Why ancient Prasangika buddhist Chandrakirti claimed "There is no chariot which depends on its parts"?
score:2
I wonder if this might be helpful...
Words superimpose a vaneer-like structure over our reality and this becomes the haze of naming and forming. It is a major component of ignorance and becomes the structure from which guides the superficiality of our existence. It can be very tricky to peer outside of this structure.
When we call the chariot a 'chariot', and believe that to be so, we have essentially bastardised a part of reality. We've segmented the chariot from its surroundings, merged all its parts into a single idea and given it the name chariot.
A chariot and its function is nothing without its surroundings. It can only be defined by the ground it moves along, the passengers it accepts, the horses that pull it, the space it moves through... - in other words, to truly define the chariot the entire universe would need to be taken into consideration and this is where name and form fall apart because naming and forming have strict parameters which are heavily challenged by the truth of reality. At a push one could say the chariot is everything such that it is incomprehensible. This makes the chariot empty and therefore nothing. The word 'chariot' is a convenient placeholder to help reference objects from one another. The problem occurs when one believes the chariot to be a chariot.
Now that we've neutralized the existence of chariot, it should be much easier to apply this to the chariot's components. Let's say you began removing those components one by one. At what point do you decide it is no longer a chariot?
“What do you think, Subhuti? Are there many particles of dust in this vast universe?”
Subhuti replied: “Yes, many, Most Honored One!”
“Subhuti, when the Buddha speaks of particles of dust, it does not mean I am thinking of any definite or arbitrary thought, I am merely using these words as a figure of speech. They are not real, only illusion. It is just the same with the word universe; these words do not assert any definite or arbitrary idea, I am only using the words as words.”
Upvote:0
The dependent origination is about phenomenon. One leads to other and not that one is made up of other. Example feelings lead to craving. Cessation of feeling is cessation of craving. Whereas while talking about chariot the simile applies to the idea of self. When you talk about chariot which part of chariot do you call chariot ? In modern terms we can apply it to a car. What is car ? Is it the doors ? Is it the tyres? Is it engine ? Is it the brakes ? Is the gear ? Is it the accelerator ? Question is how do you define car ? You will find you can’t ... what you have is a pointer to an undefinable idea. Similarly when you call Gautam what you have is a pointer to an undefinable idea ....
Upvote:2
This wiki page link is not a great translation and it is easy to be confused if you don't understand what is being negated/refuted by this line of reasoning: the inherent existence of a chariot. If you understand what is being negated, then the fourth point becomes: "There is no inherently existing chariot which depends on its parts" and the simile often given is of a lion in the forest.
More post
- 📝 Has any Buddhist ever talked about postponing Buddhahood forever, but not for all sentient beings?
- 📝 Is it possible to achieve universal detachment? How?
- 📝 Are the positive qualities of enlightenment ultimate or conventional realities?
- 📝 In how far does involvement in certain undertaking effects one, good or bad?
- 📝 Mindfulness improves academic performance?
- 📝 What does Buddhism say about intentionally killing dangerous insects and beings?
- 📝 looking for citation, pīti and sukha of 4 jhānas compared to dying of thirst, seeing water in distance, and drinking it
- 📝 Ordination and support from parents
- 📝 Is Nirvana the goal for all Buddhist?
- 📝 Found items and the Second Precept
- 📝 Why Buddha said "There is No God" and Later "There is God"?
- 📝 What dietary practices are most helpful for reaching enlightenment?
- 📝 What is/are the cause/s of becoming "perceiveless", an unconsciouse-being?
- 📝 Buddhist thought on Amends
- 📝 Is the seer and seen different? Example i saw tree . tree and "me" are different? Or tree and "me" are same?
- 📝 Punishments for breaking vinaya rules
- 📝 Authenticity of rules for monks and nuns
- 📝 Life Duration and Rebirth
- 📝 Does one need to make amends for a bad-action done accidentally?
- 📝 Anyone experiences with psychedelics and meditation?
- 📝 More self control - Beginners
- 📝 Not understanding Jhana Mastery Of Reflection?
- 📝 Can I cancel my consciousness?
- 📝 what is the nature of citta? nicca or anicca?
- 📝 Is anicca impermanence &/or uncertainty?
- 📝 Dhatu-vibhanga sutta question?
- 📝 Did Gautama Buddha really intend to create a new religion?
- 📝 Rationalism and The spirit of inquiry
- 📝 What is wrong speech according to Buddhism?
- 📝 What should I be mindful of in everyday mindfulness?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why ancient Prasangika buddhist Chandrakirti claimed "There is no chariot which depends on its parts"?
- 📝 Why isn't there a Buddhist Bible?
- 📝 Why are Buddhist concepts so difficult?
- 📝 Why is Buddha almost treated like a God in most Buddhist traditions?
- 📝 Attachment is a poison. Why is attachment to the Buddha and to Buddhist philosophy not a problem?
- 📝 Why do Buddhist Stupas have various shapes?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, despite that he claimed it himself?
- 📝 If a Buddhist believes lay life is not ideal for the practice, why does he or she continue?
- 📝 Why do monastics in certain Buddhist traditions take new names?
- 📝 What is the reason why Buddhist monks don't work to support themselves? Do the monastic rules prohibit them from working?
- 📝 The Buddha is said to have rediscovered the ancient path. Why was it lost to begin with?
- 📝 Why Shakyamuni Buddha choose Indian subcontinent as a favorable place to teach Buddhist way of living?
- 📝 Do you know of a Buddhist text explaining why living in a community?
- 📝 How did ancient Indian Buddhists describe causation vs correlation? Why were they concerned with this?
- 📝 Has any Buddhist meditator claimed that the mano-vijnana has a base to differentiate it from the other consciousnesses?
- 📝 Why a Buddhist prays at Hindu temple which is situated in another country and prays for the betterment of his own country?
- 📝 Why are Buddhist monks not as extreme as Jain monks when it comes to non-violence?
- 📝 Where can we find (Lost) ancient Indian text by Buddhist scholars which was Translated in other languages?
- 📝 Has any Buddhist philosopher claimed space is ideal because it is a whole?
- 📝 If buddha never got angry, why do so many buddhist teachers say anger is inescapable?
- 📝 Why did Marco Polo say the Buddhist religion originated in Sielan?
- 📝 Why Buddhist worship Mount Kailash?
- 📝 Beginner's Buddhist Course Syllabus By Ancient Pali Canon (Ganthadhura And Vipassanādhura)
- 📝 Were there any ancient Buddhist Universities, outside of India?
- 📝 If a buddhist should not kill a mouse living in their home, what justification do they have to rid themselves of a parasite such tapeworms
- 📝 When were women first welcomed into Buddhist orders?
- 📝 How can I assess the quality of a local Buddhist group?
- 📝 Can or should a Buddhist defend themselves physically?
- 📝 Why is Buddhism not Nihilism?
- 📝 Is a belief in rebirth a necessity for Buddhist practice?