How to interpret C.S. Lewis's use of magic by good moral agents in the Chronicles of Narnia to be acceptable to earth Christians?
score:3
Anyone who believes that C.S. Lewis was anything other than one of the most sincere and completely devoted Christians of the 20th century must have no idea about his reputation as a Christian apologist. To be clear, the Chronicles were intended for CHILDREN and were written to appeal to the sensibilities and intellectual development of CHILDREN. While I think CSL wrote the Chronicles for anyone under the age of about 16, some of us who read these books over and over tend to put too much thought into what he was trying to convey with his symbolism and imagery. Sometimes, he was just trying to get kids to think about their place as people in a world created by God.
By using references to magic, talking animals, knights, and dragons, Lewis was merely trying to appeal to the sense of fantasy that most young kids have naturally. He never suggested or implied that magic was an alternative to being a good, moral person; or that one should seek wealth and success over their relationships with others. In fact, in almost every example I can think of, those characters who rely upon magic to obtain their desires always end up losing them. Only those characters who are willing to sacrifice their own safety, comfort, and reputations can eventually see Aslan. And those who cannot see Aslan cannot enjoy the blessings of his presence.
I think CSL was trying to get across that Jesus expects us to come to Him as children; that is, without any preconceived notions about what is possible. To be a Christian, it is necessary to first accept that the supernatural has dominion over the natural world. If we are willing to believe in magic, then we should be more than willing to believe in God. CSL once wrote that those who practice Paganism are much closer to Christians than Atheists or Agnostics.
So while his images might seem pagan, his intent was to inspire children to seek the supernatural; and consider that without the supernatural, there can be no nature. This was a self-evident proposition for him, but he explained it very well in numerous essays and in his most famous work on the subject. I think Narnia is just an extension of this idea that a belief in God begins with a belief in something other than a corporeal existence. He used magic to cultivate this belief and to inspire curiosity among children about what their true roles on Earth might be.
It was also just a set of really neat books for kids to read that disguised Christian ethics as fairy tales. Thank God for C.S. Lewis and the Chronicles of Narnia.
As for the comment about CSL's and JRR Tolkien's works being somehow un-Christian, clearly the commenter has not read either author very much. If you do just a little research you will find that JRRT was another Christian who tried to do the same thing for adults (among his many other intentions) with the Lord of the Rings. Although Narnia was not as linguistically rich or as complete of a work as the Rings, both authors should be read by Christians because they convey mind-opening truths about strength of character and powers greater than self-interest that can't be absorbed through a sermon or even a philosophy class.
Upvote:2
How to interpret C.S. Lewis's use of magic by good moral agents in the Chronicles of Narnia to be acceptable to earth Christians?
Magic is not a new subject matter in Christian fiction. It is one that seems to come to the forefront more often in modern times due to such books as The Lord of the Rings and C. S. Lewis’ The Chronicle of Narnia tales.
Magic included in Christian fiction is not new. I can remember reading such books when I was quite young. Some were several hundred years old. In fact, they were generally written not so much to promote the use of magic, but rather to make some Christian moral teaching or doctrine come to light. Besides real magical spells were never given. After all, it is simply Christian fiction.
The use of real spells has no use in Christian fiction and neither Tolkien or Lewis employed it. They are both great Christian writers!
C.S. Lewis was a brilliant Christian writer and knew how to make the imaginary come alive. We call this simply Christian fantasy which can allow an author, like Lewis to model his story around the essence of the moral life between good and evil.
“So why bother putting magic in stories at all?” someone might ask. “If magic can be an issue, why shouldn’t a Christian writer leave it out of stories altogether?” I’d say there are three basic reasons to work out a means to include magic in stories: 1) Fantasy is a popular genre with loads of readers. It makes sense to desire to reach them within their genre expectations from a strictly analytical point of view. Not to mention it can inherently interesting to write fantasy for people who’ve read it–and fantasy normally contains magic. 2) Fantasy has the ability to use analogy or allegory or myth-making to create powerful messages about the world we live in. And what the story calls “magic” can be a key part of any such analogy. C.S. Lewis achieved using the word “magic” that way in the Chronicles of Narnia, in fact. 3) And it so happens to be that magic is a staple of fantasy as much as aliens are a staple of science fiction. You could write the one without including the other, but it would not really represent the genre well for the most part. Or be as interesting. - Seven Ways to Deal With the Problem Magic Poses Christian Fantasy Writers
Lewis was a great Christian fiction author.
In his Chronicles of Narnia, Lewis makes it clear that the source and creation of all life is Jesus Christ, symbolized by the Great Lion, Aslan. And Aslan tells the children who come into Narnia from our world that they were there because He has called them; and that they will know Him in their own world, too – only “by another name.” It takes a very dense reader not to know that this other name is Jesus.
This is what Lewis gets right. In all seven Narnia books, the theme is getting to know Christ. For the most part, this is accomplished through obedience and love. This is a very big thing to get right. - After Lewis and Tolkien
Aslanin the 2005 film The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.
Magic or no magic The Chronicles of Narnia is full of Christian themes and imagery.
In one of his last letters, Lewis wrote, "Since Narnia is a world of Talking Beasts, I thought He [Christ] would become a Talking Beast there, as He became a man here. I pictured Him becoming a lion there because (a) the lion is supposed to be the king of beasts; (b) Christ is called "The Lion of Judah" in the Bible; (c) I'd been having strange dreams about lions when I began writing the work."
The similarity between the death and resurrection of Aslan and the death and resurrection of Jesus has been noted; one author has noted that like Jesus, Aslan was ridiculed before his death, mourned, and then discovered to be absent from the place where his body had been laid. - Aslan
Upvote:2
We have seen that when we try to justify something, that means it tends to be wrong. When we excuse magic in other shows, movies, books, and games, this shows we are trying to justify magic, this thinking is wrong because God's word is very clear about those who practice sorcery (magic) or "tolerate (accept) Jeezbul" who sacrificed children, worshipped and performed witchcraft (magic) before idols.
Whether it's fictional or nonfiction, we are shaped by the content we take in and when we begin to agree with the material of the content it can change how we look at life. We become desensitized to magic, and we will look no different than the World that agrees with this stuff.
I know this because I use to be a huge LOTR, HP, and LOZ fan for 15 years! But when I looked objectively through the lens of scripture and allowed His Word to change me, I realized to please God and to have a proper relationship with my Savior I needed to get rid of the junk that was distracting/separating me from Him. I did not want to be honest, I just wanted to keep living the way I was yet something needed to change, I knew it was wrong by what God's word said and we can even see in the Book of Acts of those who when they rejected their magical practices they burned their magic scrolls. It wasn't an easy task, the scrolls were not cheap and I did the same with the magic in my life. Get rid of it! I don't care if the author or the content has "Christian values" or "story" but that it's encouraging the truth and to do what's right by the Bible's standard.
I'm sorry, C.S. Lewis & J.R. Tolkien books are not good books through the lens of scripture so I would recommend as Believers to stop promoting or reading such books, hopefully, other books as well so Believers stop encouraging magic and false gods to be normalized in our society. That is all.
Upvote:3
In Narnia, magic is used to represent the non-human power that God has, and Aslan himself is seen to be powerful. For example, in the Bible, prophets have non-human abilities but it is seen as spiritual gifts rather than evil magic, because it was given to them by God.
In the Bible, magic often refers to people who use spiritual power for their own gain, to prophesy against God's will or to harm others (this is where Jadis the White Witch represents Satan - she has power which is in opposition to Aslan's good power).
Upvote:7
In the real world, there is no fairy tale magic. (Devotees of Harry Potter, take note.) If you see something "magical", you're either seeing (1) a fraud, (2) a marvel of technology, (3) a holy miracle of God, or (4) some kind of demonic action.
The Bible and the Church forbid "sorcery" and "witchcraft" because those words literally refer to that practice (#4) of trying to obtain supernatural power through devil-worship. We can say that these practices are morally wrong, and that you should not go to fortune tellers and witch doctors, without having to accept the premise that they actually work -- they probably don't. But if they do, demons are involved.
That's not to say that miracles of God don't happen in our lives. I'm sure they do, but I have a hunch they are recognizably different from sorcery and witchcraft, so you wouldn't mistake the two.
On the other hand, in a fairy tale, there is such a thing as fairy tale magic. That kind of magic, in those fictional worlds, does not come as a result of devil-worship. You can think of it as a kind of marvellous technology that works on Narnian laws of physics. For that reason, it's not a sin for Narnians to use benign magic for good. Nor is it a sin for Harry Potter or Merlin or your kid's favorite Disney character to use fairy-tale magic. The risk of sin is that someone in the real world might mistake fantasy for reality and make moral compromises to try to obtain supernatural power here.
More post
- 📝 How do Trinitarians who argue the 'ego eimi' at John 8:58 ought to be translated 'I AM' explain the lack of reactions to the same phrase?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses explain Paul's apparent equating of Yahweh and Jesus in Romans 10?
- 📝 According to the wider hope/inclusive framework, why does the church still exist?
- 📝 How do Catholics justify confessing to a priest?
- 📝 What is the full meaning of Mathew 24:36-51 from a view of Methodists or Baptist
- 📝 How have Christians who affirm traditional sin doctrines handled 'pathological' guilt in their preaching?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for believing in the Book of Mormon?
- 📝 Is the use of rosary by Catholics a pagan practice?
- 📝 Why do Mormons use Trinitarian language in baptism when they explicitly reject Trinitarianism?
- 📝 On what basis do some Protestants believe the angel of the Lord is the pre-incarnate Jesus Christ?
- 📝 Beatification/canonization process in Eastern Orthodox Church
- 📝 Do any Christian denominations or groups teach about Satan's common tactics to pierce through the spiritual armor of a Christian?
- 📝 According to LDS, is the Apostle Paul wrong that remaining unmarried is spiritually better than being married?
- 📝 How do Catholics defend the apparent errors found in the deuterocanonical books?
- 📝 Persecution of Jewish people by Christians in Middle Ages?
- 📝 Identifying a source for this C S Lewis quote (reflecting St Augustine and St Paul)
- 📝 Which nuns get new names?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for All Saint's Day?
- 📝 David and Milkom wore a 75 lb crown, wouldn't that have snapped their necks?
- 📝 What's the main logical basis that is put forth by those Christians who don't believe in the existence of God?
- 📝 Are Jehovah's Witnesses Protestants?
- 📝 What exactly is Peter's connection to Rome according to Catholic dogma?
- 📝 If God cannot tempt anyone, what is the meaning of the following scriptures?
- 📝 According to Protestants who hold that belief in Trinitarianism is necessary for salvation, what happens to those who assent but don't understand?
- 📝 Has the notion of "legitimacy" been abandoned in the Catholic Church?
- 📝 Indication of the possibility to discern the spirit of a man by/without listening to his words
- 📝 Parish Priests Who Have been Canonized in the Catholic Church?
- 📝 Is the Fatima prophecy still relevant in the 21st century?
- 📝 What, historically, was the stance of the Catholic Church about the duty to obey non-Christian governments?
- 📝 What did kids of polygamous Mormon parents call their half-sibling's moms?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 How to interpret C.S. Lewis's use of magic by good moral agents in the Chronicles of Narnia to be acceptable to earth Christians?
- 📝 How do Mormons interpret the warning in Revelation about adding to the book?
- 📝 How can I tell the difference between the Moral law and other laws in the old testament?
- 📝 Did the early Church Fathers have a complete agreement on how to interpret 1 Peter 3:18-20?
- 📝 How do Protestants interpret "baptized for the dead" in 1 Corinthians 15:29?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 6:19-21 and Luke 6:20-26?
- 📝 How do proponents of the Prosperity Gospel interpret Matthew 19:24?
- 📝 How is the 'New Perspective on Paul' different from Catholicism with respect to good works?
- 📝 How do Christians that do not believe in inerrancy interpret the Bible?
- 📝 How do Jehovah's Witnesses interpret verses like Isaiah 9:6 which call the messiah 'God'?
- 📝 How do Anglicans interpret the great crowd (144,000) of Revelation 7?
- 📝 How best for a Christian to explore the ethics of a Covid-19 vaccine that might use farmed cell-lines from aborted foetuses?
- 📝 How do the LDS interpret Matthew 19:12?
- 📝 How did Swedenborg interpret 1 John 2:2: "He is the propitiation for our sins"?
- 📝 How does spiritual maturity affect our hermeneutic (how we interpret the Bible)?
- 📝 How do paedo-baptists interpret the Great Commission?
- 📝 How do those who believe the Son is not Almighty God interpret Revelation 2:23?
- 📝 How do Trinitarians explain the almost exclusive use of singular pronouns to refer to God in the Bible?
- 📝 How do adherents to the maxim "clearer passages interpret less clear ones" handle cases where two sets of "clear" passages contradict each other?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church interpret Matthew 23:9 so as to normalize priests being called Father?
- 📝 What major views are there on the question of whether God shares moral responsibility for our deeds, good and bad?
- 📝 How do the Eastern Orthodox interpret this verse from Psalm 69:3?
- 📝 How does the Roman Catholic Church interpret predestination?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church respond to the claim that its authority to interpret scripture is based on circular reasoning?
- 📝 How does a full preterist interpret the 'Thousand-years reign' in Revelation 20
- 📝 How do Calvinists interpret Acts 7:51 in light of the doctrine of 'irresistible grace?'
- 📝 How do those who interpret John 10:30 as a claim to full divine equality by Jesus also interpret John 10:29, which says the Father is greater?
- 📝 What is the Catholic biblical or canon basis saying some moral works without grace (transient or permanent) are good (or not have the nature of sin)?
- 📝 How do Old Earth Creationists use 2 Peter 3:8 to support the "day-age" theory?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church explain passages that seem to use culturally specific logic?