What is truly meant when it is said that Holy Scripture is 'inerrant' according to the Catholic Church?
score:4
According to the Catholic Catechism,
we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures.
This statement is purposely ambiguous, as there is debate among Catholic theologians about what inerrancy entails. By saying the text is inerrant on matters God desired to communicate for our salvation, it opens up the possibility that the text contains incidental details that are not inerrant. However, the ambiguity also allows that it is possible all details are also correct. It just depends on what God chose to do, which humans can't know for sure.
- Catholics United is a good example of a more strict interpretation within the Catholic Church:
Some have taught that the Scripture’s inerrancy is restricted only to “religious matters,” arguing that the Bible is without error only when it deals with matters of faith and morals. However, when it comes to non-religious matters of history or “background details,” these critics argue that God may have permitted human errors to exist alongside more important religious truths.
But this position has been refuted repeatedly by the Church because it necessarily limits God’s inspiration of the sacred texts.
...
When it comes to matters of natural science, the Church teaches that the sacred authors did not necessarily intend to teach physics, astronomy, or chemistry. For example, when the Scriptures describe the sun as moving around the earth (cf. Ps. 19: 4-6; Eccles. 1:5), the sacred writer was not intending to give astronomy lessons. A literalistic approach would have to deny the modern scientific data showing that the earth revolves around the sun.
However, the writers were intending to report what appeared to their senses, and did so accurately.
- While David Bennett offers a good defense of a less strict interpretation:
The early Fathers held that the Bible was inerrant... However, this is the case only when the Bible is properly understood, interpreted by the Church. This is inerrancy by ancient standards and not modern, fundamentalist standards. The early Fathers did not think that minor contradictions rendered the Bible errant, nor did they insist all stories were meant to be interpreted literally. For instance, the creation stories were often allegorized, interpreted in ways so as to prefigure Christ, or interpreted through the lens of the science of the day (or all three!). Thus St. Augustine could say each day in the Genesis creation story was equal to a thousand years, or that the science of the day should shape our understanding of the creation stories, without ever denying the divine inspiration of the Scriptures.
...
Thus the view of the early Church is that the Bible is an accurate, God-inspired testimony, the written document accurately reporting the foundations of the faith, but not necessarily inerrant as defined by modern criteria, and the Old Testament is certainly not inerrant when exclusively interpreted literally.
...
In conclusion, Catholics believe that the Bible is God-inspired, inerrant when interpreted correctly by the Church (and this is fluid to a degree, as science and other observations help us with this task), but not necessarily inerrant by the Protestant definition.
Upvote:0
[Bl. Pope] Pius IX, condemned the following notion: “The prophecies and miracles set forth and recorded in the Sacred Scriptures are the fiction of poets, and the mysteries of the Christian faith the result of philosophical investigations. In the books of the Old and the New Testament there are contained mythical inventions...”37
Pope Leo XIII: “It is absolutely wrong and forbidden either to narrow inspiration to certain parts only of Sacred Scripture or to admit that the sacred writer has erred.”38
Pope Pius X, condemned the notion: “Divine inspiration does not extend to all of Sacred Scriptures so that it renders its parts, each and every one, free from every error.”39
Pope Benedict XV: “...the divine inspiration extends to all parts of Scripture without distinction, and that no error could occur in the inspired text.”40
Pope Pius XII, repeats Leo XIII decree: “It is absolutely wrong and forbidden either to narrow inspiration to certain parts only of Sacred Scripture or to admit that the sacred writer has erred.”41
Pope Pius XII, condemns the notion: “...immunity from error extends only to those parts of the Bible that treat of God or of moral and religious matters.”42
1964 Pontifical Biblical Commission: “...that the Gospels were written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, who preserved their authors from every error.”
1998 Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: “...the absence of error in the inspired sacred texts...”43
Pope Leo XIII: “For the sacred Scripture is not like other books. Dictated by the Holy Spirit, it contains things of the deepest importance, which, in many instances, are most difficult andobscure....For all the books in their entirety...with all their parts, have been written under the dictation of the Holy Spirit.”44
Council of Trent: “...the purity itself of the Gospel is preserved in the Church, which promised before through the Prophets in the Holy Scriptures...and [the Synod] clearly perceiving that this truth and instruction are contained in the written books and in the unwritten traditions, which have been received by the apostles from the mouth of Christ Himself, or from the apostles themselves, at the dictation of the Holy Spirit, have come down even to us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand, [the Synod] following the examples of the orthodox Fathers, receives and holds in veneration with an equal affection of piety and reverence all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament, since one God is the author or both, and also the traditions themselves, those that appertain both to faith and to morals, as having been dictated either by Christ's own word of mouth, or by the Holy Spirit, and preserved in the Catholic Church by a continuous succession”.”45
Vatican Council 1: “If anyone shall not accept the entire books of Sacred Scripture with all their divisions, just as the sacred Synod of Trent has enumerated them, as canonical and sacred, or denies that they have been inspired by God: let him be anathema.” [source]
1994 Catechism of the Catholic Church: “Sacred Scripture is the speech of God as it is put down in writing under the breath of the Holy Spirit.” .... “God inspired the human authors of the sacred books...it was as true authors that they consigned to writing whatever he wanted written, and no more.”46
Pope Leo XIII: “It is futile to argue that the Holy Spirit took human beings as his instruments in writing, implying that some error could slip in...For by his supernatural power he so stimulated and moved them to write, and so assisted them while they were writing, that they properly conceived in their mind, wished to write down faithfully, and expressed aptly with infallible truth all those things, and only those things, which He himself ordered; otherwise He could not Himself be the author of the whole of Sacred Scripture.”47
Code of Canon Law (1983): “Even after ordination to the priesthood, clerics are to pursue sacred studies and are to strive after that solid doctrine founded in sacred scripture, handed on by their predecessors, and commonly accepted by the Church, as set out especially in the documents of councils and of the Roman Pontiffs. They are to avoid profane novelties and pseudo-science.48
Quotes collected from pp. 28-38 of Galileo Was Wrong: The Church Was Right (vol. 3: The Evidence from Church History)
Notes:
More post
- 📝 How does sola fide doctrine reconcile with how much David talks about his own righteousness?
- 📝 According to Trinitarians, does Tuggy get Jesus' argument at John 10:33-36 right?
- 📝 Why would a Spanish Catholic priest disapprove of German Catholic texts for Gloria and Sanctus?
- 📝 Can you refer to the Trinity as "Others"
- 📝 What happens to a rejected grace?
- 📝 What Evidence Is There That Saul/Paul Actually Killed Christians?
- 📝 Distributing the bread before consecrating the wine
- 📝 Acording to Orthodox Christianity does God know the future?
- 📝 Latter-day Saint understanding of James 1:13-15, God's omnibenevolence and God's free will?
- 📝 Creation vs Evolution
- 📝 How do Catholics describe "eternal generation"?
- 📝 Is the Dog-Headed icon of Saint Christopher canon in the Orthodox Church?
- 📝 What is a practical Catholic definition of conscience?
- 📝 If Joseph was Jesus's adoptive father then did Jesus really have David's blood?
- 📝 According to SDA understanding did Methuselah preach just before the flood?
- 📝 Why is "We Three Kings" a Christmas hymn, and not a Lenten one?
- 📝 What is the significance of the names of the 4 rivers in the Garden of Eden?
- 📝 Life of Jesus from the age of 12 to 30?
- 📝 Any traditional Vigil celebration on Holy Thursday?
- 📝 How much variation is in the Hebrew language of the Old Testament?
- 📝 How does LDS doctrine reconcile monotheism with men becoming gods?
- 📝 How does Pope Benedict XVI reconcile conscience and authority?
- 📝 What is the easy and less complicated definition of predestination [Calvinism]?
- 📝 According to Catholicism, to what extent is the spiritual growth of a Christian impaired by his/her lack of devotion to Mary and the Saints?
- 📝 Did King James have any words put into the book of Deuteronomy in the translation of the Bible?
- 📝 What is the difference between the first and second resurrection in the book of Revelation?
- 📝 Why don't we use Yahuah?
- 📝 If the Holy Trinity is defined as three distinct faces, people or persons of God, does this not directly contradict the first commandment?
- 📝 Has anybody ever seen God?
- 📝 What's the difference between the Judgment Seat of Christ and the Great White Throne Judgment?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 What is truly meant when it is said that Holy Scripture is 'inerrant' according to the Catholic Church?
- 📝 When Jesus gave Peter his name (rock) what is the significance that he then said upon a ‘different’ kind of rock he would build his church?
- 📝 When a person is described as a Davidide, what is being said about that person?
- 📝 What is the origin of the tradition that priests had a rope tired around them when they went into the Holy of Holies?
- 📝 How do those who cite 2 Tim 3:16 to prove the inspiration of Scripture know that 2 Tim 3:16 is itself inspired and what is meant by "All Scripture"?
- 📝 What did Jesus mean when he said ‘Go and sin no more’ if sinlessness is impossible?
- 📝 What evidence is there to support the position that the Bible is truly the Word of God to mankind?
- 📝 What exactly did Jesus mean when He said "I am coming soon" and similar phrases?
- 📝 What did Jesus mean when He said we must "eat His flesh and drink His blood"?
- 📝 What did God mean when He said 'lest they live forever'?
- 📝 What does it mean that all scripture is God-Breathed?
- 📝 What is the basis of the view that Jesus was separated from the Father and Holy Spirit upon death?
- 📝 According to Protestants following the Reformation, what did Jesus mean when he said "do this and you will live"?
- 📝 What is the basis for saying that the Gospel of Thomas was accepted as scripture by early Christians?
- 📝 What does it mean that Jesus, Father, and Holy Spirit are of the same nature but different personas?
- 📝 What is the evidence that someone is filled with the Holy Spirit?
- 📝 What is the "veil" that covers the heart when the Old Testament is read?
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the belief that people do not go to heaven or hell immediately when they die?
- 📝 What is the Holy See and when is it appropriate to use this term?
- 📝 When was it first said in Christianity by a Church Father that heretics must be tortured physically?
- 📝 What do the Nicene, Apostles, Chalcedonian, Creeds add to the concept of God, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost that is not found directly in the Bible?
- 📝 Since when have JWs said that United Nations will launch an attack on religion?
- 📝 How did theologians conclude that blasphemy of the Holy Spirit meant a refusal for repentance?
- 📝 What does Jesus mean when He says that we should be like children?
- 📝 Where in Scripture is the Holy Spirit said to be speaking directly?
- 📝 What is the extra value of the body of Christ in the Eucharist when someone is already full of the Holy Spirit?
- 📝 What is the Biblical basis for the idea that the Holy Spirit will sometimes choose not to lead?
- 📝 What attributes does Jesus have from an LDS doctrinal perspective that are different from the Jesus in the Holy Trinity?
- 📝 What does "give that which is holy to dogs" mean?
- 📝 What does the Nicene Creed mean when it says that the Father and the Son are of the same substance?