Upvote:1
The study of Christianity includes the study of Judaism to some extent, which in itself de facto is another religion, so I think that answers your first question.
As for Buddhism, gods are considered irrelevant in the practice of meditation to attain Nirvana (lit. "blowing out", that is, to perceive the world without preconceptions). It is considered a method, a tool to reach this goal. Buddhism invites inquiry & study on basic principles that are to some extent compatible with the scientific method. The Kalama Sutra for example states:
Those tenets are similar to those of scientific inquiry. Prominent Buddhist figures, like the Dalai Lama, have stated repeatedly in the last half century that "if there is conflict between Buddhist doctrine and science, science wins".
If you want to do this kind of study, I have some recommendations from my comparative philology studies I hope you will consider:
Upvote:2
God told Adam that to 'eat' of the tree of knowledge of good and evil was wrong and was deadly :
...of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou dost not eat of it, for in the day of thine eating of it -- dying thou dost die. [Young's Literal Translation of Genesis 2:17]
The serpentine spirit later misrepresented those words :
... of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden God hath said, Ye do not eat of it, nor touch it, lest ye die. [Young's Literal Translation of Genesis 3:3]
It is neither forbidden nor fatal to 'touch' the knowledge of good and evil, that is to say to reach out and handle the knowledge of what is good and what is evil.
But it is catastrophically fatal to partake of such things - as a means of sustaining life, as a means of imbibing into oneself something in order to maintain life.
Great care must be taken in handling such things. One must realise that to 'eat' of them is absolutely dangerous and deadly.
But yes, they can be 'touched'.
Personally, I prefer not to, unless it is very necessary.