Do we have conventional knowledge of the present?
score:2
The quote you give:
The cognition of the ultimate nature of things—their all being empty of intrinsic nature—is nonconceptual because, there being nothing to cognize, no cognition arises.
Refers to wisdom directly realizing emptiness. Such a wisdom realizes emptiness in a non-dualistic manner. It is non-conceptual and explicit, since it realizes its object (emptiness) by way of emptiness appearing to it. Conceptual consciousnesses realize their object by way of a mental image appearing to them. Cognition arise (this wisdom is a cognition) but there is no acertainment of conventional truths (such as time, a table, persons, the basis of emptiness, and so forth).
By the way, Garfield is not the safest source.
Chandrakirti (same view as Buddhapalita) also talked about "non-seeing" and "non-cognition" or "non-perception." He does not mean that a buddha is free from cognition (that would contradict the typical Mahayana claim hat he is omniscient) but simply that non-existent do not appear to a buddha. A buddha is free from the appearance of true existence. It is not so much about "no cognition" as it is about "no cognition of something in particular."
It is explained in Chandrakirti's Commentary on the "Supplement to Nagarjuna's Treatise on the Middle'.
Geshe Jamphel Gyaltsen said:
When said that they perceive it in the manner of non-perception, it does not mean that a buddha does not see anything at all. It means that he is not seeing any phenomenon arisen due to ignorance, that is, together with a false appearance of the conventional - an appearance of true existence. It is the omniscience realizing the final reality that perceives the emptiness, the absence of true existence. Since a buddha does not perceive what does not exist and knows all existing phenomena, when a truly existent conventional phenomenon were to exist, it should appear to a buddha, but it does not. What is not perceived by him is a non-existent. If it were existent it would appear to the Buddha. True establishment does not exist and therefore does not appear to the wisdom of a Buddha realizing the final reality.
Upvote:2
Finally... let me try。。。
What is the use of discussing no-cognition as it defined as "the non-existence of a thing cannot be perceived by the senses for there is nothing with which the senses could come into contact in order to perceive the non-existence." wikipedia/Anupalabdhi
It negates the negated, i.e., the non-existence, the cannot be perceived. This is from Kumārila Bhaṭṭa (700AD) the Hindu philosopher. This rendered the whole sytax just as a don't-know. Now some scholars use it to fit into the Buddhist concept, or to explain the Buddhist concept, it is an error, IMO.
The cognition of the ultimate nature of things—their all being empty of intrinsic nature—is nonconceptual because, there being nothing to cognize, no cognition arises. --Garfield and Westerhoff in Madhyamaka and Yogacara
The Buddha/Nagarjuna doesn't phase Emptiness in this way. If there are things? Ultimate nature? Cognition or to cognize is a conditioned faculty, same as the 5 Aggregates conditioned by the human body and mind as in an Ordinary (凡夫). The quoted phrase is produced by an academic mind conditioned by education with those technical terms in prescribed syntax.
Eckel in To See the Buddha...
Again, object, reality, knowledge, these terms in such way of a paragraph written doesn't relate anything to what the Buddha taught, although it claimed Buddha here and Buddha there in the sentences. It is an un-beneficial hard work to explain how it was not making sense, same as to explain why a 1 or 2 or any number is not a 0.
And obviously the heart sutra...
Your understanding the Heart Sutra is far from getting it. When in the Heart Sutra it said:
No Suffering Samudaya Extinguishing Path, no knowledge also no attainment. {無苦集滅道無智亦無得}
It is not a negation to describe "Ultimate Reality", in your term. It is because "In Emptiness it has no [such and such]... "{是故空中無...}, for these are dharma(s){法}, i.e., the laws created by us. Not the laws in law books, but laws of nature, physics, E=MC", law of gravity... all are dharma(s) - 法[則] - laws, the products of the intellect/mind. Therefore the Buddha said all knowledge of this world are "games theories" {戲論}, i.e., we set the rules, then we play against these rules. The Heart Sutra, of import is the beginning, "Observe the Self-present Bodhisattva, when professing in deep Prajnaparamita..." {觀自在菩薩行深般若波羅蜜多時...}, this is the condition a Dhyana practitioner is able to enter, then it goes on to give more instructions and describe the experiences etc... This is a long explanation and belongs to another topic I believe. Of note is almost all translated the beginning as Avalokiteshvara, it maybe so or it could be not as so. There is another definite name for this Bodhisattva in Chinese yet here this could refer to Him, or refer to anyone as long as this person who is able to reach the Self-present{自在}, one who is free, totally at ease, free from any bondage or restrain, mindful and, present. (see, this is the perfect condition one should enter during meditation.)
To conclude, I thought your formulating this question is not so beneficial in understanding the Buddhist Dharma, Emptiness, or the philosophy you intended. For it is like saying, does the cow have horse face? {牛頭不對馬嘴}. With no offence, if it does irritate you, apologize for my commend of language, since English is not my mother tongue.
More post
- 📝 Is Enlightenment a misleading ideal?
- 📝 Linking Madhyamaka emptiness to Theravada emptiness through papanca
- 📝 Which sutta is it in which Sariputta asks his disciples .. friend if someone asks, is the world eternal
- 📝 Vipassana sharpens my ability to feel the feelings of others, but I'm not yet sure how best to use that?
- 📝 Sutras says that there is nothing to attain: but is there a beginning to attaining nirvana?
- 📝 Sociality and meditation
- 📝 Does Nagarjuna's Middle Treatise 24:18 teach real knowledge?
- 📝 Deep emptiness (nothingness) while meditating
- 📝 Do Buddhists have sacred scripture to read?
- 📝 Did the Buddha narcistically judge people unfairly with self-conceit?
- 📝 Find the motivation to meditate
- 📝 Four Analytical Knowledges
- 📝 Am I following Buddhism as a sort of Escapism?
- 📝 How should a married person get ordained in Theravada Buddhism?
- 📝 Incorporeal entities in buddhism
- 📝 Bad behavior (and therefore bad kamma?) due to physical ailments
- 📝 How should I take the concept of 'identical being'?
- 📝 I love life and I don't want to die. How to let go?
- 📝 What do the words of the Mahayana Buddhist mean?
- 📝 What is the effect of giving 'Dana' to the gift recipient's mind?
- 📝 Any ideas about the energy feel I constantly have?
- 📝 Diagnose: Samatha practice led to an urge to contract PC muscle, and pleasant vibrations resulted
- 📝 How can I make amends with the one I wronged?
- 📝 5 precepts and the mental factor of sila
- 📝 Buddhism Perspective on Frustration
- 📝 How do you recognize the attainment of enlightenment?
- 📝 Is there a set of daily reminders and daily reflections one can contemplate on?
- 📝 Meaning of 'kalapas'
- 📝 Which canon and traditions does the Flower Sermon text belong to?
- 📝 Do thoughts 'create' vedana?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Do we have conventional knowledge of the present?
- 📝 Does every Buddha have knowledge of the past, present and future?
- 📝 Have Matreiya ever meet the present buddha?
- 📝 Have any Buddhist thinkers responded to the critique of the Brahma Sutras?
- 📝 Can one practice meditation to gain knowledge about the universe?
- 📝 Can a person live by the Dhamma and have another religion as well?
- 📝 Are the Chakras present in the original Buddha's teachings?
- 📝 Where's the story in which the Buddha praised a non-returner for keeping the knowledge of his attainment private?
- 📝 Through the Processes of Jhana does it have a Permanent effect or temporary effect on your life
- 📝 Have all human beings got the capacity for compassion?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have advice about dealing with social anxiety?
- 📝 Does understanding the Visuddhimagga require a knowledge of the Pali Canon?
- 📝 Does Pure Land Buddhism ever have a Buddha other than Amitābha as the object of devotion?
- 📝 What is the Distinction Between Knowledge of The Path and the Fruit?
- 📝 Is it possible to set goals for the future and be present at the same time?
- 📝 Zen's concern with "reality" vs. being in the present
- 📝 Did the Buddha have more advice for the lay follower than is typically supposed?
- 📝 prior life what hope can we have related to our present life?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have long ears?
- 📝 If we have the law of karma, why do we need other laws, or do we?
- 📝 Who are the Buddhas Yet to Come and what Information do we have about them as per Theravada standpoint?
- 📝 Anesthesia, being knocked out, unconsciousness...what does the Buddha have to say about it?
- 📝 Why do you have sadness in the first Jhana?
- 📝 The Buddha is said to have rediscovered the ancient path. Why was it lost to begin with?
- 📝 💚What does the idea of "separation" have to do with the Buddha's teaching?
- 📝 What was the 1st attempt to have a Theravada monastery in the West?
- 📝 What is the difference between knowledge and wisdom?
- 📝 How do you develop the right view with lack of information, knowledge and time?
- 📝 For what reason did the Dali Lama's traditional daily schedule have washing before meditation?
- 📝 Did the Buddha have special instructions to deal with masturbation?