If that which is aware of fear is not fearful then isn't that which is aware of happiness not happy?
Upvote:0
To answer your heading question: "that which is aware ..." Here, (1) 'that' which is aware is awareness, awareness of mental states. (2) 'What' it is aware of are mental states (for example, fear). Awareness of fear is neither the same as, awareness in general, nor the mental state of fear.
Awareness is not what negates or nullifies the anger or anxiety or any other negative mental state. It is required of course. But some thing other than mere awareness is required to nullify a negativity- That is the analytic side. That is only possible when awareness is established. (In the analytical reaosning, seeing phenomenon as empty of self does this diminishing and in the analytical meditation (vipassana) the establishing of equanimity over vedana does this).
When negative mental states are thus analysed in meditation, then by the very nature of them they get nullified. But the nature of positive mental states isnt the same. (Hence also why they are categorised as positive or negative). The removal of negative defilements also increases the positive states.
Being aware of this does not diminish happiness or joy because one, awareness does not diminish them, and two, it is not in the nature of happiness or joy to be either diminished by the mere awareness. Then the analytic meditation also does not diminish them. It in fact enhances them even further.
Upvote:2
You are correct in one part and making a faulty assumption in another.
You are correct that observing mental/emotional states with a kind of scientific detachment puts the subjective point of view in a position where pain gets less painful and exaltation gets less exalted. Buddha mentions this method in the suttas.
At the same time you make a faulty assumption that your idea of happiness is an obviously desirable state. This is perfectly expected as most people have never really thought about and don't have a clear definition of what it means to be happy.
Buddhism differentiates between a worldly kind of happy states - joy, comfort, pride etc. coming from achieving success, wealth, fame, etc. on one hand - and "spiritual" happy states (jhanas and their more casual precursors) on the other.
Now, what are these "spiritual" happy states? In Buddhist definition they are all approximations of Nirvana. "Approximations" in the sense that they are of the same essence as Nirvana, just not as complete and refined.
I don't want to get too philosophical with the subject of Nirvana here. Let's just say for the purposes of this discussion Nirvana is like an infinitely refined and perfect Peace. The technical term for this groundless boundless super-peace is "suchness" (tathata). Which clarifies the "spiritual" happy states as various approximations of the super-peace.
Now we have all the concepts we need to answer your question. If you contemplate your mental states with detachment, resulting in the worldly states fading out and ceasing to be, whether they are unhappy states or happy states, the remaining residual will be some kind of partially-peaceful state gradually approaching the super-peace of Nirvana.
To a worldly-oriented person this probably sounds scary or sad: "oh my god, I'm giving up happy states". But for a practitioner of dharma this is perfectly rational and logical: by definition all states except Nirvana have an element of "this thing over here is not perfect, i wish it were different" in them, and certainly worldly happy states are full of such bitter elements, especially after the first wave of exaltation is over. So why wouldn't I want to contemplate my worldly happiness (and even an intermediate "spiritual" happy state!) with a detached mind, knowing that the resulting state will be more satisfactory due to having fewer inner contradictions in it!
To put it simply, why would I cherish a turbulent, fleeting, partially imperfect instance of worldly happiness that won't last anyway -- if, exactly by giving that up, I can open myself to the perfect non-fleeting super-peace.
More post
- π How to make my thoughts non influencial on my happiness and presence?
- π What is a skillful way to meditate in the midst of a migraine headache?
- π Anatta and the question of motivation
- π Agitation during mindfulness tickling
- π Difficulty with Meditation Posture
- π Living worried about the future and reaching mindfulness
- π What does Buddha mean with '' to not sacrifice one's life for another' (Dhp 166)?
- π Should Buddhists avoid Amazon and Starbucks out of concerns about tax avoidance?
- π What community activities do monks in southest asia take part in?
- π Buddha's past lives in the Pali Suttas outside of Jataka
- π Is the concept of Gandhabba Brahmanical teaching?
- π How do you tell the difference between review of a path and the next path?
- π Is there a generally agreed upon idea of what Buddha nature is?
- π Has Buddha Gautama ever had problems with some autorities about his teachings and way of live?
- π How does 'Om Mani Padme Hum' protect us from danger?
- π Is the Buddha nature nothingness or the Dharmakaya?
- π Solving the oxymoron of nibbΔna?
- π Was the Buddha Humanist?
- π If someone was an Once-returner in last life how can he know that ?
- π Is it a bad heavy karma to criticize or give up your guru?
- π whether tripitak talk about marananusati or maranassati?
- π Should Lay Buddhists Teach the Dhamma?
- π Which materials exist on the construction and origin of kΕans?
- π Avoiding inner narration while practising Anapanasati
- π Cetana and Karma
- π Did Buddhism oppose Vedic religion?
- π To Be or Not to Be?
- π What meditation practice will allow me to sleep less and focus more?
- π Do you need both parents' permission to become ordained?
- π Is forgiving someone an issue in Buddhism and what does it mean?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π If that which is aware of fear is not fearful then isn't that which is aware of happiness not happy?
- π There is a text where Buddha says that the Dharma he teaches is not a secret doctrine so why are there sects which maintain secrecy?
- π Why should I focus on that which is not mine?
- π How can the Buddha (after he was enlightened) reflect that he was not at ease and then became at ease in seclusion?
- π If Rebirth is not taken literally then why seek Enlightenment?
- π What are the texts that contain words which can be attributed directly to the Buddha?
- π If Buddhism is about moderation, then why is it that you can attain nirvana only after renouncing worldly possessions?
- π Beings who are not aware of their own existence?
- π If I am not the skandhas, then what entity/group of entities am I being responsible for by being a good person?
- π Can you be aware but not conscious?
- π What's the first thing that arises, from which everything else arise?
- π Looking for an online resource of the commentary(SNA.ii.476; SA.i.155) which says that the Brahma Sahampati was an Anagami from the Suddhavasa realms
- π Sutta references which Discuss Self and Not Self under Different Contexts
- π Is there is anything which is not a phenomena?
- π When the Pali suttas say that it is not the "same" thing that is born and dies what do they mean?
- π What additional ethics you find in Buddhism which are not found in other religions?
- π What is the meaning of "Nothing new will be said here, nor have I any skill in composition. Therefore I do not imagine that I can benefit others."
- π Do Buddhists claim that if there was a self it could not be annihilated?
- π How to overcome fear of annihilation in meditation and why is it not included in list of hindrances to meditation?
- π In which sutta does the Buddha discuss his attitudes toward his audience either understanding or not understanding his teaching?
- π What does "heard" mean in "I allow fish and meat that is pure in three respects: One has not seen, heard, or suspected..."
- π Want a simple explanation that sense restraint is an important aspect of ethical conduct, for a loved one who is not into Dhamma
- π Basic dharma theory tells me that it is definitely not possible to perceive both fingers simultaneously
- π Sutta in which Buddha says that he/anyone don't have to take another person words?
- π In which sutta does a lay disciple of the Buddha tell a non-buddhist mendicant that he has experienced jhana?
- π Is it bad karma to think but not claim that one is enlightened, or just bad for your practice?
- π What causes the arising of fear that the sense of "me" will be threatened by the fruition of my practice?
- π The Buddha spoke to many individuals. Did the Buddha ever tell an individual who did not believe in rebirth, that they must in order to be liberated?
- π Which Buddhist council included the conclusions that there is no creator-god and no day of judgment?
- π How come SN Goenka thought that buying milk does not lead to suffering?