Does the Minimal Facts Argument have the potential to the biggest Christian revelation over the last thousand years?
Upvote:2
Although I admit I hadn't heard of Habermas prior to this question, it can't be denied that he is an important figure in Apologetics, as evidenced by him being in the top 14 authors by number of index references in Groothuis's textbook Christian Apologetics.
The Minimal Facts Argument (MFA) does not exist in isolation. It is a specific form of apologetic argument in the broader approach of Evidential Apologetics. Habermas is not the only proponent of this approach, and though I don't know who first developed it as a distinct approach to apologetics, Habermas is the youngest of the proponents listed in Wikipedia, making me think it's pretty unlikely that he was its founder.
Evidential Apologetics itself is really a development of so-called Classical Apologetics. Groothuis explains their relationship as follows: Classical Apologetics has a two-step strategy: arguing first for a monotheistic God, and then for the particulars of Christianity, focusing on miracles, the incarnation, and the death and resurrection of Jesus. Evidentialism has a one-step strategy, jumping straight to the argument of the historicity of Christ and the resurrection, its proponents arguing that the fact of the resurrection is enough to bring someone directly from atheism to faith in Christ, without needing to be convinced of theism first.
It is natural for Christian apologists to give a heavy focus to the death and resurrection of Jesus - it is the centre of our gospel of course! More than that, it seems to me that the MFA is really just a particular formulation of another common argument, often called the Transformation of the Disciples. Two popular pop-level apologetics books, Josh McDowell's Evidence Demands a Verdict and Lee Strobel's The Case for Christ each include it as part of their Cumulative approach to apologetics. McDowell quotes none other than John Stott saying "Perhaps the transformation of the disciples of Jesus is the greatest evidence of all for the resurrection", and Strobel interviewed J. P. Moreland who says that his first line of evidence for the resurrection is the transformation of the disciples.
Furthermore, it is also quite common for apologists to present first the extra-Biblical evidences for Jesus. Though many have written on these topics, few do it as well as John Dickson's The Christ Files, which considers in order the secular Greco-Roman sources about Jesus, then the hostile witness of Jewish sources, before finally considering the Christian witness.
In summary, The Minimal Facts Argument is unlikely to be revolutionary within Christianity because it is far from a revolutionary argument. The ideas it conveys are actually well recognised and are given a place of top importance by many apologists. (For this reason I'm highly doubtful that you can attribute the change within secular academia of almost universal acknowledgement of the historicity of Jesus to the MFA.) The MFA is one way of building an argument on these facts, but it is not the only way to do so. And because most apologists do not subscribe to the Evidentialist approach, I think the specific form of MFA may end up being overlooked compared to those who present the very similar Transformation of the Disciples argument within a Cumulative approach.
More post
- 📝 Mt. 18:5 or 19:14 to argue against contraception?
- 📝 What is an overview of beliefs on how one can become demon-possessed?
- 📝 Those who enjoy pain: where do they go [according to Catholicism]
- 📝 How were the books of the New Testament chosen?
- 📝 Did any other church father other than St. Augustine believe in the just war theory?
- 📝 In the Latin Catholic Church, would clerics administer the last rites if the sick person's illness is contagious and deadly?
- 📝 Why is the Nation of Israel called Israel and not Abraham?
- 📝 Who are the leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses church?
- 📝 What does this possibly Catholic symbol mean?
- 📝 If an asteroid obliterated Planet Earth, could that be interpreted as God's "Second Flood"?
- 📝 Could a lowborn during the middle ages read the bible?
- 📝 What is the biblical evidence against a pre-incarnate Jesus?
- 📝 Was Mary given a glorified or "spiritual body" like the resurrected body of Jesus while on earth?
- 📝 Do Jehovah's Witnesses have one Saviour or Two?
- 📝 Counterarguments to "Numerology"?
- 📝 Authentic reasons to leave Roman Catholicism?
- 📝 Communion of Saints and Our Relationships in Heaven
- 📝 Why doesn't the Gospel of Peter, who was given the keys to the kingdom of heaven, lead the new testament?
- 📝 According to Aquinas, does "love" towards something always bring "desire" towards that something?
- 📝 Latin Lyrics for Gregorian Chants
- 📝 How many hand written Vulgate manuscripts were accessible?
- 📝 Female Sunday School teachers for 17, 18 year old male students?
- 📝 How does the Catholic Church explain passages that seem to use culturally specific logic?
- 📝 How do opponents respond to the Grace Gambit?
- 📝 When an offense has been committed, is it OK to talk to the other person through an intermediary or should it be direct?
- 📝 Sunday or Saturday?
- 📝 Why did the Jews comment that Jesus was not yet fifty years of age?
- 📝 How do Christians who believe in libertarian free will explain the large imbalance in the ratio of people saved vs. condemned?
- 📝 Do we know which sea Jesus calmed?
- 📝 According to the Bible, how should Christian clergy be compensated for their services?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Does the Minimal Facts Argument have the potential to the biggest Christian revelation over the last thousand years?
- 📝 Does the Christian Old Testament have the exact same list of books as the Jewish Bible?
- 📝 Does a Christian have enemies outside of the world, the flesh, and the devil?
- 📝 Must a Christian disagree with Bernard Williams and say the concept of truth does have a history?
- 📝 What biblical (scriptural) basis does a Christian have to command the blessings?
- 📝 Does the Christian church have an official position on Beauty?
- 📝 Is the Christian Religion based on "Faith in Faith" or does it have a foundation of "Acceptance of Facts"?
- 📝 Have any prominent Christian Intelligent Design proponents discussed the issue of a potential infinite regress of intelligent designers?
- 📝 Does the triune God have will by nature, or by persons?
- 📝 Does "Mere Christianity" represent the core of Christian belief?
- 📝 What evidence do we have today about Christian groups not represented at the first four ecumenical councils?
- 📝 Why does the Messiah have to be God?
- 📝 Does Catholic doctrine teach that the Incarnation would have taken place regardless of Adam's decision?
- 📝 What doctrine does Family Radio have of the End of the World?
- 📝 How have mainstream Christian denominations interpreted the Acts command to abstain from blood?
- 📝 If I am a Christian does this mean I need to support the modern state of Israel?
- 📝 Does the Bible make a distinction between Christian and secular love?
- 📝 Where does the Catholic tradition that Mary did not have pain giving birth to Jesus come from?
- 📝 Does the priest have the power to forgive sins?
- 📝 Why does a beheaded saint have the halo above the stump?
- 📝 Does the Pope's encyclical Laudato si' have a Latin version?
- 📝 What does it mean that John's Gospel does not have an account of the institution of the Eucharist?
- 📝 According to Reformed theology, why does God tell people to repent if they don't have the choice to do so, as in Exodus 10:3?
- 📝 Why does Jesus have to be fully God and fully man? Is it not sufficient to be the son of God and fully man?
- 📝 How does Swedenborgianism understand Amos 3:2, "You only have I known of all the families of the earth"?
- 📝 Does a Christian have a responsibility to participate in government?
- 📝 Does the parable of the Unforgiving Servant have implications re: "once saved, always saved"?
- 📝 Does the Catholic Church have a contingency plan for the case that the pope and all cardinals are dead?
- 📝 How does the New Testament define a Christian and a non-Christian, a brother in Christ and not a brother in Christ?
- 📝 According to Catholic doctrine, what effect does the Last Judgment have on those who are already in heaven?