Were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary?
Upvote:8
As of the Nagasaki bombing, the Japanese had no intention of surrendering. They had asked the Soviet Union to serve as go-between with the Allies, and had never managed to come up with what they wanted to say. It is possible that the Soviet attack had something to do with the Japanese surrender, but I haven't seen good evidence of that. The Imperial rescript announcing the surrender mentioned the atomic bomb and no other specifics. What I've read of the top official discussions seems to indicate that the fact that the US had two atomic bombs suggested that the US could destroy Japan without an invasion.
Now, the Japanese occupied a lot of heavily populated areas, and they were not good occupiers. As far as I can tell something between 100,000 and 200,000 Chinese were dying each month from the occupation. This suggests that one or two months' delay in surrender would have killed as many Chinese civilians as Japanese civilians were killed by the bombing. The Japanese also occupied Malaya, Indochina, and most of Indonesia, and people were dying there. Unless the Japanese were surrendering in response to the Soviet attacks, I've never seen any suggestion that Japan would have surrendered before about November.
Therefore, there are very good reasons to think that not using the nukes would have killed more civilians than it saved.
Upvote:25
I think there are a couple of points in your question which I think need clarification and context:
- "Before the Japanese could surrender" : There seems to be an implication here that Japan was about to surrender and didn't quite get the chance. The second bombing occurred three days after the first. The regime in Japan had made it very clear over a long and painful conflict in the Pacific that they were not willing to surrender at any price.
- "The two bombs killed over 200,000 people" : In the preceding months over a half a million civilians had been killed by conventional firebombing of Japanese cities.
- "a simple naval blockade" : There is nothing simple or practical about a naval blockade of Japan. The Japanese home islands encompass a huge area (~377 thousand square kilometers) with a massive capacity to feed itself. The Japanese nation could have survived indefinitely (albeit suffering terribly) and a land invasion would have been inevitable.
So assuming my premise that a land invasion would have been necessary to force a Japanese surrender I present the following argument that the bombings did indeed save lives.
Taking the best case estimates (the worst case estimates are much higher) of civilian deaths during the invasion of Okinawa, one tenth of the population (42,000 people), and applying this to the Japanese population in 1945 (71,998,104 people) results in a staggering seven million civilian deaths. If this number seems out of proportion or unrealistic then consider that between six and seventeen million Chinese civilians died during the war. The potential for conventional weapons to kill civilians on a massive scale had already been well proven by the time the United States elected to use nuclear weapons in Japan.
I believe the answer to your question is yes, the bombings were necessary to end the war. They gave the Japanese regime a powerful and politically viable reason to override the culturally ingrained "no surrender" ethos.
More post
- 📝 Government started within another government
- 📝 Did the Romans "copy" their political system from the Greeks?
- 📝 How long would a letter take to arrive in Geneva from Ingolstadt? (Georgian era)
- 📝 What is known about the possibility of a "real King Arthur"?
- 📝 Which countries have used rail bikes in their armed forces?
- 📝 "We, who've been connected by blood to Prussia's throne and people since Düppel"
- 📝 Barring 1784, when has UK Parliament's legal sovereignty over-ridden the electorate's political sovereignty?
- 📝 Why did Heth go towards Gettysburg on July 1, 1863?
- 📝 How were new states admitted to the Union?
- 📝 Instances of the UN defusing serious crises
- 📝 Why didn't Turkish become an official language in former Ottoman colonies in the Middle-East and North Africa?
- 📝 Are there any exemplars of the 'trope of the exiled poet' prior to CE 8?
- 📝 Were there trains to anonymous concentration camps?
- 📝 When did most European countries limit citizens’ rights to possess weaponry?
- 📝 Status of merchants in feudal Europe
- 📝 What was the Janissaries' Strength?
- 📝 Were Confederate pikes just a curious item to laugh at?
- 📝 How did the British Army unit size and structure in WWI change from 1915 to 1918?
- 📝 Why is no one claiming the title of Caliph?
- 📝 What were the founding fathers' views on Native Americans?
- 📝 How is it possible to be ambushed twice at the same place?
- 📝 How can Germany be blamed for World War 1?
- 📝 Has there ever been a US election that flipped as many state seats as the 2010 midterm elections?
- 📝 Has there ever been a month with 32 days?
- 📝 Is it true that novel 1984 became famous under US propaganda?
- 📝 Is whig history generally considered to be 'bad' history?
- 📝 Why did Greeks and Romans dilute their wine?
- 📝 When was King John of England given the name 'Dollheart', and who first used it?
- 📝 What police department served the Kenwood neighborhood in Chicago in 1907?
- 📝 Why is the Maya civilization not considered one of the cradles of civilization?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki necessary?
- 📝 How have the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki affected Japanese culture and language?
- 📝 What do the modern Japanese people think about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 How many lives were estimated to have been saved by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs?
- 📝 What were the EMP effects, if any, of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 Were there any pilots that declined to carry out the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 Did the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki contribute to Japan's surrender?
- 📝 What were the original casualty projections for Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 📝 What were Hiroshima and Nagasaki known for prior to World War II?
- 📝 What was the extent of Japanese control after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs and before surrender?
- 📝 Why were helmets and other body armour not commonplace in the 1800s?
- 📝 In the "Christmas truce" of 1914 were there any football (soccer) matches between British and German troops?
- 📝 Why were the drawings of Colossus burnt after WW2 and why was its very existence "of course" kept secret?
- 📝 Why were British ships not of the same quality as French and Spanish ships until the latter part of the 18th century?
- 📝 How were the cities of Milan and Bruges spared by the Black Death?
- 📝 Were there any Germans in Japan after the surrender of Germany in May, 1945 and if so, what happened to them?
- 📝 In WWII, what were the major differences in tank combat on the eastern and western fronts?
- 📝 Were Alexander the Great and Hephaestion lovers?
- 📝 When and where were the first coins made showing the currency or a face value?
- 📝 Why were the Germans and Russians so fixated on an unlikely "separate peace" in 1945?
- 📝 How expensive were castles? And how were the costs distributed?
- 📝 What East German laws and regulations were extended to the West after unification?
- 📝 Were there any crops and livestock common to both the Old and New Worlds prior to the Columbian exchange?
- 📝 What were the demographics and economics of South-East Asian islands around year 1400?
- 📝 When did the English and Americans realize that vegetables were healthy?
- 📝 Were bookshops 'common' in the late 19th century, and how did they differ from modern ones?
- 📝 How accurate and detailed were geographical maps created and updated by the Romans?
- 📝 What were the Nazi racial views on Hungarians and the Japanese?
- 📝 At what point were the most current and former US Presidents alive?
- 📝 How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them?