What was the role of the mountain ranges surrounding India in developing India's civilization?

score:5

Accepted answer

The Himalayas were a natural border against migrations, invasions and incursions,akin to a "wall" holding off invaders (from the Steppes). However, it is overrated insofar that it did not block all outside incursions (e.g. Alexander, the Hephthalites/White Huns, the Mughals), who mostly entered the subcontinent through the Khyber pass. The wall had holes.

Likewise, the Himalayas are overrated insofar as they did not block trade or stop cultural/religious influences going in or out of the subcontinent. The Indian Ocean traderoutes ("Monsoon Marketplace") connected the subcontinent with the Middle East, East Africa, Southeast Asia and China basically since the beginning of civilization. Buddhism spread across the Himalayas into China and Islam spread to India and (most likely) through India to Southeast Asia. There were Christian missions and Christians in India at least from the 4th century onwards.

So in essence, while the Himalayas shielded India to some degree, it was always connected with other countries and regions. Its culture, like most other cultures, is influenced by those regions and influenced those regions in return. My guess is that Basham is likely of the opinion that this is understated in traditional historiography.

Upvote:3

The general popular idea that the quote in question appears to be trying to counter is that the northern barrier of the Himalayas made the subcontinent nearly immune to invasion, and thus utterly cut off from the rest of the world. Particularly from powerful neighbors on the Asian steppe, who were militarily difficult to cope with until the invention of gunpowder.

Since the northern border was effectively militarily impassible (to non-Tibetans anyway) and the eastern largely jungle (which isn't much better), nearly all historical invasions of India came from the northwest (modern Afghanistan, which is also mountainous too), or in later years ship-borne carried by the monsoon winds.

It was in fact successfully invaded by the Mughals, and earlier by Indo-Iranian steppe people*. However, India didn't suffer invasion from the Huns that we know of, and is certainly better equipped with natural barriers than Europe, where the Huns got nearly to the coast of France before being pushed back. It successfully staved off invasions from both the Greek and the Mongol empires at the height of their powers.

So yeah, it wasn't totally isolated and impregnable, but it also wasn't nearly as vulnerable as China, the Near East, or eastern Europe.


* - We don't have a great historical record for this, so we don't know much about the nature of this movement, other than that it happened. Some people hotly push back on calling it an "invasion", either for that reason or for personal political reasons. So be careful about using "the I-word" in mixed company.

More post

Search Posts

Related post