Did Germans and Soviets count casualties differently at the Battle of Kursk?
Upvote:1
The 863K losses come from Krivosheyev's research. These are very precise numbers and unless one is a professional historian who did research in this specific field, he cannot objectively question these numbers. The research Krivosheyev did is monumental and acknowledeged worldwide (see Glantz). That precision is absolutely sufficient for discussions online.
Kursk defensive operation, 5.07.-23.07.1943
Divisions — 77, corps — 9, brigades — 14, Fortified Regions-3; Total manpower: 1.272.700.
Losses: irrecoverable - 70.330 (5,5 %), sanitary - 107.517, total - 177.847,
Operation «Kutuzov», 12.07.-18.08.1943
Divisions — 82, corps — 8, brigades —14, Fortified Regions-3; Total manpower: 1287600
Losses: irrecoverable - 112.529 (8,7 %), sanitary - 317.361, total - 429.890
Operation «Rumyantsev», 3.08.-23.08.1943
Divisions — 50, corps — 11, brigades — 5; Total manpower: 1144000.
Losses: irrecoverable - 71.611 (6,20 %), sanitary - 183.955, total - 255.566.
Total, 5.07.-23.08.1943
Divisions — 132, corps — 19, brigades — 19, Fortified Regions-3; Total manpower: 2431600.
Losses: irrecoverable - 254.470, sanitary - 608.833, total - 863.303
So 863.303 losses are total losses of all causes for all the armies involved in battle throughout the period, considered by the Russian historiography. Since Western historiography considers a smaller period of the operation, many, often willingly, try to compare German irrecoverable losses (this question is the case BTW) to Soviet total losses within different time slices. German losses often lack their allies, various collaborationists etc. Overmans claims that for July and August 1943 Germans have lost 130.429 men killed. If "killed" means it and is not "irrecoverable" loss, then this number should be even greater, since there are more wounded than killed usually. Higher Soviet casualties are explained, roughly speaking, by the following factors:
- general superiority of Germans in artillery: they had more high caliber guns, more barrage mass and were usually winning artillery duels. At Kursk, North part, the Soviets were expecting a stronger blow, so they amassed huge amounts of artillery there. This was the main reason the offensive went much harder for the Germans there. This however was not the case with the Southern part. Artillery is the most notable factor in losses.
- worse Soviet tanks and organization of tank forces at this stage. Up to half of tanks were T-60 and T-70. T-34s had an insanely tough time fighting German heavy tanks, should they encounter those. Elite German tank units were indeed better trained. However they were irreplaceable in all-in war realities.
- air superiority problems for the Soviets.
Upvote:4
First:
Is propaganda on either side a strong force for these numbers?
Yes, the table of causalties for Kursk is strictly debated because there was a lot of propaganda involved.
On the Soviet side: Contrary to Stalingrad for example, where a Soviet dead soldier could be given as a "victim" of Nazi's cruelty, defending civilians in a besieged city, the battle of Kursk is supposed to be a "military-only" fight on an open ground: some sort of duelling between two armies, with fair conditions (no winter is an important factor for Russian propaganda: winning Kursk means the Red Army won the war, and not general Winter).
On the German side: Same idea of duelling without winter, and you could add another factor: It could be seriously argued that Kursk was the last chance for Germany to win the war, so Soviets having very-very high losses could temper the fact that, at the end, Kursk is a Soviet victory because Axis attacks were repelled.
Second:
Do Germans and Soviets count casualties, particularly for their armor and wounded, very differently?
Yes. The count is different for armor because of multiple factors:
- Kursk, for the more restrictive part (German point of view), is only a matter of Axis attacks. During those attacks, German captured the ground on which they fought. So they always managed to get back the tanks and vehicles they had lost for minor damage, such as driving on a minefield. Those tanks were counted as damaged and not destroyed, so they do not enter the Casualties Table.
- Moreover, German repair teams were numerous and German heavy tanks were so armored that they could not be destroyed with one hit: they were always reparable
- However, those damaged vehicles needed time to be repaired: sometimes so much time that they did not enter the battle again before Hitler called off Operation "Zitadelle".
All of those factors are not applicable for Soviet armored vehicles.
In the end: Germans had few destroyed vehicles, but a lot of damaged ones. So much that came a time when they had no more forces to go on the attack, and the Soviets were counter-attacking. A lot of movements for German panzerdivision and their repair teams, associated with lost ground, led some difficult but reparable tanks to be destroyed.
Theses factors explain why very loopsided casulaty ratio in favor of the Germans is not really a lie, but is neither representative of the final situation.
More post
- 📝 Is the history of relations between Ukraine and Russia similar to what was between Ireland and Uk?
- 📝 Am I imagining this or did I just found one of the oldest "hidden" erotic artworks ever?
- 📝 Please help find these paintings
- 📝 Why did Jews have the support of the merchants in the push for Emancipation in England?
- 📝 When was the concept of "art criticism" first seen?
- 📝 Was Anti-Japaneseism a real political ideology?
- 📝 What was the alcoholic beverage of choice for British soldiers during WW2?
- 📝 What religions did Constantine convert to?
- 📝 How do archaeologists date cave paintings?
- 📝 Why didn't the Romans use the army to repel the siege of Rome in 410?
- 📝 What is the historical origin of the Jewish Sabbath?
- 📝 What is the first verified twin study?
- 📝 Why was Folke Bernadotte assassinated by Zionist Jews, when he had helped many Jews to escape holocaust?
- 📝 What does a slitterman do?
- 📝 How was the USA able to win naval battles in the Pacific?
- 📝 When did the US start using sniper + spotter teams, rather than solo snipers?
- 📝 What were the 52 kinds of victims persecuted by the Nazis?
- 📝 Were there regionalist/independentist movements or feelings in mid-19th century Spain?
- 📝 How were cattle cut out in the 19th century?
- 📝 How did news of important events spread during the English Civil War?
- 📝 Earliest Born Photographed Person
- 📝 When was it discovered that the stars are not all lying on the same plane?
- 📝 Can Bill Clinton run for president of France?
- 📝 Did the division between East and West Germany coincide with cultural boundaries?
- 📝 Tricolore: Why have the colors been chosen that way?
- 📝 In WW2, why did Germany sink allied supply convoys instead of capturing them?
- 📝 Why was a 10-year old kid appointed consul?
- 📝 Chronology of Political Party Alignment with "Left" and "Right"
- 📝 Which German cities does this article in The Economist allege that Britain destroyed?
- 📝 WWII - documents on turn around point in German Foreign strategy - "stop we are not going to pass Finland to USSR"
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Did Germans and Soviets count casualties differently at the Battle of Kursk?
- 📝 Did the U.S. and Soviet Union have a submarine battle in 1968?
- 📝 Why did the Germans not encircle and besiege Stalingrad?
- 📝 Did the Germans use the V1 and V2 missile system on the Eastern Front in World War 2?
- 📝 Why did few French and no Dutch pilots (but many Poles and Czechs) take part in the Battle of Britain?
- 📝 Why did the Germans build battle cruisers with a different profile than the British?
- 📝 Why did England and Portugal cheap out on the Battle of Aljubarrota?
- 📝 Where and how did the allies scrounge enough food for the Soviets AND the British?
- 📝 Did the U.S. actively encourage discord between the Soviets and Chinese?
- 📝 Why did the expelled Sudeten Germans and Danube Germans go to Germany, as opposed to Austria?
- 📝 What was the first instance of native Americans using gunpowder weapons in battle and did they ever make their own powder?
- 📝 What were Helfrich's orders for Doorman in 1942 prior to the Battle of the Java Sea, and did he comment on these in later life?
- 📝 Did the Germans "mix up" Army Groups A and B during Fall Blau?
- 📝 Why and how did some Germans choose to join the Stasi (Staatssicherheit)?
- 📝 How did messages get back and forth between ship and shore during the Battle of Cherbourg?
- 📝 Did the Balkans campaign delay Operation Barbarossa for the Nazis and was it therefore an important reason why they lost against the Soviets in WWII?
- 📝 What were the casualties and ship damage on each side of the Battle of Plum Point Bend, Tennessee?
- 📝 What did the Germans believe were the causes of WWI during the war and after?
- 📝 Did the discovery of zero affect our calendar and how we count days? Are we off by a tenth?
- 📝 How and when did the word "nuclear" replace the word "atomic"?
- 📝 Why did the Germans spare Allied troops trapped at Dunkirk?
- 📝 Why did Britain and France not declare war against the Soviet Union when it invaded Poland in WW2?
- 📝 How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
- 📝 Why did LBJ, a staunch segregationist, champion and sign the 1964 Civil Rights Bill?
- 📝 When and how did the USA and the UK become allies?
- 📝 Did the Soviets excel in one area of weaponry during World War II?
- 📝 Why did the Germans use the Enigma machine rather than the far superior "Lorenz" cipher machine?
- 📝 Did the leaflets from the US to Hiroshima/Nagasaki civilians on bombing cities reduce the civilian casualties of the two nuclear bombs in August 1945?
- 📝 How did the ancient Romans count with their fingers?
- 📝 When did the practice of formally "declaring war" cease and why?