Were B-17s (rather than B-29s) ever used to bomb mainland Japanese territory during WW2 (at least before the capture of Okinawa)?
score:21
No, B-17s do not ever seem to have attacked the Japanese Home Islands. The Chomsky claims are a weird mixture of truth and fantasy.
There certainly were B-17s based in the Philippines in 1941, mostly destroyed by Japanese attacks when the war started. They could not have bombed Japan from there, as they didn't have anything like the necessary range. The B-17's combat radius was less than 1,000 miles and the round trip from the Philippines to Japan is 3,000 miles or more.
If the use of bases in Siberia had been possible, B-17s could have attacked Japan, but this would have involved the USSR going to war with Japan, and Stalin refused to do that until after the defeat of Germany.
While B-17s served as bombers in the Pacific until mid-1943, they were never based anywhere that would have enabled them to reach Japan. After that, they had been replaced by B-24s and B-29s. B-17s were used as lifeboat-dropping aircraft for air-sea rescue for the rest of the war, and for years afterwards, but that isn't bombing service.
Upvote:0
B-17's wouldn't/couldn't be used to bomb mainland Japan until just before Operation Olympic. They, along with B-24's and Lancaster's could use fields in Okinawa an a couple of Islands scheduled for invasion at the end of August, beginning of September, just south of Kyushu. It would have taken that long to build up the fields and move the Air Groups from Europe to Okinawa. At the same time, most B-17 units were transitioning to the B-29 anyway, so mostly B-24's would make it, but not B-17's.
Upvote:3
True, true. There were but two bomber groups in the South Pacific Theater that operated B-17s, the 19th and the 43rd. The 19th had been in action since the beginning and with arrival of the B-24 equipped 90th Bomber Group, was rotated back to it States. The B-24 proved superior to the B-17 due to its designed long distance over water capability. The in-theater 43rd Bomber Group transitioned to the B-24 by mid-1943, and USAAF B-17s in the Hawaiian Sea Frontier command were replaced By B-24s shortly after Midway as well, and that was the end of B-17 deployments in the Pacific. No, B-17s did not operate over the Japanese home islands at any point in the war. For the bare-bones presentation on the B-24 supplanting the B-17 in the Pacific and CBI theaters see https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/2017/06/30/boeing-b-17-flying-fortress-vs-the-consolidated-b-24-liberator/ In addition to the long-range reconnaissance missions for the USAAF, the USMC and the USN operated the PB4Y, the naval version of the B-24, in long range patrol and photo-reconnaissance missions.
Late edit, now that I think a bit more, Add that the only B-17s flying over Japan during the war were being flown by the Japanese. They had three of them, one pieced together from pieces-parts from wrecks in the Philippines and two captured intact in Java.
Upvote:3
Early versions of B-17 could likely reach SW Japan from Philippines
Since other answers pretty much explained that B-17 was not used against mainland Japan in actual war, I would like to address situation concerning B-17 on Philippines in 1941, slightly before Pacific war broke out. First of all, we must understand that version of B-17 deployed there were C and D with projected deployment of E version . B-17E was first truly mass produced variant.
Did these early variants had the range to hit Japan ? Well, maximum ferry range without refueling for E is cited as 3200 miles. Therefore, it could be expected that operational range with reduced payload could be around or somewhat less than 1500 miles. It is interesting to note that sites like airwar.ru give higher operational range to D variant compared to E variant. This could be explained by improvements in armor and defensive armament on E version. Finally, we have this official document which gives B-17E max range at 3060 miles (one way) with takeoff weight of 55 000 pounds and 2500 gallons of fuel. On the other hand, distance between Manila and Nagasaki (city in SW Japan) is somewhat bellow 1380 miles. Clark Airfield (where B-17 were stationed) is roughly at the same distance. Of course, B-17 were well in the range of Taiwan (Formosa) and Japanese bases there.
What was Japanese position about all of this ? In 1941 IJN had early variants of A6M Zero which was not much of a bomber destroyer. But IJN would probably not be tasked with air defense of mainland. Their counterpart IJA had early versions of Ki-43 which was even worse in this regard. True, there was Ki-44 but they were not yet operational, similar to Ki-45. Also, Japanese did not know exact range of B-17. They could watch occasional propaganda that appeared in US press and movies like Test Pilot. Their own experiences could have blinded them, because even their twin-engined bombers like G3M had enormous range. In retrospective, US deployment of B-17 to Philippines may have actually pushed Japan towards war instead of serving as deterrence. In a typical Japanese manner, Japanese ruling circles may have deduced it is better to strike and capture Philippines instead of waiting for US long-range aviation to grow even stronger.
More post
- 📝 Were there any elections under the Vichy regime?
- 📝 Can anyone help identify this World War One uniform?
- 📝 What is the story of this kamon?
- 📝 What is the meaning of this samurai crest?
- 📝 Were the North Vietnamese close to collapse in 1972?
- 📝 Are records on the meetings of the Japanese war council during 1945 publicly available?
- 📝 Did Hongwu Emperor flay 5000 women, and why?
- 📝 Why did China annex Tibet?
- 📝 Was there an Act of Oblivion in 1686 for those involved in the Monmouth Rebellion 1685?
- 📝 Can we classify holocaust as Hitler's war time strategic mistake?
- 📝 Who is the earliest recorded person?
- 📝 Marriage for executioners in Medieval times
- 📝 The nature of the Preliminary Articles of Peace of 1782
- 📝 How did the American Civil War help the U.S economy recover from the Panic of 1857 given that civil wars are extremely destructive?
- 📝 Has there ever been any assassination so that another assassination could happen during the first one's funeral?
- 📝 Was a bomb or shell ever dropped directly down the funnel of a warship?
- 📝 Was an adobe fort or a palisade fort more defensible?
- 📝 Did ordinary people during Hatshepsut's reign know she was a woman?
- 📝 Does the Catholic church have a long history of child abuse, or is it something that started in our time?
- 📝 History of scientific regression
- 📝 Vatican hidden (secret) rooms and passages?
- 📝 Is the Tokugawa escape scene in Clavell's "Shogun" historically accurate?
- 📝 In the context of Ancient Egypt, what could "Priest of On" mean?
- 📝 When did civilians in Europe gain access to breech-loaded firearms?
- 📝 Mexico has the right to possess firearms?
- 📝 When did the news start reporting 'women and children were killed'
- 📝 What does it mean to "take the Cross"
- 📝 Are there any known instances of sub-Saharan African democracy before European colonialism?
- 📝 How much of the Napoleonic wars were paid by the sale of Louisiana?
- 📝 What's the advantage of the infantry column formation in the Napoleonic Wars?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Were B-17s (rather than B-29s) ever used to bomb mainland Japanese territory during WW2 (at least before the capture of Okinawa)?
- 📝 Were there any Roman villas in Britain which were used rather than destroyed after the Romans left?
- 📝 Were toilets used more than once as a weapon in a military conflict?
- 📝 How was the naval battle of Guadalcanal affected by Japanese ships loading High Explosive shells rather than Armor Piercing?
- 📝 Was the death toll in the atomic bombing of Japanese territory greater than was expected by the US?
- 📝 Did MacArthur ever consider ordering Wainwright's troops to fight an insurgency war, rather than surrendering?
- 📝 Why were the 8th Route Army better at fighting the Japanese than the Nationalists were?
- 📝 Were the Nazis actually ever horrified of anything that the Imperial Japanese Army did or vice-versa?
- 📝 Why were some German and Japanese cities bombed more than others during WW2? Is there a scientific consensus?
- 📝 Were there high-ranking Japanese POW as witness at the Trinity Atomic Bomb Test?
- 📝 How much smaller were medieval farm animals in England than today?
- 📝 What drugs were used in England during the High Middle Ages?
- 📝 Why were Navajo code talkers used during WW2?
- 📝 Why were so many more Jewish men than Jewish women killed during the Holocaust?
- 📝 Why was the Council of Nicea held in Nicea rather than Rome or Constantinople?
- 📝 When were swords last used in European warfare?
- 📝 Why was World War I ended on Nov 11 11:00, rather than immediately upon signing the armistice?
- 📝 Has there ever been a cold war other than between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R.?
- 📝 Why did the Germans use the Enigma machine rather than the far superior "Lorenz" cipher machine?
- 📝 Which countries (or comparable geographical units) have a lower population now than they used to at some point in history before 1950?
- 📝 How were drawbridges and portcullises used tactically?
- 📝 When was Silver ever more valuable than Gold?
- 📝 Were the living standards in Medieval Europe a lot worse than in the Muslim world?
- 📝 Were slings used for throwing hand grenades? If not, why?
- 📝 Is it true that there are more slaves in the world now than ever at one point in history?
- 📝 What were sandbags used for in medieval duels?
- 📝 What kind of ink was used by medieval scribes in Iceland, given that there were no plant galls for iron-gall ink?
- 📝 Why was Kaliningrad placed under the Russian SFSR rather than the Lithuanian SSR?
- 📝 Who said: "Armies prepare to fight their last war, rather than their next war"?
- 📝 Why was the Roman Empire considered an empire rather than a kingdom (again)?