Do modern day Buddhists still believe in the magical siddhis?
score:2
Is it possible for a modern Buddhist to believe in what sounds like fantasy or magical powers (Rddhi) ?
If there is a belief in these things, then there exists conceptual artefacts. I certainly don't believe in them. In Buddhism, if they occur for you, - and they can occur in some quite powerful ways - they can be seen to have only an indicative value, both for personal practice and in how you skilfully integrate with others. Personally, I was plagued by these things, but given the correct attention, they served my practice well.
Do any current day Buddhists practice these?
Off the top of my head, Daniel Ingram is quite vocal about the siddhis. Whilst he is certainly an interesting character, I would find it difficult to recommend many of his practice methods to others for many reasons. For one, he teaches Buddhist practices that are far too powerful and disproportionately off-centre from the eightfold path for the average run-of-the-mill person, and some of those practices can't even be considered Buddhist in nature.
Are the eight classical Siddhis or Rddhi now rejected or reinterpreted ?
They are neither rejected nor reinterpreted. The approach to the siddhis from the suttas tells us two things: 1) to much wrong attention towards the siddhis is not helpful towards the primary task at hand: the ending of suffering. 2) the siddhis are only symptomatic of the primary task at hand. In other words, they are a sign that the radiant mind is opening further.
Then Venerable Anuruddha went up to Venerable Sāriputta, and exchanged greetings with him. When the greetings and polite conversation were over, he sat down to one side and said to him:
“Here’s the thing, Reverend Sāriputta. With clairvoyance that is purified and surpasses the human, I survey the entire galaxy. My energy is roused up and unflagging, my mindfulness is established and lucid, my body is tranquil and undisturbed, and my mind is immersed in samādhi. But my mind is not freed from the defilements by not grasping.”
“Well, Reverend Anuruddha, when you say: ‘With clairvoyance that is purified and surpasses the human, I survey the entire galaxy,’ that’s your conceit. And when you say: ‘My energy is roused up and unflagging, my mindfulness is established and lucid, my body is tranquil and undisturbed, and my mind is immersed in samādhi,’ that’s your restlessness. And when you say: ‘But my mind is not freed from the defilements by not grasping,’ that’s your remorse. It would be good to give up these three things. Instead of focusing on them, apply your mind to the deathless.”
After some time Anuruddha gave up these three things. Instead of focusing on them, he applied his mind to the deathless. Then Anuruddha, living alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute, soon realized the supreme culmination of the spiritual path in this very life. He lived having achieved with his own insight the goal for which gentlemen rightly go forth from the lay life to homelessness.
He understood: “Rebirth is ended; the spiritual journey has been completed; what had to be done has been done; there is no return to any state of existence.” And Venerable Anuruddha became one of the perfected.
Upvote:1
Allow me to point out that the category 'Modern Buddhist' covers 535 million people across hundreds of nations and thousands of cultural groups, ranging from parochial tribal villagers with no formal education to cosmopolitan urbanites with doctoral degrees. I have no doubt that if we went looking we could find a decent number of them who believe in and practice this assortment of paranormal powers.
I mean, heck: I can go into any major city in the US and find a New Age bookstore with people practicing crystal healing, astral-plane travel, angel card divination, and an assortment of other 'magicalish' powers. Why should I doubt that there are Buddhists somewhere trying to levitate themselves?
Upvote:1
There are many groups of people who self-identify as Buddhist.
Some are orthodox dogmatic Buddhists who take the scriptures literally. So, if the scripture talks about supernatural powers then they will accept it literally. Usually they are not interested to obtain these powers, but they will talk about them in a positive way and will colorfully recount how the Buddha and his senior disciple Moggallana used them.
Then there are the New Age people, who may not understand what the Buddha taught but would mix Buddhism with New Age ideas. They may even have Buddha statues, Bodhisattva statues etc. and might practise some kind of mindfulness meditation with scented candles and meditation music. They would accept these supernatural powers as true and may be interested to obtain these powers, but usually it's out of their reach.
Next we have Vajrayana practitioners among whom, some may practise tantra. The tantra practitioners may be interested in supernatural powers.
And then we have Secular Buddhists who discard anything they feel is pseudoscience, and only extract teachings of Buddhism which they see as useful. These people would not believe in those supernatural powers. They may view Buddhist teachings as psychology.
Finally, there are very serious practitioners of Buddhism, the ariya (noble), those seeking the end of suffering. These practitioners are not seeking supernatural powers as they are not important to the ending of suffering. So, whether these supernatural powers are true or not, or attainable or not, is unimportant to them. The Buddha's senior disciple Sariputta, the arahant, did not have any supernatural powers.
More post
- 📝 Getting rid of long discourses from Tipitaka, what could be true intention?
- 📝 What do Buddhists do to prevent sexual desires?
- 📝 Is detachment all about not giving damn to peoples/things?
- 📝 Does feeding animals with dead chicks and live worms break precepts?
- 📝 How to combat self-doubt?
- 📝 First Lay Teachers
- 📝 Where does the Buddha describe suffering as being like a person who is hit by two arrows?
- 📝 Was Buddha had a expected food poisoning?
- 📝 What is the (middle length) sutta, where Buddha exposes a monk, who has an ignorant view of non-self?
- 📝 What are the sets of things in SN 1.44?
- 📝 How come enlightened people don't have any laziness?
- 📝 Can a Bhikkhu yell at or beat a lay person under the vinaya?
- 📝 Need help with finding a specific Sutta
- 📝 Why do Buddhists have children?
- 📝 Is it good to tell awakening stories?
- 📝 Avoiding Back Pain
- 📝 Aren't ahirika and kukkucca contradictory defilements?
- 📝 Looking for Buddhist videos that explain the Buddhist view on consciousness in a clear succinct way
- 📝 Was the Buddha a pessimist?
- 📝 How to get rid of demons or evil spirits?
- 📝 How concentrated is access concentration and how would one recognise it?
- 📝 Mindfulness of the world - its being OK
- 📝 How do you reach Nirvana when you are craving Nirvana?
- 📝 Combining yoga (asanas); qigong meditation and raw vegan diet with Buddhism
- 📝 Virtue of monk and lay ariya
- 📝 Why I can't think in anything while I'm meditating
- 📝 How to keep balance in the thin line between non attachment to reputation and "not caring about anything"
- 📝 Does Sotapanna have the fear of death?
- 📝 What buddhism says about physical reality?
- 📝 Literal translation of Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 Do modern day Buddhists still believe in the magical siddhis?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, despite that he claimed it himself?
- 📝 Did the Buddha visit modern day Assam?
- 📝 Where is the Buddha quoted as saying do not believe anything I say until you can prove it by yourself?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe there is no creator?
- 📝 How concerned should Buddhists be with the actions of others?
- 📝 Do Buddhists believe in gods?
- 📝 What is the recommended time of day for meditation?
- 📝 What would Buddhists do to get rid of the feeling of insecurity in relationships?
- 📝 Maintaining the emotional state achieved in meditation through the rest of the day
- 📝 Should Lay Buddhists Teach the Dhamma?
- 📝 Was the doctrine of 'Anatta', accepted as doctrine by modern Buddhism, actually taught by the Buddha?
- 📝 Is Theravada Buddhism the only modern representative of Hinayana Buddhism?
- 📝 Is the Pali Canon the only canon in modern Buddhism?
- 📝 Can Buddhists see into the future?
- 📝 Does the Buddhist text Alankarabuddhi still exist?
- 📝 Were the oldest Buddhists evangelical?
- 📝 If a substance enhanced the ability to stay mindful, and didnt cause intoxication or carelessness, would it still violate the fifth precept?
- 📝 Mental note of thoughts during the day
- 📝 Should Buddhists use statues with an imagined likeness of the Buddha for veneration?
- 📝 Do modern-day Buddhists take "Mara The Evil One" literally?
- 📝 Do Buddhists believe in Akashic records?
- 📝 Do Buddhists believe (as do some Christians) in non-material forms of healing?
- 📝 Is it possible to believe (incorrectly) that one is on the path?
- 📝 Do Mahayana Buddhists explain birth and extinction in the same way?
- 📝 Why are so many Buddhists in the west hostile to academic analyses of the religion?
- 📝 If I download illegal material for my education and if the material is not in my reach in my country, is it still bad karma?
- 📝 What do Buddhists religious texts say about the environment?
- 📝 What is the attitude of Buddhists to "repulsive animals"?
- 📝 Telepathic Communication, do Buddhists Believe in it?