 What are the strengths and weaknesses of attempts to describe Nirvana in scripture?
- 📝 Is nirvana a mere conscious experience, and if so of what kind?
- 📝 Anybody know what is Nirvana and where we can find it?
- 📝 Nirvana and the six heavens in the 31 realms
- 📝 Does Nirvana really means stopping of birth and death? Does it ensures that no new one will arise again?
- 📝 Is Nirvana the goal, for Zen and Theravada?
- 📝 Is killing vermin and insects justifiable?
- 📝 What are the differences between vipassana and mindfulness meditation?
- 📝 Is Nirvana the goal for all Buddhist?
- 📝 Relationship with bad parents (kamma and issues)
- 📝 Are Vajrayana and Tibetan Buddhism the same thing?
- 📝 Comparison of Nirvana, Tao and Brahman/Atma
- 📝 How to deal with people and handle rude language?
- 📝 As a Buddhist with a Muslim family, community, and background... how do you integrate/cope?
- 📝 How concentrated is access concentration and how would one recognise it?
- 📝 How are 'conceit' and 'identity-view' not the same?
- 📝 Meditation and 'not trying to change anything'
- 📝 How do I slow down and start living according to my values? How do I change the direction of my life?
- 📝 Does studying mathematics or science lead to a practitioner of Buddhism acquiring wrong philosophical views and mental afflictions?
- 📝 How compatible are the beliefs of atheists and Buddhism?
- 📝 Strange feelings after meditation and mindfulness practice?
- 📝 What is the difference between craving and clinging?
- 📝 What are the differences/similarities in the concept of faith as used in Buddhism and Christianity?