What exactly is this 1795 German "Berichte" Document?
score:14
This is a very little part of an extensive legal dispute regarding the regency of Friedrich Karl zu Wied-Neuwied. The complete title is „Unterthänigste Berichte der Fürstlich Wied-Neuwiedischen Regierung an die regierenden Herrn Fürsten zu Wied-Runkel und Wittgenstein-Berleburg. Das von den Wied-Neuwiedischen Landes-Unterthanen, einer hohen Reichsversammlung übergebene und den 21ten Jänner 1795 zur Diktatur gebrachte Memorial betreffend“. The text cited in the question is the first addendum („Anl.“, in german „Anlage“ or addendum; „Lit. A“ is the first one) to that Bericht.
In 1791, a lawsuit between the sovereigns of Neuwied and their subordinates was settled by a "mutual agreement". Part of the agreement were the abolition of serfdom and the transmission of estates. This settlement wasn't accepted by everyone, especially some relatives of Friedrich Karl zu Wied-Neuwied, who tried to have Friedrich Karl declared legally incapable (in german: „Entmündigung“ - i'm not sure if my english translation is correct). Involved were the reich's "supreme court" (Reichskammergericht) and even the Reichstag.
The „Bericht“ is some sort of report in favour of the counts Carl zu Wied-Runkel and Christian zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg. The "supplement A" is a reply by a clerk named „von Grollmann“ on behalf of the count of Kleve (the king of prussia) regarding a complaint of some inhabitants of Neuwied. The king of prussia was appointed to govern Neuwied during the legal disputes regarding the regency of Friedrich Karl zu Wied-Neuwied. The complaint was rejected, and that rejection was used by the supporters of Carl zu Wied-Runkel and Christian zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg to discredit the opposite party.
Regarding the LS and the signature: the LS is the placeholder for the seal that was applied to the transcript; „v[on] Mülmann“ is the name of the clerk who issued the transcript.
Since that lawsuit was quite spectacular, i'm quit sure there's some literature in english. If literature in german would be helpful, too, you may take a look on: „Der Rekurs des Fürsten Friedrich Karl von Wied-Neuwied. Zum Verhältnis von Reichskammergericht und Reichstag am Ende des Alten Reiches“ by Karl Härter, in: „Vorträge zur Justizforschung. Geschichte und Theorie“, vol 2 (1993), pp. 245-284.
Upvote:3
Now that the smart folks here have figured out what this is about, I was able to google a contemporary (!!) English sumamry of the case (written in 1794 so it does not take later developments into account, naturally): here.
Another contemporary source which refers to the case, if rather tangentially, is the early (if not first ever) conspiracy theorist Barruel who claimed that the Neuweid situation had Illuminati written all over it. See here for his book. I don't know if any of his "facts" are true but since he was a contemporary, his reference to the matter might be useful.
Upvote:4
LS means "locus sigilli", "place for the seal". (Overlap with the excellent answer by tohuwawohu.)
Upvote:8
Copia.
Anl. Litl A.
In Gemäßheit eines aus Sr. königlichen Majestät von Preussen meines allergnädigsten Herrn Departement der auswärtigen Angelegenheiten an mich ergangen allerhöchsten Befehls, wird dem Joh. Wilh. Saußer, Joh. Wilh. Schulz, Phillip Saußer, Wilh. Hayn und Joh. Wilh. Krumscheid hiermit alles Ernstes bedeutet, daß sie sich nicht weiter unterfangen sollen, Sr. königlichen Majestät in Betreff des von Allerhöchst denenselben übernommen Protektionsauftrags, mit unmittelbaren Vorstellungen, als sowie sie lediglich an das competente höchste Reichgericht verwiesen werden, zu behelligen. Die Supplicaten sind als Deputiere einzelner Bauerngemeinden ohnehin nicht einmal befugt, Namens des ganzen Landes aufzutreten, und es ist höchst verwegen und strafbar, wenn sie sich über die auf den Grund der ergangengen Erkentnisse und kaiserlichen Mandate getroffenen Maasregeln in ihrer immediaten Eingabe uns geziemende Aeusserungen erlaubet haben. Da auch Sr. köngl. Majestät bereits aus eigener Bewegung gnädigst geruhet haben, das bisherige stärkere Cavallerie-Detaschement durch ein um die Hälfte schwächeres Infanterie-Commando ablösen zu lassen; so ist solches mehr Gnade, als Supplikanten et Cons., bey ihrer immer fortdaueren Widersetzlichkeit haben erwarten können.
Cleve, den 26ten July 1793.
Sr. königl. Majestät von Preussen zu Allerhöchstdero Clevischen Landesregierung verordneter Geheime Rath und von den höchstdenselben subdeligierter kaiserl Commissarius von Grollmann.
Dass vorliegende Abschrift ihrem Original völlig gleichlautend seie, wird mir vorgedrucktem Regierungs, Insiegel und meiner Unterschift herdurch attestiere. Neuwied den 2ten May 1795.
v. Mülmann,
ass. qua secret. regim.
That's the best I could make out of it - I've marked unintelligible parts with [unleserlich] (and a few I could read but where I didn't recognize the word).
Just to get the gist of it:
In the first paragraph von Grollman (due to the authority given to him by the King of Prussia and the foreign department) tells Wilh. Säußer, Joh. Wich Schulz, Philip Säußer, Wilh. Hayn und Joh. Wilh. Krumscheid that they shall not bother the king (who took the mandate to govern the region temporarily) anymore with their submissions but should take it to the supreme/highest court.
The 2nd paragraph implies that the names given above are deputies of individual peasant communities and as such are not advised, or even allowed, to suggest things beyond their pay-grade.
Then it says that the king, by himself, proposed replacing a cavalry detachment with a infantry commando, with half the man size - and that this is more than the deupties should have expected, given their persistent defiance.
The indented parts is the title of von Grollman and the bottom paragraph is about record keeping (that this copy is word for word as the original)
More post
- 📝 Why is rum naval?
- 📝 Why does Texas have the right to split?
- 📝 How to research a Victorian company
- 📝 Changes to the school leaving dates in Scotland and Northern Ireland
- 📝 is Ubaid 0 actually related to Eridu and Ubaid I-IV?
- 📝 Was there any separation between hunting bow technology and weapon bows?
- 📝 Did archers lay on their back to draw bows?
- 📝 Why is the Harappa (Indus Valley) civilization considered one of the six independent cradles of civilization?
- 📝 Did James I link the divine right of kings to apostolic succession in his writings? If so, where?
- 📝 Did NATO ever make plans for an unprovoked attack at the Soviet Union?
- 📝 Could the Confederates have done better at Gettysburg if they had put cavalry in front of, rather than behind, Pickett's charge?
- 📝 How was early Indian history re-constructed?
- 📝 Why don't people without access to clean water drink beer anymore?
- 📝 Are Americans More Obsessed With the Military Aspect of History? If so, why?
- 📝 Why did the Irish Free State suppress news of the Holocaust in 1945? Reaction once it became known?
- 📝 Did Aurangzeb issue a farman promising 4 Rs for all males that convert and 2 Rs for females?
- 📝 How common was decimation in the Roman army?
- 📝 Why, and how, did chain stores come into being?
- 📝 How long did Latin survive in Bavaria?
- 📝 Are there any known instances of sub-Saharan African democracy before European colonialism?
- 📝 Was there any kind of detective in Ancient Rome?
- 📝 How many warriors (troops) did feudal vassals have to provide to the king?
- 📝 When did they start mass-producing imitation leather?
- 📝 Evolution of United States' world role?
- 📝 Why was Eisenhower chosen to be Supreme Allied Commander in Europe?
- 📝 How could a skilled battle commander like Napoleon Bonaparte lose to Prussians at Waterloo (Belgium) as such?
- 📝 What is this military uniform from the 1870s?
- 📝 Was there an embargo of Soviet gold in 1932, and was grain the primary exportable good?
- 📝 Ports Used by French Navy in 1792 and Strength of Fleet
- 📝 Is the story of Plato's arrest at Aegina plausible?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 What exactly is this 1795 German "Berichte" Document?
- 📝 What era is this German 10 DM banknote from?
- 📝 What is this document marked "Palestine Bearer Bond"?
- 📝 What does this 1960 West German political cartoon mean?
- 📝 What mysterious Flemish peasant activity is depicted in this painting?
- 📝 What did the Emancipation Proclamation exactly do?
- 📝 What is the logic for the map maker classifying the map this way, specifically in Canada?
- 📝 What do the numbers on this 1960s anti-integration sign mean?
- 📝 Did Rothschild say this famous quote? If yes, what did he mean by it?
- 📝 What is this symbol in a financial record from Wisconsin, USA, in 1860?
- 📝 What exactly is the US national anthem?
- 📝 What is the date and original source of this medieval picture?
- 📝 What coin is this and where is it from? Thai script, Thai arms. Rev: left facing portrait
- 📝 What are the text and subtext of this 1949 Soviet cartoon?
- 📝 What is the object moving across the ceiling in this stock footage?
- 📝 What is this household object from early 1900s rural Russia?
- 📝 Anyone know what this stone building is?
- 📝 In this cartoon from Puck, what indicates the identities of France and Britain?
- 📝 What is this strange symbol painted on bas*m*nt floor?
- 📝 What is this military patch with the silhouette of a pegasus on it?
- 📝 What was the ratio of German to Soviet losses on Eastern front during different stages of the war?
- 📝 What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?
- 📝 What exactly was East Prussia between 1933 and 1945? Was it part of a larger government, and which one?
- 📝 Did Joseph Goebbels really say this about German opposition in 1933?
- 📝 What East German laws and regulations were extended to the West after unification?
- 📝 What is the spiral-looking device shown in this wall painting?
- 📝 What was the "Favorable result" that the German admiralty was expecting from the naval attack on the Royal Navy in 1918?
- 📝 What is the primary source for this quote by Julius Caesar's on Celts and Germans?
- 📝 Who are the three men standing and what are they holding at this University of Paris Doctors' Meeting?
- 📝 What type of plane is this wreck?