Why was the number of U.S. Representatives limited?
score:15
Pretty much correct Wladmir, this article shows the growth over time, but it was all due to the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929: http://www.thirty-thousand.org/pages/Why_435.htm
As noted here: http://artandhistory.house.gov/highlights.aspx?action=view&intID=200 this came down to a fight after the 1920 Census, where apportionment did not happen, so it was mandated to be at the current level which was 435 at the time.
A battle erupted between rural and urban factions, causing the House (for the only time in its history) to fail to reapportion itself following the 1920 Census. Signed into law on June 18, 1929, the Permanent Apportionment Act capped House Membership at the level established after the 1910 Census and created a procedure for automatically reapportioning House seats after every decennial census.
At some point it had to stop, although it seems as if Congress could change it again if they wanted to, so long as the apportionment stay as constitutionally derived.
Upvote:1
One factor I don't see mentioned, but which has to be seen as a limiting factor, is the size of the physical US Capitol building. It is a historic building, having been built in the early 19th Century and expanded to (mostly) its current state in the mid 19th. The House Chamber only has 448 permanent seats. I suppose you could start sitting extra representatives in the gallery, but that would remove that seating area from public use (which would be a crying shame). So expanding the number of representatives much past the current 435 would require an extensive remodeling, or worse yet, a larger chamber.
There is so much history in that Chamber that frankly, tearing it down to build a new one would be a crime against history.
Upvote:3
Just to expand on MichaelF's answer, the House began to debate the increasing size of Congress after the 1910 census. There was worry that the House was becoming unwieldy, but as Representative Edgar Crumpacker stated:
Members are . . . supposed to reflect the opinion and to stand for the wishes of their constituents.
If we make the ratio [of persons per Representative] too large the idea of representation becomes attenuated and less definite. The personal interest of the voter in his representative becomes less important to him, and we may lose something of the vital strength of our representative form of government.
So there was concern on both sides of the apportionment issue. On the one hand there were too many representatives, and on the other hand there were not enough because they were now representing far more people than the 30,000 originally envisioned. The 1910 Apportionment Act had set the house at 433.
The people that were in favor of fixing the number were in part drawn from rural parts of the country that feared losing out on their proportion of power to the fastly urbanized parts of the country. Those in favor of fixing the number eventually won out so they passed the Apportionment Act of 1929 which fixed the number at 435.
If you are interested there is an excellent layout of the various methods that have been employed for reapportionment by Congresses throughout the years: Methods of Apportionment.
More post
- 📝 Historical Statistical Analysis on the Length of Court Proceedings in the US?
- 📝 Why did Gibbon call the Aegean Sea 'Holy'?
- 📝 What is the earliest known writing associating the number three with the dimension of the world?
- 📝 How many Spartan boys survived army training?
- 📝 Why were there "Tributary States" to the Ottoman Empire?
- 📝 Is this a case of “cut and paste” of two different weapons?
- 📝 Why did Charles the Bold have long fingernails?
- 📝 What is the oldest musical composition that can still be listened to today?
- 📝 What was the death toll during the Inquisition?
- 📝 Were there international Islamist movements before the US started supporting islamists in Afghanistan?
- 📝 What happened at the Battle (or not?) of Luding Bridge, during the Long March of Chinese Communists in 1935?
- 📝 Were German WWII-era U-Boat crews allowed on deck?
- 📝 Why were the Scandinavians not as expansive as other Europeans in global colonization?
- 📝 Help to identify WW1 or WWII badge
- 📝 Index of importance / economic value various minerals during the Industrial Revolution
- 📝 How could lower judges ignore the US Supreme Court?
- 📝 How likely it is that a nobleman of the eighteenth century would give written instructions to his maids?
- 📝 What was the role of state sacrifices and music in Ming China?
- 📝 Are there any Ancient Greek texts showing concern for the fate of their slaves?
- 📝 What is the best historical example of conflict between two cultures with differing levels of technology?
- 📝 Why were the Yellow River dyke repairs delayed?
- 📝 Row for powers of 10 on 1950's French typewriter keyboards
- 📝 How do modern historians evaluate Sherman's "Total War"?
- 📝 What "class" of soldiers were these soft targets?
- 📝 Was Celtic society promiscuous?
- 📝 Why were so many female members of Hapsburg family named Maria something?
- 📝 What led Extremadurans to take a leading role in the conquest of Spain's territories in the Americas?
- 📝 Information about the Kingdom of Raja Dahir of Sindh?
- 📝 Did Britain bill Poland for maintaining Polish Air Force that fought over Britain?
- 📝 What are the social preconditions for division of labour, when compared in different emerging civilizations?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Why was the number of U.S. Representatives limited?
- 📝 Why was there a sharp decline in the number of municipalities in West Germany in the 1970s?
- 📝 Why did Hitler attack the Soviet Union when he was still busy fighting the United Kingdom?
- 📝 Why did archery not make a comeback when armor was phased out in the 18th century?
- 📝 Why was Poland spared from the Black Death?
- 📝 Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?
- 📝 Why was the Scout movement so successful?
- 📝 Why was the Council of Nicea held in Nicea rather than Rome or Constantinople?
- 📝 Why was World War I ended on Nov 11 11:00, rather than immediately upon signing the armistice?
- 📝 In the Soviet Union, why was the Cheka renamed so many times?
- 📝 Why was "leaping into the river" a valid trial outcome to prove one's innocence?
- 📝 Why was the Japanese Army's fatalities inflicted:suffered ratio so low in the Pacific theatre?
- 📝 Why was capturing the south of Okinawa necessary?
- 📝 Why were the drawings of Colossus burnt after WW2 and why was its very existence "of course" kept secret?
- 📝 Why was there a surge in the US incarceration rate during the 1990s?
- 📝 Why was the Treaty of Versailles so harsh?
- 📝 Was slavery in the United States legally limited to blacks?
- 📝 If the Ch’in dynasty was so short-lived, why was China named for it?
- 📝 Why was Switzerland not attacked during the two World Wars?
- 📝 Why was sugar cultivation more profitable in the Caribbean/Brazil than West Africa?
- 📝 Why was PTSD not written about as much before the 20th century?
- 📝 Why was Kaliningrad placed under the Russian SFSR rather than the Lithuanian SSR?
- 📝 Why was the Roman Empire considered an empire rather than a kingdom (again)?
- 📝 Why was the northern boundary of the Mongol empire set where it was?
- 📝 When and why was the samurai class abolished?
- 📝 Why was uranium mined in the 1500s, but only "discovered" in 1789?
- 📝 How and why was the boundary between West and East Berlin decided to be where it was?
- 📝 Why were troops with bayonets often effective against enemy cavalry even though the bayonet was a "secondary" weapon?
- 📝 Why was the bald eagle chosen as the national bird of the United States?
- 📝 Why was the US so pro-China and so anti-Japan before WW2?