There is a conventional self, so is anything conventionally permanent?
Upvote:0
There is nothing one should take as self as whatever you take as a self it will case unsatisfactoriness and is not permanent and not in one's control.
A normal worldling will consider conventionally that here is a self and it is permanent and it is satisfactory and it is in one's control. But it is not permanent and not in one's control and is not satisfactory.
Upvote:0
Suffering or unsatisfactoriness is conventionally permanent for the conventional self.
Impermanence is conventionally permanent for the conventional self.
Upvote:1
Whether or not there is the arising of Tathagatas, this property stands — this regularity of the Dhamma, this orderliness of the Dhamma, this this/that conditionality.
Upvote:1
The Buddha mentions three eternalist doctrines that exemplify conventional permanence. Let's skip the first two since they are weaker variations of this third one:
DN28:15.18: Furthermore, some ascetic or brahmin—by dint of keen, resolute, committed, and diligent effort, and right focus—experiences an immersion of the heart of such a kind that they recollect their past lives for as many as forty eons of the expansion and contraction of the cosmos, with features and details. They say, ‘I know that in the past the cosmos expanded or contracted. I don’t know whether in the future the cosmos will expand or contract.
This third conventional doctrine leaps to the following conclusion:
DN28:15.25:The self and the cosmos are eternal, barren, steady as a mountain peak, standing firm like a pillar. They remain the same for all eternity, while these sentient beings wander and transmigrate and pass away and rearise.’ This is the third eternalist doctrine. This is unsurpassable when it comes to eternalist doctrines.
In DN1, the Buddha explains the limitations of these very impressive conventional views:
DN1:1.36.1: The Realized One understands this: ‘If you hold on to and attach to these grounds for views it leads to such and such a destiny in the next life.’
And then the Buddha turns away from convention and goes beyond:
DN1:1.36.3: He understands this, and what goes beyond this. Yet since he does not misapprehend that understanding, he has realized extinguishment within himself. Having truly understood the origin, ending, gratification, drawback, and escape from feelings, the Realized One is freed through not grasping.
To paraphrase, "you can come back as much as you like, but why?"
Arahants and non-returners do not return and are not seen by humans or devas after their body breaks up. Conventional permanence seeks return. That is why it is bound to suffering. Because a vital condition for suffering is rebirth.
SN12.23:4.3: I say that suffering has a vital condition. And what is it? You should say: ‘Rebirth.’
More post
- 📝 Sankhara conditions vinjana dependent origination
- 📝 Did the Buddha talk about karma and sexual misconduct independent of the lay precepts
- 📝 Why is Nibbana referred to as "The destination and the path leading to the destination"?
- 📝 Hair of the Buddha
- 📝 How are Prasangika and Svātantrika different?
- 📝 Why walking meditation is not mentioned in the ways of attending to mindfulness?
- 📝 The Buddha is said to have rediscovered the ancient path. Why was it lost to begin with?
- 📝 What are the occasions did Panchasika or Pansilu meet the Buddha
- 📝 Euthanasia for animals
- 📝 What does "becoming" mean in the phrase "the 10 fetters of becoming"?
- 📝 Attachment to practice itself
- 📝 The pali word for this concept
- 📝 What is difference between anapanasati and kāyagatā Sati?
- 📝 DN 15: Whose or which consciousness enters the mother's womb?
- 📝 Buddha referring to himself
- 📝 Why is meditation making me more angry?
- 📝 How does an ālaya-vijñāna work?
- 📝 What are examples of identity-view?
- 📝 What is the difference between anger and frustration?
- 📝 Meditation, compassion: How to handle people who dominate you in the office?
- 📝 Aversion and Mahayana
- 📝 What is The Prediction as defined by the Mahayana tradition?
- 📝 What distinguishes Japanese Shingon Buddhism from other types?
- 📝 Where do thoughts arise?
- 📝 Are Buddhists hypnotists?
- 📝 Could you translate 'suchness' as "being perceptible to the senses"?
- 📝 In Mahayana Buddhism, do they expect everyone to become a Buddha? If so how can any Buddha help anyone to attain enlightenment?
- 📝 Was the Buddha a vegetarian?
- 📝 Has any Buddhist meditator claimed that the mano-vijnana has a base to differentiate it from the other consciousnesses?
- 📝 Call of duty during a Dharmic war : a Buddhist perspective
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- 📝 There is a conventional self, so is anything conventionally permanent?
- 📝 Is there anything one can do to save the deceased from the consequences of their Kamma?
- 📝 Is there anything like "positive suffering" for Buddhists?
- 📝 If there is no self what or who is it that gets enlightened?
- 📝 If there is no self how can Nirvana be described as bliss?
- 📝 Does the Doctrine of No Soul mean there is nothing permanent to continue?
- 📝 Is there anything akin to 'Jhana' in Zen Buddhism?
- 📝 Is there is anything which is not a phenomena?
- 📝 If there is no Self , what Self is there to be affected by the karma which non-Self now performs?
- 📝 Are there anything to care about in this universe?
- 📝 Do Buddhists claim that if there was a self it could not be annihilated?
- 📝 Why is there no self in the container of the 5 aggregates?
- 📝 What am I doing to my self to make my natural state "I am trapped in pain" (This seems like a must for me and there is nothing I can do about it)
- 📝 Is the conventional self "conventional" in the same way as dharmas are?
- 📝 Is there anything like mahamudra without guru yoga
- 📝 Is there anything in Buddhism analogous to the Christian Eucharist?
- 📝 Is there anything I can read about the Buddhist tradition today?
- 📝 Is there anything else beyond realization of the five skhandas?
- 📝 How do Buddhists who believe in a non momentary conventional self during life account for karma without enlightenment?
- 📝 The Buddha who knew there were 31 realm but didn't mention anything about a round earth
- 📝 Is there a Buddhist term for a lack of self identity?
- 📝 Which Buddhists say that there are no conventionally existent wholes, and for what reasons?
- 📝 Is there anything like discriminating intellect in Buddhism?
- 📝 Why is speaking about the conventional self in this life ok, but speaking about the conventional self in past and future lives forbidden?
- 📝 If there is no soul, how can there be rebirth?
- 📝 Where is the Buddha quoted as saying do not believe anything I say until you can prove it by yourself?
- 📝 Why do Buddhists believe there is no creator?
- 📝 Why isn't there a Buddhist Bible?
- 📝 Are there any living enlightened people?
- 📝 Is there any benefit in learning Pali or Sanskrit?
