Upvote:6
The tourist tax is a legitimate tax, and it varies across Indonesia because it is applied at the local district level rather than as a national tax. Areas that are more likely to see tourist activity and do not have other income sources are those most likely to apply a tourist tax, with Bali being a prime example.
The best source I've found for this information are non-governmental sites:
The tax is a regional tax called PB1 or PHR (Hotel and Restaurant Tax) of 10%. It is collected by a Kabupaten (Regency) or a City, like Jakarta DKI.
District governments (kabupatens) are authorised to levy the following six taxes:
- Advertis*m*nt tax: 25 percent on annual value of advertising
- Base mineral extraction tax: 20 percent on market value of extraction
- Entertainment tax: imposed as a percentage of ticket price - maximum 35 percent
- Hotel and restaurant tax: 10 percent
- Street lighting tax: tax on electricity consumption - 10 percent maximum
- Water tax: maximum levy of 20 percent on a complicated base involving water usage
There is no mandatory standard as to how the tax should be applied and collected, e.g. it could be included in the overall charge or it could be listed separately.
It appears that, as you note, application of the tax varies. Unfortunately I can't find a reference to what is considered a "restaurant", as I suspect that is part of why some don't collect it, but it may also be applied only to those catering to a tourist base in some cases (not unusual outside of Indonesia).