Was "Blitzkrieg" at least partly intended for trapping the Jews?
score:5
I think the case of the French campaign in may/june 1940 conclusively answers this question in the negative. Indeed, Blitzkieg tactics designed to entrap the opposing armies were used systematically, with great efficiency and with great success during the whole period. After the armistice, the Reich annexed Alsace and Moselle, where Jews could be find in large number, if only because thousands of them had emigrated from Germany an Central Europe in the 1930s. So here is a clear-cut empirical test: the Reich had used Blitzkrieg tactics and had as a result thousands of entrapped Jews under its jurisdiction. What did it do?
It expropriated and expelled them to the unoccupied zone, thereby (of course involuntarily) actually ensuring that they would escape the harshest anti-semitic policies of the occupied zone for two years. More generally, the military history of the French campaign seems completely disconnected from the history of Jews persecution, deportation and extermination, with the first ending in mid-1940 and the second really picking-up steam only in spring 1941.
Based on these facts, I think it can be reasonably concluded that maneuver warfare on the western front had nothing to do with Jews extermination.
By way of reference: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histoire_des_Juifs_en_France#La_Seconde_Guerre_mondiale http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaboration_policière_sous_le_régime_de_Vichy http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lois_contre_les_Juifs_et_les_étrangers_pendant_le_régime_de_Vichy
These links show that the occupied zone had a much harsher treatment of Jews than the unoccupied zone (English versions accessible from the page, usually).
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wagner_(Gauleiter)
details the expulsion of Jews from annexed Alsace.
Upvote:10
First, the general consensus among historians is that there was no "Blitzkrieg"; the Wehrmacht incorporated some new technologies and tactics into what was basically a conventional military doctrine not dissimilar from that of other European powers. "Blitzkrieg" was invented by the newspapers, and fleshed out with fabricated details by post-war German generals who wanted to burnish their military credentials.
If we replace "blitzkrieg" with "large-scale offensive manoeuvre warfare," we have an answerable question, and the answer is clearly "no." We can say this for three reasons:
- We already have a perfectly adequate explanation of why Germany preferred large-scale offensive manoeuvre warfare: it was the only possible way to win. At every stage of the war from conception to termination, the Germans were severely disadvantaged in manpower and industrial capacity. German strength relative to its opponents' peaked around 1940 and thereafter began an accelerating decline. By Hitler's lights, then, it was far better to try for risky victories than accept an inevitable, protracted defeat.
- Having more Jews on their hands was exactly the opposite of what the Nazis wanted. They came around to a policy of mass murder not because they saw killing Jews as a positive end in itself (I mean, they probably did see it that way, but that wasn't the deciding factor.) Rather, they realized that sustaining the whole population of their empire was incompatible with pursuing a total war. If they were going to make a maximum effort, somebody had to starve, and given their ideology it wasn't hard to determine who the first victims would be. But it turns out to be surprisingly difficult to starve people, unless you can actually herd them into a particular area, fence it off, and guard it (as was done with the Soviet POWs.) But once you've gone that far, the logical next step...
- Most simply and boringly, there's no positive documentary evidence that I'm aware of for this idea.
Upvote:12
Don't think so. At all times, Nazi party seen Jews as a problem to be solved; they've seen them as people that shouldn't be in Greater Germany. In 1941, they didn't know what to do with Jewish citizens they already had; this was the time of ghettos and concentration camps, but Germans didn't yet consider extermination camps (like Chełmno, Bełżec, ...), nobody envisaged the Holocaust. I guess last thing they wanted is to capture even more Jewish people in 1941.
In fact I would investigate the opposite cause-effect relation: maybe capturing large numbers of Jews in the East later indirectly provided argument for the complete extermination, as opposed for example to alternative variants of internment/enslavement/expulsion?
UPDATE: By the way it came to my mind to check the numbers. True Wehrmacht could expect some 150.000 Jewish civilians there, but would they worry about them? I think they were much more worried about some 500.000 Soviet troops, armed and dangerous, which they have just being encircling when closing two pincers in Minsk.
More post
- 📝 Why did Robert E. Lee say that George McClellan was the best general he ever faced?
- 📝 Nothing is discovered until a white man finds out about it
- 📝 When did people first started to consider lead poisoning as a possible problem?
- 📝 Is there a good source for statistics of holocaust survivals?
- 📝 Post-war indictment of ex-Confederates in the Confederate States of America
- 📝 Did Napoleon ever say «On s'engage et puis… on voit»?
- 📝 Why did General Billy Mitchell regard war with Japan as inevitable as early as 1912?
- 📝 Why was John Paul Jones pardoned in Whitehaven in 1999?
- 📝 Who was this Roman General/figure of authority who, on his deathbed, named these two regrets?
- 📝 How were cities administered in the early Byzantine Empire?
- 📝 Why weren't aircraft carriers utilized during D-day?
- 📝 What are the oldest primary sources of recorded history in China?
- 📝 Why is Lady Jane Grey called Lady instead of Queen?
- 📝 How did Britain govern the thirteen colonies?
- 📝 Did Hitler get called a fascist by his opponents within Germany? Did he or other Nazis have a problem with that?
- 📝 Was Theodoric the Great killed by Justinian?
- 📝 How did coach service in 18th century America work?
- 📝 Why was Ruminawi not eligible to the throne?
- 📝 What were the largest companies in the world before and after the Great Depression?
- 📝 Did the Iraqis really only use landlines during Desert Storm?
- 📝 Why don't people without access to clean water drink beer anymore?
- 📝 What would have been the price of a loaf of bread in 1645 Amsterdam?
- 📝 What is the earliest evidence for the use of hearing aids?
- 📝 Why were the Marines so badly outnumbered at the critical point at Guadalcanal?
- 📝 Are there any examples of technologies have been lost over time?
- 📝 Which juridical reasons led the Netherlands to lose control of the seas?
- 📝 What's the rationale for shipping coins back to Spain from its colonies?
- 📝 What are the hay effigies in this Japanese movie?
- 📝 How was money transferred in early 1900s' Russia?
- 📝 Is there a definition of history separate from the definition of politics?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was "Blitzkrieg" at least partly intended for trapping the Jews?
- 📝 Was the Titanic tragedy at least partly avoidable?
- 📝 Why was the Halifax death penalty reserved for thefts of at least 13½ pence?
- 📝 During the breakup of the Soviet Union, on what basis was citizenship granted or withheld for each of the fifteen new republics?
- 📝 Was it militarily possible to "island hop" the Philippines if not for MacArthur?
- 📝 What was the reason for Soviet troops to withdraw from Yugoslavia in World War II?
- 📝 If the Ch’in dynasty was so short-lived, why was China named for it?
- 📝 Is there evidence to suggest the "war on drugs" was a cover for class warfare?
- 📝 What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?
- 📝 What was the economic basis for West Berlin?
- 📝 Was there a tax in the fifties for British citizens traveling abroad?
- 📝 Was it ever possible to join the US military instead of going to prison for a crime?
- 📝 What was the planned line of succession for the Nazi Party in the event that Hitler died?
- 📝 Was it possible for a young Japanese woman to end up enslaved in Great Britain in the mid-1600s?
- 📝 What was the 1970s name for skinny jeans?
- 📝 Who was responsible for the partition of India?
- 📝 Why was the area now known as Liberia chosen as the location for repatriation of African slaves in the US?
- 📝 Was Hiroshima targeted because its mountains would "rebound the explosion back into the city for more damage"?
- 📝 Was the title "Prince of Wales" originally claimed for the English crown prince via a trick?
- 📝 Was the "natural born citizen" requirement for the President inserted into the US Constitution by Alexander Hamilton's enemies?
- 📝 Was there a pre-determined arrangement for the division of Germany in case it surrendered before any Soviet forces entered its territory?
- 📝 Was the use of captured tanks an effective strategy for Germany?
- 📝 What was it like for a coastal village to experience a Viking raid in around the tenth century?
- 📝 What was the original process for becoming a US citizen?
- 📝 Was Islam really responsible for the Italian Renaissance?
- 📝 In the first half of 20th century, how was gold inspected for authenticity?
- 📝 Was the act of servicemen exchanging their weapons for enemy weapons common during WWII?
- 📝 What was the motivation for the Gregorian Calendar?
- 📝 How profitable was India for the British Empire in the 1800s?
- 📝 Was it ever illegal for two people of different religions to marry in the UK?