This consciousness turns back; it doesn't go further than name-and-form
Upvote:0
SN 12.65 says:
Bhikkhus, before my enlightenment, while I was still a bodhisatta....
Therefore, the teaching in SN 12.65 is Gotama's preliminary incomplete exploration of Dependent Origination. It is not yet complete Dhamma.
The words 'contact', 'six sense bases', 'mind-&-body' and 'consciousness' here do not have the same meaning as in the complete twelve condition formula because SN 12.65 only traces the real causes of suffering back to craving.
When the above words are used in the twelve condition formula, they have the following meaning, as shown in the case of 'contact':
contact with ignorance: avijjāsamphassajena
SN 22.81
But in SN 12.65, the words 'contact', 'six sense bases', 'mind-&-body' and 'consciousness' do not have the above meaning, namely, as 'tainted by ignorance'. The words are used meta-physically rather than in terms of suffering.
Gotama gets to feeling and asks: "From what does feeling arise?" He answers: "Sense contact" (rather than sense contact with ignorance). Then asks: "From what does contact arise?" and answers "sense bases". Then asks "From what does sense bases arise?" and answers "mind-body". Then asks: "From what does mind-body arise?" and answers "consciousness". For the mind-body to be known there must be consciousness. Then asks: "From what does consciousness arise?" and answers: "mind-body". Because for consciousness to exist, it comes from the mind-body (per SN 22.82; SN 22.56, etc).
Mind and body are the reason why the aggregate of consciousness is found.
Nāmarūpaṃ hetu, nāmarūpaṃ paccayo viññāṇakkhandhassa paññāpanāyā
SN 22.82
In other words, since a "visual form" cannot be known without sense organs, obviously the term "nama-rupa" does not mean the old Brahmanistic "naming-forms" because the sense organs must arise before a form can be experienced & named; as follows:
Dependent on eye & forms, eye-consciousness arises. The meeting of the three is contact. With contact as a requisite condition, there is feeling. What one feels, one perceives (labels/names in the mind). What one perceives, one thinks about.
MN 18
Note: In MN 18 above, the terms 'eye', 'forms' & 'eye-consciousness' are also used meta-physically rather than in terms of suffering. The terms are "neutral". MN 18 is similar to suttas such as MN 38 and MN 148, where sense contact is "neutral" (neither wholesome or unwholesome) and two paths can occur from sense contact, namely, the path to suffering or the path to nibbana.
The people who don't yet understand dhamma; who don't understand the difference between the different Dependent Origination formulas; won't be able to understand this answer.
Upvote:3
In his analysis, Buddha sought to identify the semiotic precursor/counterpart for the experience of death. Going backwards from death, he identified the notion of "life" (jati, the notion of separate organism that gets born and dies) as the precursor/counterpart of death.
Going further backwards, he identified a chain of precursors/counterparts supporting each other in the process of semiotic development. These were appropriating experience aka becoming, object grasping aka goal-setting, obsession aka craving, associating a feeling with object, contact with object, six doors of contact, and namarupa or the labeled objects themselves.
He then tried to identify a precursor or counterpart for namarupa, information about objects and identities. He realized that vijnana or ability to differentiate objects from their background and from each other (the function that gives rise to our basic awareness of the world), is the precursor/counterpart of namarupa.
Naturally, the next step was to try and identify the precursor/counterpart for vijnana (recognition/differentiation). Upon much thinking, Buddha came to conclusion that namarupa itself was the counterpart of vijnana. Indeed, there may be no differentiation of objects without capacity for recognition, and there is no capacity for recognition without notions of objects.
At that moment Buddha realized that the entire chain of phenomena he has been analyzing, including death, is completely included in the realm of objective thinking. In other words, the entire experience of living and dying is a story our object-obsessed mind is telling itself. This realization was a huge breakthrough and a major step in the direction of Enlightenment.
At a later date, Buddha reconsidered this idea that vijnana and namarupa are each other's precursors and instead came up with an alternative chain which had "accumulated tendencies" (samskaras) and "ignorance" as two more links of the chain. This is the version of DO that ended up becoming the classic we know today.
Anyway, the importance of this realization still stands, that all our experienced phenomena are mind-made ("form is emptiness"), and this mind itself is a reflection of interaction of phenomena since beginningless times. In Mahayana we say, phenomena are empty, and mind is empty as well, these two emptinesses are a reflection of each other and yet they manifest as seeming reality ("emptiness is form"). This relationship is an important topic of analytical meditation in Tibetan Mahayana.
More post
- 📝 How to overcome fear of annihilation in meditation and why is it not included in list of hindrances to meditation?
- 📝 Can this question be asked?
- 📝 Sutta Question about 4 ways of debating
- 📝 How to judge progress in vipassana
- 📝 How much is the minimal time for practicing Vipassana in daily life for achieving better mindfulness?
- 📝 What are the requirements for Once-returner?
- 📝 How do you have a relationship
- 📝 What to do when music gets played in the mind
- 📝 Three questions about sensual desire
- 📝 Why is nirvana not mara?
- 📝 How to realise "anatta" of "Nama-rupa"
- 📝 When and how should a layperson declare their achievements?
- 📝 Do all conditioned things arise from ignorance?
- 📝 Ledi Sayadaw's "Anatta Dipani" in English? (And Ledi/Saya Thet relationship)
- 📝 Why and how is Theravada and Mahayana Abhidha(r)(m)ma different?
- 📝 Psychic Powers and the Kevatta Sutta (DN 11)
- 📝 Why do Buddhists cremate instead of burying?
- 📝 How far is attachment allowed?
- 📝 Monastics & Hygiene
- 📝 Does every Buddha have knowledge of the past, present and future?
- 📝 How concentrated is access concentration and how would one recognise it?
- 📝 Serious asthma and meditation, how much should I struggle? Is anxiety at night ok?
- 📝 What is the difference between Anapanasati and Vipassana?
- 📝 Why is "idle speech" one of the ten unwholesome actions?
- 📝 What is Buddhist doctrine on the question of counterfactual definiteness?
- 📝 How would the END look like?
- 📝 Trouble Maintaining Practice
- 📝 Problem solving attitude
- 📝 How important are incense and candles to a meditation practice?
- 📝 Is all property communal for the monks?
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 This consciousness turns back; it doesn't go further than name-and-form
- 📝 How buddha came back to his human consciousness if consciousness and fabrication ceases after release
- 📝 In what form or fashion might it be ethical to "bestow" consciousness on an AI? A question and conversation with ChatGPT:
- 📝 What are the name and content of this Zen Buddhist koan?
- 📝 "Guard the sense doors"- What does this mean, and what is it's application?
- 📝 How and when did the name "Buddhism" appear?
- 📝 Consciousness and Name-Form
- 📝 What is the name in Pāli and Sanskrit for the ‘body scanning’ meditation technique?
- 📝 In a Buddhist perspective how do we recall memories of this life and beyond?
- 📝 Can a human being reside both in this world and Nirvana at the same time?
- 📝 Ajahn Brahm stated that he ate snakes and frogs during his training, does this mean that it is acceptable to kill animals?
- 📝 The noble truths and eight fold path aren't holy than a learner. when a learner becomes a teacher?
- 📝 How can Name-and-form be the cause and condition for the manifestation of the consciousness aggregate?
- 📝 Is this an accurate introduction to different paths and traditions?
- 📝 Which buddhist traditions use silent visual applause, instead of clapping, to show appreciation and what is the origin of this practice?
- 📝 Understanding that Perception and Consciousness are temporary
- 📝 State between Equanimity and 1st or 2nd or further path
- 📝 significance of buddhism in this age of terrorism tyrannies and insolence
- 📝 Which is this sutta, which describes a monk prepared to travel and to experience violence?
- 📝 Why is focusing on the breath more difficult than focusing on Mantras, and how important is it before vipassana?
- 📝 I've always had a feeling that there is more to life and death. Is this normal?
- 📝 Substrate consciousness and Rigpa
- 📝 How can the world's youth discover careers that are aligned with consciousness and Buddhism?
- 📝 When I empty out intentions and relax in meditation, what is this force that moves my body in complex patterns?
- 📝 Searching for this Jataka where a monk is brought to the heaven and hell by The Buddha
- 📝 In the Tirokudda Kanda food and drink are given for dead relatives. Is this a superstitious scripture most likely not uttered by Buddha?
- 📝 As a Buddhist lay-follower is there a need and good form to do good deeds?
- 📝 Why is swastika in buddhism is in this 卍 format and not in this 卐 format? What is the difference between the two? What is the meaning of each sign?
- 📝 Is it possible and good to know and/or talk about other/more details about the way out of suffering than the Buddha did?
- 📝 Considering other traditions than Goenka Vipassana for better Right Effort, Right Concentration and Right Mindfullness