Why aren't the Americas named after Christopher Columbus

score:7

Accepted answer

There is a mounting body of evidence that the continent (originally the area of Newfoundland) is actually named after Richard Amerike, of Bristol.

Amerike was very involved in arranging and aiding the voyages of John Cabot (Giovanni Cabotto) to the new world. In fact, he bore a great deal of the cost of these expeditions, hoping to gain new trade business from the new world.

Cabot's maps were sent to Columbus, and were therefore available also to Vespucci, which is where Waldseemüller got the name from.

Generally, like the city of Washington in the district of Columbia, places are usually given the surname of the person they are being named after, rather than the first name. The obvious exception being royalty, of course, hence Jamestown or Port Elizabeth.

Edit: The modern reappearance of this theory is from "Richard Ameryk and the Name America", Hudd, Alfred E., Proceedings of the Clifton Antiquarian Club, 1910.

A more modern, popular reading version is availble in the book "Terra Incognita: The True Story of How America Got Its Name", Broome, Rodney, 2001.

Upvote:13

According to I Am America. (And So?), a New York Times article by Wyatt Mason (published in 2007), the German cartographer Martin Waldseemüller was "misled by a document known as the Soderini Letter, a narrative account said to have been by Vespucci but believed by modern scholars to have been forged by unscrupulous publishers."

The Soderini Letter insinuated that Vespucci reached the continent before Columbus, so Waldseemüller called it America on his map. In later versions he changed it to Terra Incognita, but the damage had already been done, as his first edition had been widely copied.

More post

Search Posts

Related post