How do historians know the details of a seemingly private event?
Upvote:7
Firstly, the author's intentions are important. If this book/movie/article/game is intended to be historical fiction (think Downton Abbey or Apocalypse Now), then the author/creator would have full license to create their own dialogue and events. Within reason, of course - such fictional works typically have to retain a certain level of authenticity in the dialogue and costumes.
If the book is intended as an academic study of an event or period in time, many authors these days choose to refrain from using apocryphal quotes. In cases where there is no verbatim (or reliable) record of a conversation or meeting, authors will often choose to discuss the intentions or outcomes of the meeting, rather than speculate on what each participant said.
In cases where someone has given exact quotes, you could always check their footnotes or endnotes (which a reliable book should have). There will often be references to the author's sources for these quotes, which will also help to give you a better idea of the reliability of the quote.
Upvote:11
This is why it is important to always keep the writer's intention in mind when studying some historical source. There are some different scenarios how that could happen:
- A contemporary writes down the conversation exactly as he heard it from the survivor. But we don't know how trustworthy that witness is. Obviously, most people will try to justify why they killed the other guy, and are tempted to paint him in a bad light.
- A contemporary writes down the conversation, but maybe he has reasons himself to fabricate it, too. Common scenario: After a successfull coup, most writers are too afraid to mess with the winner and will try to paint him in a good light, even without direct input from the guy. Or if two nations are at war, there is a good amount of propaganda flying around that is exaggerated for obvious reasons.
- A non-temporary writes down the conversation later. Maybe he tries to record the "general knowledge" about it that is still living within the populace (and might or might not be the truth at this point). Or worse, a lot of historical events we think to "know" were actually completely made up by fiction writers, and people started to forget about the "fiction" part after some centuries and took everything for a fact. Especially after the primary source gets lost.
In the end, you are right with your scepticism. Never assume that a conversation happened the exact way it was written down. We only have a chance to approximate truth by studying and comparing many different sources .. if several people with independent backgrounds (e.g. from different neighbouring cultures) agree on a thing, it might actually have happened that way. Maybe.
Upvote:29
The simple answer is that often the people involved write down (or verbally pass on information that is later written down by other people) these 'private communications' after the event, in memoirs, journals, letters, etc. Also 'official' secrets don't have to permanently stay secret, especially if the original reason for keeping them secret no longer applies, so 'private' correspondence and documents can be released to the public (and therefore to historians) once the need for secrecy is gone.
The issue of fabrication is a different one and opens up a wider discussion of intended and accidental bias in historical reporting. There's also the issue of (mis)interpretation if the original language of the parties in the conversation is different to the language used by the historian.
More post
- 📝 What's the Ancient Egyptian phrase/word for “Royal Road of Life”? And how would it have been spelt?
- 📝 How to find the population and mortality in London during the period 1760-1834?
- 📝 Origin/reason for reversed flag on right shoulder?
- 📝 Did the deity "Horus" pre-date "Horus-Aha"?
- 📝 Did medieval Europeans really walk around barefoot in winter?
- 📝 What is this medal that LBJ is wearing?
- 📝 How long would it take to travel from England to western Africa in the late 1890's?
- 📝 Why did Poland keep Warsaw as its capital instead of returning it to Krakow in the 20th century?
- 📝 What's the rationale for shipping coins back to Spain from its colonies?
- 📝 History of scientific regression
- 📝 Where can I find a blank outline of Silk Road routes?
- 📝 Was an Elector part of the Electoral College for purposes of a Reichstag, if he was the Emperor of the HRE?
- 📝 What colors were used as paint in the construction of the ziggurats in early Sumer?
- 📝 Why did Hitler not concentrate more on North Africa?
- 📝 How did conditions in Nazi labor camps and the Gulag compare?
- 📝 Why did American Abolitionists believe slavery to be immoral?
- 📝 What good came from the Great Leap Forward?
- 📝 Were Hitler's anti-Jewish sentiments known at all to those who voted him to power in 1933?
- 📝 How did Islam spread before the invention of the printing press?
- 📝 During internment, how effective was the US at identifying and detaining Japanese-Americans?
- 📝 Were conquered professionals used as forced professional labor under Nazi rule?
- 📝 Token status of the Mughal throne
- 📝 Was Celtic society promiscuous?
- 📝 Could a German insult Hitler without being arrested?
- 📝 Participation of Jewish Red Army Soldiers in Rape/Atrocities in Germany?
- 📝 How many cattle were slaughtered in Alta California?
- 📝 Which monarch had the longest break in their reign?
- 📝 Significance of division of Caledonia by Northumbrian Advance
- 📝 Did the British somehow imitate the Greek colonizers in India?
- 📝 Was Marie Antoinette considered a fully legitimate bride for the heir apparent to the French throne in 1770?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How do historians know the details of a seemingly private event?
- 📝 How do historians and linguists know how to pronounce the names from non-phonetic scripts?
- 📝 How did such a relatively minor event as the assassination of an archduke start World War I?
- 📝 How do we know the gender distribution of cave art painters?
- 📝 How significant was the Fall of Constantinople as an event leading to the Age of Exploration?
- 📝 Did the Ptolemaic Egyptians know how old the Pyramids were?
- 📝 How do we know that Louvre version of Mona Lisa painting is the original one painted by Leonardo Da Vinci?
- 📝 How did historians find out about the undoctored version of Stalin's doctored photographs?
- 📝 How does finding a Franklin ship change what we know about the expedition?
- 📝 How did the helmsman know what he was sailing towards with a big mast in his face?
- 📝 How did Lincoln know to stick with Grant before the completion of the Vicksburg campaign?
- 📝 What is "discovery" in the historical sense? How do historians today view and describe "discoveries"?
- 📝 How did Diego Gutiérrez know the boundaries (shape of the Americas) when he drew the 1562 Map of America
- 📝 How did Vasco da Gama know about the Southern Cross?
- 📝 How much did the western world know about the Soviet Union pre-WWII?
- 📝 How did Farragut know he could get his fleet through the Confederate line of "torpedos" at Mobile Bay?
- 📝 In the 19th century, do we know how armor changed with respect to guns of the time?
- 📝 How do we know the oldest New Testament manuscripts are copies?
- 📝 How do we know that the Tiwanaku Empire actually existed as an empire
- 📝 How do we know the patricians of Rome?
- 📝 How do historians agree on what common evidence should be used in the writing of history?
- 📝 How can I identify the uniform and other details in this picture of my great grandfather circa 1913?
- 📝 How did the HMAS Sydney know the real Straat Malakka's secret callsign, "IIKP", but not HSK Kormoran?
- 📝 How do we know the tonnages U-boats sank?
- 📝 How and when did the word "nuclear" replace the word "atomic"?
- 📝 How did Israel win the Six-Day War?
- 📝 How did the general population of England convert so smoothly to Protestantism?
- 📝 How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
- 📝 How did the Romans do division?
- 📝 How did 300,000 people survive the 3 1/2 year siege of Sarajevo?