Was Nikolai Bukharin told at trial his job was “to confess and repent, not to argue”?
score:2
The article you cite seems to mainly discuss a book, “The House of Government” by Yuri Slezkine. The quote you are looking for is from this book, page 736. There is a footnote, #47, which is an ibid to note 46. 46 says AMDNN, "Poloz" file, "Lichnoe delo No. 90365."
Upvote:7
Not quite. Indeed, in transcript of interrogation of Bukharin there is a phrase "There is no point in making a pious face, accused Bukharin. Better admit what exists" (pretty accurate translation from Russian), addressed to the accused, but context matters. This is not the first day of the trial, and previous day begins with Bukharin pleading guilty to several charges, including participation in secret organisation designed to overthrow Soviet government and partition USSR. At the end of the transcript from the March 6th, the following exchange appears (translation mine, sorry for any possible inaccuracies):
Vyshinsky: Then how did you came so easily to participation in a bloc involved in espionage work?
Bukharin: I know nothing about any espionage work.
Vyshinsky: And what did the bloc do?
Bukharin: We had here two statement about espionage - Sharangovich's and Ivanov's, two provocateurs.
Vyshinsky: Accused Bukharin, do you consider Rykov a provocateur?
Bukharin: No, I don't.
In the beginning of the next day, Alexei Rykov was called to testify, and from then on the interrogation is basically both accused trying to dodge questions about spywork, and prosecutor trying to catch them on technicalities. At one point, under pressure from interrogator, Rykov says that both he and Bukharin were involved in Polish espionage:
VYSHINSKY: The next paragraph of Rykov's reply, page 120, reads as follows: "Chervyakov developed exceptionally intensive work in Byelorussia in his relations with the Poles. He was connected with them in his illegal activities. He drew all the practical conclusions from these instructions of ours." Do you confirm this, Rykov?
Rykov: Of course.
VYSHINSKY: Consequently, Chervyakov and the people connected with you maintained systematic connections with the Poles?
Rykov: Yes.
VYSHINSKY: They were executing your instructions?
Rykov: Yes.
VYSHINSKY: Isn't this an espionage connection?
Rykov: No.
VYSHINSKY: What kind of connection is it?
Rykov: There was an espionage connection there, too.
VYSHINSKY: But was there an espionage connection maintained by a part of your organization with the Poles on your instructions?
Rykov: Of course.
VYSHINSKY: Espionage?
Rykov: Of course.
VYSHINSKY: Bukharin included?
Rykov: Of course.
VYSHINSKY: Were you and Bukharin connected?
Rykov: Absolutely.
VYSHINSKY: So you were spies?
Rykov: (No reply.)
VYSHINSKY: And the organizers of espionage?
Rykov: I am in no way better than a spy.
VYSHINSKY: You organized espionage, so you, were spies.
Rykov: It may be said, yes.
VYSHINSKY: It may be said, spies. I am asking, did you organize connections with the Polish intelligence service and the respcctive spy circles? Do you plead guilty to espionage?
Rykov: If it is a question of organization, then in this case, of course, I plead guilty.
After that, Bukharin again denies his involvement, and gets that phrase in response.
Sources:
Сталин И.В. Cочинения, Т. 16, М.: Издательство “Писатель”, 1997. С. 327–353 (Приложение XVI) (Interrogation of accused Bukharin, sessions on 6-7 March, Russian version)
Moscow Trials. The Case of Bukharin. Interrogation of accused Bukharin - Morning Session March 7 (thanks to sempaiscuba for finding this one), and Moscow Trials. The Case of Bukharin. Interrogation of accused Bukharin - Evening Session March 5. Source: “The Case of the Anti-Soviet Block of Rights and Trotskyites”, Red Star Press, 1973, page 369-439, 767-779; First published in English: “The Case of the Anti-Soviet Block of Rights and Trotskyites”, People’s Commisariat of Justice of the U.S.S.R., 1938; Online Version: Marxists Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2001;
More post
- 📝 What uncertainties and questions surround the death of Attila?
- 📝 Has there ever been a massacre or genocidal act via people thrown off a cliff?
- 📝 1959 Supersonic Transport Aircraft Committee (STAC) report (on Concorde)
- 📝 Why did Hitler send Manstein's army (and not some other) to Leningrad in the summer of 1942?
- 📝 What wars were there which were contemporaneous with but unconnected to ww2?
- 📝 How did the maximum strengths of alcoholic beverages in Western Europe increase from wine which Romans watered to 80 proof to absinthe?
- 📝 How have terms of English governance of Ireland been viewed in history?
- 📝 Where can I find a scan of the translated "De re militari" in Bulgarian?
- 📝 How were the British and French armies invited into Belgium in 1914?
- 📝 Why were air rifles not used more in combat?
- 📝 Is "Friends, Romans, ..." a historical speech?
- 📝 Why didn't the Arab states industrialize?
- 📝 Organisation of mercenaries
- 📝 Is there any evidence of post-landbridge travel across the Bering Strait?
- 📝 What was the population of the Roman Empire around 210 AD?
- 📝 What is an antimendicant?
- 📝 From what part(s) of Germany were the majority of Texas immigrants in the mid-19th century?
- 📝 How exactly were the titles of the Roman emperors passed on to their heirs
- 📝 Why were French maids apparently so common outside France?
- 📝 When a wattle-and-daub construction was demolished, how did they recycle or dispose of the materials?
- 📝 Micromanagement before the modern era?
- 📝 Did the King of Siam offer war elephants to the Union during the Civil War?
- 📝 What is the origin of the stereotype that Polish people lack intelligence?
- 📝 Why doesn’t Cuba's flag have any communist symbolism?
- 📝 What would be the problem if Turkey admits Armenian Massacre?
- 📝 How were middle ranking Nazis known to the allies before the end of the war?
- 📝 Who are the ancestors of the Israelites?
- 📝 What was the Soviet reasoning for developing their Airborne Forces (VDV) into a powerful military branch?
- 📝 Who is the oldest ruler whose remains can be positively identified?
- 📝 Was an Elector part of the Electoral College for purposes of a Reichstag, if he was the Emperor of the HRE?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Was Nikolai Bukharin told at trial his job was “to confess and repent, not to argue”?
- 📝 Why China was able to unify and not Europe?
- 📝 Why was gold so popular and valuable back when it did not have many real world uses?
- 📝 Why was 19th-century Japan able to modernize and not China?
- 📝 Why was slavery profitable in the Southern colonies and not New England?
- 📝 Why did Japan not withdraw from China as its pacific front was crumbling and the threat of US invasion imminent?
- 📝 Was the king of England able to execute a high rank noble and his family between 1216 and 1688?
- 📝 Which Roman general was killed by his own soldiers for not letting them to loot a newly conquered city?
- 📝 Why was Italy unified under the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia and not under a stronger state?
- 📝 How was Enguerrand VII de Coucy able to keep his allegiance to both king of England and France during the Hundred Years War?
- 📝 Why and how did George V give titles to his generals over lands that he did not possess?
- 📝 Was the Bosnian Crisis the trigger to WWI and not the assassination?
- 📝 Was oratory was considered Hitler's fundamental political strength by his contemporaneous friends and foes?
- 📝 What does this Italian soldier's 1930’s uniform tell us about his job and rank?
- 📝 Has there been a soldier who refused a direct illegal order and was not prosecuted for insubordination (post-1945)?
- 📝 Was there any Egyptian Pharaoh that was considered the one and only god that ancient Egyptians worshiped during his life?
- 📝 Was there a time when George Washington discovered some of his soldiers absolutely refused to swear loyalty and obedience to the Continental Congress?
- 📝 Why was James II and VII (same person), the last Roman Catholic monarch of Britain, not forced to convert to Anglicanism?
- 📝 What was the relationship between Ottoman emperor Murat IV and his mother Kosem Sultan?
- 📝 In Tolstoy's War and Peace, one character is captured after the Battle of Austerlitz and is taken as a POW. Was his experience historically accurate?
- 📝 Why was Lakhdar Boumediene, in the Boumediene v Bush case, acquitted of his charges? And, why was the habeas corpus not suspended?
- 📝 Is there evidence in Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel that supports his "due not to innate differences in the peoples" conclusion?
- 📝 Did Adolf Hitler ever address the fact that his own appearance was almost an exact opposite of what he considered the ideal Aryan appearance?
- 📝 Why did archery not make a comeback when armor was phased out in the 18th century?
- 📝 Why were old fortifications shaped like stars and not like circles?
- 📝 Why is the consensus that WW2 started on September 1, 1939 and not July 7, 1937?
- 📝 Is there any evidence to support the claim that the United States was "suckered into WW1" by Zionists, made by Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech?
- 📝 Why was Britain willing to return Hong Kong but not Gibraltar?
- 📝 Why did Britain and France not declare war against the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland in WW2?
- 📝 Was murdering a slave illegal in American slavery, and if so, what punishments were given for it?