Any radical transformation in case of incarnation without fall?
score:2
Any radical transformation in case of incarnation without fall?
The answer is Yes according to Eastern Church Fathers as they teaches the word Theosis.
Theosis, or divinization ("divinization may also refer to apotheosis, lit. "making divine"), is a transformative process whose aim is likeness to or union with God, as taught by the Eastern Orthodox Church and Eastern Catholic Churches. As a process of transformation, theosis is brought about by the effects of catharsis (purification of mind and body) and theoria ('illumination' with the 'vision' of God). According to Eastern Christian teaching, theosis is very much the purpose of human life. It is considered achievable only through a synergy (or cooperation) between human activity and God's uncreated energies (or operations).[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theosis_(Eastern_Christian_theology)
Adam & Eve have access to the Tree of Life, and the fruit of the Tree of Life is what the Catholic Church believe today as the Holy Eucharist. The transformation, the Catholic Church teaches is a "transfigured bodies" for those who lived a Eucharistic Life.
Saint Albert the Great taught that the Eucharist, the Body and Blood of Christ, is the Fruit of the Tree of Life.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_life
1000 This "how" exceeds our imagination and understanding; it is accessible only to faith. Yet our participation in the Eucharist already gives us a foretaste of Christ's transfiguration of our bodies:
Just as bread that comes from the earth, after God's blessing has been invoked upon it, is no longer ordinary bread, but Eucharist, formed of two things, the one earthly and the other heavenly: so too our bodies, which partake of the Eucharist, are no longer corruptible, but possess the hope of resurrection.556
Question: How it would be possible to lay down one's life for one's friends if there is no death?
If Adam & Eve did not Fall then Jesus would still come as Creation & Incarnation is not a separate plan but a complete plan of God based on the teaching of Blessed John Duns Scotus on the Primacy of Christ. According to Blessed Scotus Jesus will still come not as a Redeemer but King of His creation.
The theology of John Duns Scotus places Christ at the centre of a universe ordered by love. Christ is presented as the basis of all nature, grace and glory – the most perfect model of humanity. He is at the beginning, the centre and the end of the universe.
St. Paul tells us that Christ was the first-born of all creation, and Scotus’ theology makes sense of this affirmation. Scotus did not believe that the acts of creation and Incarnation were separate, but part of one divine plan. So rather than the Incarnation being a sort of “Plan B” to rescue humanity after the fall, in Scotus’ theology it is the whole purpose of creation. Christ is the masterpiece of love in the midst of a creation designed for love, rather than a divine plumber come to fix the mess of original sin. Thus the Incarnation is placed by Scotus in the context of creation and not of human sin. The Primacy of Christ in John Duns Scotus: An Assessment.
Note: I heard somewhere that there would be some transition like this, just without sorrow and pain. Similar to Mary's assumption. How it would look like? Would the person after the transition still be on the Earth?
This is a different scenario on your premise above wherein Adam Eve did not Fall. Mary's Assumptions happened because original sin enters the world. You might probably asking on the appearance of the faithful souls in the New Paradise. The Book of Revelation speaks of a Eucharistic Era, so based on Catholic Church Catechism#1000 souls will be given a foretaste of Christ "transfigured bodies".
In closing,the Primacy of Christ teaches that the Omnipotent God in all eternity knew that Adam & Eve will fall into temptation even the Fall of Lucifer as the Wisdom of God knew everything.
"For the spirit of the Lord fills the world, is all-embracing, and knows whatever is said.(Wisdom1:7)
The Primacy of Christ is the ultimate radical transformation, A Creator transforming into a creature assuming humanity devoid of all powers majesty, but why?
St.Athansius has the answer;
"God becomes man, so that man shall become gods."(St.Athanasius)
Jesus the Begotten Son of God has to come down to show us the Way how to enter His Father's Kingdom, and there's is only one way and the first one who teach the Apostles the Way that Jesus had shown by His life is the Theotokos. The Catholic Church teaches that the Way to Heaven and "transformation" is the Way of the Cross.
As St.Paul boldly exclaimed his own transformation;
"I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me. (Galatians2:20)
Upvote:1
In the hypothesis of Incarnation without sin, it is obvious that the Incarnated Word would not have been rejected, mistreated and killed by people. Not only the passion and death of the Incarnated Word would not have been necessary for the atonement of sins, but also it would not have been even possible, because people in the original state of holiness and justice would have recognized, worshipped and loved Him.
In this hypothetical case, the Word would still have assumed a human nature "for us men, and for our salvation" as the Nicene creed says, understanding salvation not in the negative way of delivering people from hell, but in the positive way of making people "partakers of the divine nature" (2 Peter 1:4), members of the Word and temples of the Holy Spirit, and thus able, when glorified at the end of their time on earth, to see God "as He is" (1 John 3:2), "face to face" (1 Cor 13:12).
To note, the case is not that the Incarnation of the Word is the only way in which God can make people partakers of the divine nature even if they did not sin, but that it is the most fitting way. Just as the case was not that, once people sinned, the loving obedience of the Incarnated Word to God the Father to the point of death on a cross was the only way in which God could forgive people for their sins and make them again partakers of the divine nature, but that it was the most fitting way (Summa Theologica, Part III, Question 46, Articles 1-3) [1].
The notion that the Word assuming a human nature is the most fitting way for God to make people partakers of the divine nature, even if people had not sinned, seems fairly self-evident. It is also evident in several texts from the Church Fathers which refer to the Incarnation as the divine course of action for our theosis without connecting it necessarily with the Passion of the Incarnated Word for the atonement of sins, with some of those texts referred in paragraph 460 of the Catechism [2]. An ancient antiphony of Latin liturgy praises this divine course of action, again without making a necessary connection to the Passion for the atonement of sins, by calling it "wonderful exchange" ("admirabile commercium") [3]. For further reference, there is ample current literature on the subject, from brief [4] to extensive [5].
In this hypothetical scenario, the Incarnated Word would still have given us an example of radical Self-giving to God the Father, even if that Self-giving would not have involved an obedience to the Father to the point of death. Clearly for the Incarnated Word to give Himself to God the Father in loving obedience, and out of that love, to the people whom the Father loves, it is not intrinsically necessary that the Father commands the Word to let people kill Him! Though suffering to the point of death in loving obedience to God is the highest way in which radical self-giving to God may be realized, clearly it is not the only way.
References
[1] http://www.newadvent.org/summa/4046.htm
[2] http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1J.HTM
[3] First antiphon of Vespers and Lauds of the pre-1969 feast of the Octave of the Nativity of the Lord / Circumcision of the Lord, and first antiphon of Vespers of the current feast of St. Mary Mother of God, both feasts on January 1st: "O wonderful exchange: The Creator of the human race, assuming an ensouled body, deigned to be born of a Virgin, and coming forth as a man without intervention of [male] seed, has granted to us his Divinity." ("O admirabile commercium: Creator generis humani, animatum corpus sumens, de Virgine nasci dignatus est, et procedens h*m* sine semine, largitus est nobis suam deitatem.")
[4] E.g. https://www.hprweb.com/2010/12/o-admirabile-commercium-the-true-christmas-exchange/
[5] E.g. https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/o-marvelous-exchange-12607
More post
- 📝 Christ as primordial sacrament
- 📝 When Did Catholics Cease to Fast as the Orthodox Do?
- 📝 According to Calvinism, if Catholicism might lead to salvation, why to remain a Calvinist? (Henry IV story)
- 📝 Did the original reformers believe in a Magisterium?
- 📝 did GOD predestinate all of us?
- 📝 On nominal Christianity
- 📝 Do non-Catholics get protection by confessional seal?
- 📝 Does Jesus ever claim to be God, or the son of God?
- 📝 Anglican Minor Orders?
- 📝 Should a Christian watch horror movies?
- 📝 Why did Jacob insist that Joseph's sons were his?
- 📝 What arguments support the view that Ephesians WAS written by Paul?
- 📝 Are there any statistics that show how many scientists are Christians or otherwise believe in a personal God?
- 📝 Who resurrected Jesus - the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit?
- 📝 Is there a theological distinction between being a "sinner" and being"wicked?"
- 📝 What (if anything) are the differences between God's Will, Commands of Jesus, Ten Commandments?
- 📝 As Christians are we called to convert people who have no Faith in anything or Faith in different religion. Baptist/Methodist
- 📝 What is the biblical basis for the priesthood of all believers?
- 📝 Does the Roman Catholic church consider HIPAA to be an unjust law?
- 📝 What epistemology was used to determine the canon of scripture in the Councils?
- 📝 Legal base for "any male baptized Catholic is eligible to be elected Pope"
- 📝 How is the new anti-conversion law going to affect Christians in India?
- 📝 What service is more 'important' in Orthodox Christianity?
- 📝 Job 39:30 AND Matthew 24:28
- 📝 If "God" is a Trinity, where in the Bible does the word "God" refer to the Trinity?
- 📝 Confusion regarding the son of God
- 📝 If the Bible is open to interpretation, how does one know which one is right?
- 📝 Have any noteworthy church councils denounced Full Preterism as heresy?
- 📝 Why do most Christians not follow the Talmud?
- 📝 Can Christians, in good faith, hold that God is not perfect [i.e. not complete]?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Any radical transformation in case of incarnation without fall?
- 📝 Are there any real statistics on how many people fall away?
- 📝 When scripture quotes a non-biblical source, without any opposition of the source, does it imply any endors*m*nt?
- 📝 Who believes the incarnation and resurrection wouldn't have happened without Mary's faith?
- 📝 Are there any groups of Christians who believe that all loans made with their money should be made without the expectation of repayment?
- 📝 Does any church denomination believe it possible to go one moment without sinning?
- 📝 Are any of the LDS gods without beginning or end, or are they all created at a certain point in time?
- 📝 Does any church believe in Sola Scriptura, but without allowing private interpretation?
- 📝 Are there any theories or traditions for dating how long after creation the Fall of Man occurred?
- 📝 Was there any case of a h*m*sexual priest in the early Church and how did the Church handle that?
- 📝 Have any Christian denominations or high-profile churches publicly presented a theological case against 'vaccine passes' for churches?
- 📝 Did any Early Church Fathers believe that Mary was without sin?
- 📝 Is there any Christian teaching as to where Adam and Eve were sent after their fall from the Garden of Eden?
- 📝 Does any denomination believe that it's not possible to be a Christian full of the Holy Spirit without being eventually led by the HS to join them?
- 📝 Has any prominent theologian ever explained why Jesus let a thief be in charge of the money?
- 📝 Is there any Biblical Basis for 400 years of silence between Old and New Testament?
- 📝 According to Roman Catholic doctrine, why does Mary refer to God as her Savior if she was born without sin?
- 📝 Are there any examples of sarcasm in the bible?
- 📝 What's is the case for premarital sex being an instance of πορνεία (p**neia)?
- 📝 How do theistic evolutionists view the Fall of Man?
- 📝 According to the Catholic Church, are Jews saved without faith in Jesus?
- 📝 Do any Church Fathers directly connect "speaking in tongues" with anything other than existing human languages?
- 📝 Does the Bible give any rules for music?
- 📝 Does the Bible make any allusions to life on other planets?
- 📝 How does the Catholic church explain Matthew 19:9, which seems to allow divorce in case of sexual misconduct?
- 📝 Are any Greek or Roman gods mentioned by name in the Bible?
- 📝 Is there any account of a religious marriage ceremony in the scripture?
- 📝 Is any of Jesus' carpentry still around?
- 📝 Do any major denominations refuse to recognize Holy Baptism in other denominations
- 📝 Is there any sense in being baptized as an adult after being baptized as an infant?