How does one Realize emptiness?

WHAT IS A ANYWAY?
A PLAY OF THE MIND?

THE PLAYERS

• The Hero & Our Weapon, The Pervader – Non-conceptual consciousness PERCEIVING whether things inherently exist or in other words whether they can be found under analysis
• The Henchman - Consciousness that normally PERCEIVES inherent existence, as if things can be found
• The Damsel, The Reason – A (or anything else), The Reason we will realise emptiness
• The Villain, The Subject – The inherent existence of A, Our Target The Happy Ending, The Predicate – Emptiness or NO A

THE SCENE

At the moment we cannot help but APPREHEND things as if they inherently existed as if they can be found (the other two ways are nominally, to one side for a moment, and as illusion-like or void).

Because a Non-Conceptual Consciousness perceiving whether things can be found under analysis, finds nothing upon analysis the subsequent pervasion of a/the reason by a predicate (Emptiness) will invalidate the subject. So because the reason is “where” it is, in the subject, a successful pervasion of the reason by the predicate will contaminate the whole subject category, INHERENT EXISTENCE. Each player must fill the roles assigned above with no cast changes. The reason why the players do what they do, the action (the analysis); the success of the pervasion is entirely up to you.

STORYLINE (PLAN) B

If we are to understand the Emptiness of A we first need to acknowledge A’s appearance as inherently existent.

STORYLINE (PLAN) A

We gain an EXPERIENCE of emptiness by attacking/refuting the findability of A.

SCENE 1 The Villain has The Damsel –

Presence of Reason in subject A or / - \ has been kidnapped by its appearance as inherently existent or as if there is an entity that can be found amongst / - . Until we realise that the Damsel cannot be found with The Henchman (in fact cannot be found at all), A exists in the category INHERENTLY EXISTENT.

SCENE 2 Introducing our Hero

If we want to find Inherent Existence it would make sense that the only weapon we can use is our consciousness that analyses WHETHER things exist inherently or whether something can be found under analysis. When, finally, we do try to find A, because it happily sits in the inherently existent category the realisation that we cannot find it should contaminate the category inherent existence for us.

SCENE 3 Payback Time

Because we accept things exist the way they appear we never have reason to look for them. But if we use our hero to try and find something simple like A then we should come to the conclusion that it cannot be found. Why? We want to profit, to experience Emptiness, so we must activate our hero to look for the A that in fact has been kidnapped by the appearance (The Henchman) that it can be found. If A exists it cannot exist separately from its parts because of a very fair criterion; to find A we must be able to point to A. But we can never point to A or / or – or . There is no A we can point to. To realize emptiness you must be utterly devoted to this criterion and look for yourself over and over and over…..

So if we 1) keep looking at A and 2) simultaneously decide enough pussy footing around we want to look for A, we activate our hero. Then 3) sorry, you cannot find/point to A either separately, outside its parts and not in its parts either. It is no good to decide that if we look for A we should find it; we must employ our hero to go and look for the damsel, A. Not finding A the category inherent existence is incidentally contaminated. So put aside valid establishment, conventional and nominal existence. The masters are clear – emptiness means not finding something, remember we are not looking for emptiness because it will do for now to say that if you cannot find something, it doesn’t exist! See The TantricDistinction,Jeffrey Hopkins Chapter1

WHAT IS A ANYWAY?
A PLAY OF THE MIND?
WHAT THE CRITICS THOUGHT!

Critic A writes that when the hero comes along, conceptual play is made redundant because he doesnt find an A, amongst / - , a true damsel amongst the aggregates.

Critic B has an alternative understanding – the hero is a hero because he is searching for a specific damsel and not just coming in with his gun ratta-tat-tat, refuting everything in sight so that even the damsel “dies” & the play ends!

Critic A understands the skilled reasoning work of the hero could be used in another play or to refute another self because the story/pervasion has a good ending.

Critic B sees the performance of the hero as focused and enough because the hero is only looking for a specific inherently existent A/damsel and that this is only successful as focused confirmation of the non-existence of a specific inherently existent A/damsel, nothing else – because even after we stop looking at “the play” in everyday life things like A are seen all the time, they continue.

Critic A sees the space-like non-finding of A under its basis of designation, / - , as a green light to write - “...because the hero's performance is so strong reason undoubtedly refutes as untrue the damsel and by extension all other “plays” and productions, the play of cause/effect, the I, an independent self, mine, objects etc in the realization of the ultimate ending (space-like non-finding Emptiness), so final it beats all ignorance in all plays and their accompanying philosophies”.

Critic B on the other hand allows themselves to be deeply affected by the ending, for them, because they allow the play to have a full focused impact, the continual non-finding of an inherently existent A acts as very freeing confirmation of the utter non-existence of an inherently existent self (the root of actual innate ignorance) that serves as the basis of the afflictions that contaminate experience rather than seeing another philosophical implication. Emptiness is not looked for or “found”!

Critic B writes – “...the space-like realization, the non-finding of an inherently existent A achieved by the hero, is fundamental not just to the way The Damsel and all conceptual play is perceived but to the way “A” is produced and hence to the way all “play” is produced because the realization of the Emptiness of one thing is as good as realization of another’s Emptiness – the truth pervades all existent things equally”.

Critic B then takes away the point of the performance allowing it to pervade their understanding of reality (what comes up) to reach a hidden meaning, not just how we perceive A as inherently existent.

Critic B writes “...A, / - , is an analogy for reality, so this “play” is trying to tell us something deeper”. Reality is all existent things that arise at once together but are empty (of inherent existence) at once together (even emptiness itself is empty). So it is said the actual difficult meaning of the non-finding of inherent existence, Emptiness, is dependent arising as only by this view all cause and effect is possible rather than annihilated by it!

Critic B most critically understands if we dont qualify the performance of the hero and if they dont exist as dependent arising’s - as do-able conditions - the much higher experiences of the actual existence of Ultimate Truths via direct perception of Emptiness couldnt be True Cessations of afflictive experience and the achievement of cessation of afflictions couldnt entail Nirvanas, so pursuit of the irreversible experience of Nirvanas as the complete liberation from suffering would be a fools game. (See The Great Treatise on the Stage of the Path to Enlightenment Vol.3 Lama Tsongkapa esp chapters 16&17)

Suññatā means more or less not / nonself, i.e., the aggregate and empty as they are not self (they are empty of self, there is no self in it), meditation attainments are empty as they are not self, sense bases are empty as it is not self, the world is empty since it is not self. Anything you call self cannot be absolutely controlled and does not last for ever and the experience always ends misery.

Also the world is made of vibrations and heat hence in this sense the world is empty, as in this answer.

To realise not self you have to do Vipassana to achieve the state of yathā-bhūta-ñāna-dassana. When progressing further in stages of sainthood you will experience Phala Samapatti where all perception and sensation stops. This is also know as empty. Even before this any attainments like Jhana is not self, hence empty. Also higher meditative attainments can be considered empty when there is no roots.

See: (1) Kāma,bhū Sutta 2, (2) Cūla Vedalla Sutta, (3) Mahā Vedalla Sutta, (4) Maha Sunnata Sutta, (5) Cula Sunnata Sutta, (6) The Greater Discourse on Voidness: The “Mahā-Suññatā Sutta” (Majjhima Nikāya No.122) And the Commentary from the Papañcasūdanī

1:

“When a monk has emerged from the attainment of cessation of perception and feeling, houselord,

3 kinds of contacts touch him, that is,

the empty contact,

the signless contact,

the undirected contact.”

3:

This is empty of self or what belongs to self

...

This, avuso, is the way of explaining by which these states are different in meaning and different in name.

Same in meaning, differing only in name

“And in what way, avuso, are these states same in meaning, differing only in name?”

(1) THE UNSHAKABLE FREEDOM OF MIND THAT IS FREE OF MEASURING

Avuso,

lust is a measure-maker;

hate is a measure-maker;

delusion is a measure-maker.

For a monk whose influxes are destroyed, they are cut off at the root, made like a palm-tree stump, done away with so that they are not subject to further growth.

Avuso, of all the immeasurable freedoms of mind, the unshakable freedom of mind is declared as the foremost. Now, that unshakable freedom of mind is empty of lust, empty of hate, empty of delusion.

(2) THE UNSHAKABLE FREEDOM OF MIND THAT IS FREE OF “THINGS.” Avuso,

lust is a something;

hate is a something;

delusion is a something.

...

6:

Voidness internally: in himself internally; the meaning is: produced in regard to his own five aggregates. [Commentary to MN 122]

“And which, friend, is the mind-deliverance of voidness? Here, friend, a bhikkhu, gone to the forest or to the root of a tree or to an empty place, considers thus: ’This is void of self or property of a self’. [MN 43]

Of self: void of self, called personality, man, person, and so on. Or property of a self: Void of anything belonging to self called requisite of robes and so forth … . The minddeliverance of voidness belongs to the sense-sphere as to plane, and its object is formations; for it is insight that is here meant by “voidness.” [Commentary to MN 43]

Possessed of full awareness: fully aware through successfully knowing the meditation subject. Externally: in regard to another’s five aggregates. Internally and externally: at one time internally, at another time externally.

^{This follows Universal Teaching of the Buddhism as preserved in the Pali Canon.}

The most concise answer I have found comes from Nagarjuna:

That which arises dependently we explain as emptiness.

Although this peculiar question seemed got a Mr./Ms. Right to claim the bride/groom, I, however, would like to offer a short answer, sometimes one's patience boiled when reading too much words. Here, my short little trick of how to realize emptiness:

It's both easy and difficult. Easy part is, to understand that the world is mind constructed; the difficult part.... hmmm... is to then walk into a wall and through it, for it's "made of" emptiness :D ~!!

Listening, Studying, Reflection are vital.

Assuming you practice sitting meditation with joyful investigation for ~30min a day, you can probably have a direct insight into emptiness from one of the excellent sutras such as the Diamond Cutter Sutra or the Heart Sutra.

It will take a lot of consistent practice but every step is closer, so in short:

Grow your bodhicitta. Cultivate a deep compassion and weep for the sufferings of all countless sentient beings. Rest in the absolute nature.

Love your teachers

A non-Buddhist answer, perhaps:

My sense of Realization is that it is part of a process of development, or maturation. We simply grow in to it eventually. Glimpses might come earlier, and even be imparted, but then it takes time to stabilize and fully develop the realization, as other answers state.

Seen this way, many approaches will work, as will "no approach" eventually, if the person is so inclined to recognize and value realization. "Seek and ye shall find." Perhaps this is why there can be so many different teachings and schools, all of which worked for someone.

The last stage, I think, is simply letting go. Or, "be let go-ed". As the old Zen story puts it, you release your hold on the cliff edge, only to realize that you were standing on firm ground all along! Ego cannot do this letting go, it arises spontaneously. So maybe the answer to your question is: "One doesn't." Or, "Oneness does" or something silly like that.

My teacher has a straight forward 4 steps method to learn and realize the Dharma

1. Listen - Learning the Dharma is frequently described in the scripture to hearing. ("Thus I have heard", "Savaka - one who hears"), essentially coming across teachings whether by paying attention to teachers, reading and so forth.

2. Contemplate - You reflect on the meanings of the Dharma, slowly making sense of it

3. Application - You apply the Dharma in your practice and your daily life.

4. Affirmation - You affirm the truth of the teachings through your practice.

Rinse and repeat as necessary.

With regards to emptiness:

You can study sutras, listen to lectures. But the fundamental break through I had with understanding emptiness in the context of Mahayana came from Nagarjuna famous stanza.

All things arise through causes and conditions.

That I declare as emptiness.

It is also a provisional designation.

It is also the meaning of the Middle Path

This is essentially rephrasing dependent origination

This is because that is

This is not because that is not

Prior to this I could hardly make sense of the Heart Sutra or the Diamond Sutra. But now more often than not feel like very much self evident truth.

And there you have it, this simple concept is all there really is into understanding emptiness. It's not some mystical transcendental experience. It is essentially a rehash of the truths of impermanence and selflessness that is staring at our face everyday. Yet the issue is actually what one do with this realization. It is not that the common person doesn't see impermanence, the common person simply refuse to accept and acknowledge these truths. As I have deepen my practice I start to observe how my friends and family including myself often act in ways that are unenlightened as if we are blind to the truths in front of our face. Our mindless cravings and anger when we don't get what we want. Our selfishness. Our attachments to very impermanent things.

The teaching of emptiness is there to break our attachments to personal views of the world which we construct, even doctrines which are held sacred such as the perfection or infallibility of the Ariyas (Stream Entry, Arahantship). We treat Stream Entry as a magical state where the Stream Entrant no longer have any feelings of doubt, in contrary to what the Buddha have stated from the beginning, that all phenomena are impermanent, and why should doubt and confidence be any different. We treat Arahants as someone who's infallible with no shred of ignorance and other afflictions, someone who attained Nirvana and will never suffer again. Even when the Buddha said that the five aggregates are impermanent, so how can the birth of sankaras be permanently ended? Wisdom is dependently originated, attainment is dependently originated, end of suffering is dependently generated, how can any of them actually be permanently attained or ended? The realizations essentially allow us to see things we ought to have seen before but couldn't due to our ignorance and delusive state of mind.

Ultimately learning the Dharma is to benefit ourselves and others. And maybe just maybe next time we face a difficult situation, we can calmly keep in mind that the situation we are facing is too impermanent and dependently generated, so that we can plant good causes and conditions while being unattached to our troubles and handle them with wisdom.

Pali Buddhism offers the following instructions for realising emptiness (suññatā):

And what is the emptiness mind-release? There is the case where a monk, having gone into the wilderness, to the root of a tree, or into an empty dwelling, considers thus: 'This is empty of self or of anything pertaining to self.'

MN 43

---

And what is empty of a self or of anything pertaining to a self?

The eye is empty of a self or of anything pertaining to a self. Forms... Eye-consciousness... Eye-contact is empty of a self or of anything pertaining to a self.

The ear is empty...

The nose is empty...

The tongue is empty...

The body is empty...

The intellect is empty of a self or of anything pertaining to a self. Mind objects... Intellect-consciousness... Intellect-contact is empty

SN 35.85

---

There is this (mental) dwelling discovered by the Tathagata where, not attending to any themes, he enters & remains in internal emptiness...If...dwelling by means of this dwelling...no covetousness or sadness...will take possession...In this way he is alert there...keeping track of arising & passing away (thus): 'Such is form, such its origination, such its disappearance. Such is feeling... Such is perception... Such are fabrications... Such is consciousness, such its origination, such its disappearance.' As he stays keeping track of arising & passing away with regard to these five aggregates, any conceit that 'I am' with regard to these five aggregates is abandoned...

MN 122

---

A monk, not attending to the perception of village, not attending to the perception of human being — attends to the singleness based on the perception of wilderness...not attending to the perception of wilderness — attends to the singleness based on the perception of earth...not attending to the perception of earth — attends to the singleness based on the perception of the dimension of the infinitude of space...not attending to the perception of the dimension of the infinitude of space — attends to the singleness based on the perception of the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness...not attending to the perception of the dimension of the infinitude of consciousness — attends to the singleness based on the perception of the dimension of nothingness...not attending to the perception of the dimension of nothingness — attends to the singleness based on the theme-less concentration of awareness...he discerns that 'Whatever is fabricated & mentally fashioned is inconstant & subject to cessation.' He discerns that 'Whatever disturbances that would exist based on the effluent of sensuality... the effluent of becoming... the effluent of ignorance, are not present. And there is only this modicum of disturbance: that connected with the six sensory spheres, dependent on this very body with life as its condition.' He discerns that 'This mode of perception is empty of the effluent of sensuality, empty of the effluent of (self) becoming, empty of the effluent of ignorance....his entry into emptiness, accords with actuality, is undistorted in meaning, pure — superior & unsurpassed.

MN 121

Suññatā means more or less not/non-self. Therefore, the instructions is the Anatta-Lakkhana Sutta may also be followed.

In summary, to realise emptiness, as described in MN 121 (above), the mind first be made empty or clear. Then the clear mind can observe everything it observes is empty/vacant/void of any self.

For example, if the mind observes a rock, cloud or tree, it can see clearly there is no 'self'/'ego' in a rock, cloud or tree. When the mind is clear, empty of thoughts & judgments, it can see the breathing & body are the same as a rock, cloud or tree, namely, empty of any self. Observing like this, the breathing will calm & feelings of rapture will arise, which are observed like a rock, cloud or tree, as empty of self. When rapture calms, the mind will be even clearer & all mental phenomena are observed the same as a rock, cloud or tree, as empty of self. This is how to realise emptiness.

To realise not-self & emptiness, the mind must do vipassana.

Through vipassana, by observing carefully with a concentrated mind, we see the Truth of all things. We realize that everything is impermanent. Anything that we are experiencing now is impermanent. Even the things of which we are unaware are impermanent, that is, continually changing and transforming. The single exception is nibbana, the only thing that does not change. Thus, we know the aniccam (impermanence) of everything. Fur­thermore, the fact of impermanence oppresses and forces us to ex­perience dukkha (unsatisfactoriness)... This state of dukkha can not be endured by anyone; there is no self or soul that can stand up to it. This is anatta. And so we realize aniccam-dukkham-anatta. Together we call them sunnata, voidness of self. Then know tathata, suchness or "just like that." This is the first step of the fourth tetrad. It is called "aniccam-nupassi." Just this one word encompasses the realization of aniccam-dukkham-anatta-sunnata-tathata!