Life after death in buddhism
Upvote:1
Hinduism teaches that each person has an immortal soul or self that reincarnates and transmigrates after death. It changes body like a person changing clothes.
As a person sheds worn-out garments and wears new ones, likewise, at the time of death, the soul casts off its worn-out body and enters a new one.
Hindu text BG 2.22
Buddhism teaches that all phenomena is not self (sabbe dhamma anatta) - Dhp 279. Please see this answer for details.
From moment to moment, there is birth, death and (re)birth of chained conditioned processes until final liberation.
The mental idea of the self (that arises from the chained conditioned processes) has renewed existence through transfer of information, as long as craving has not ceased.
The quote below explains this transfer of information using analogies.
The king asked: "Venerable Nagasena, is it so that one does not transmigrate and one is reborn?"
"Yes, your majesty, one does not transmigrate and one is reborn."
"How, venerable Nagasena, is it that one does not transmigrate and one is reborn? Give me an analogy."
"Just as, your majesty, if someone kindled one lamp from another, is it indeed so, your majesty, that the lamp would transmigrate from the other lamp?"
"Certainly not, venerable sir."
"Indeed just so, your majesty, one does not transmigrate and one is reborn."
"Give me another analogy."
"Do you remember, your majesty, when you were a boy learning some verse from a teacher?"
"Yes, venerable sir."
"Your majesty, did this verse transmigrate from the teacher?"
"Certainly not, venerable sir."
"Indeed just so, your majesty, one does not transmigrate and one is reborn."
"You are clever, venerable Nagasena.".
Milindapanha 3.5.5
Upvote:2
One of the most fundamental differences is that Hindus believe in a soul (atman) that passes from one life to a next, like when "you die", "you" will be reborn in heaven. Buddhists know this to be untrue. What dies and what arises is just formation of aggregates which in of themself are products of the flow of karma, not any sort of "self" that is within a soul.
Some later (Mahayanist) Buddhist teachers have tried to mistakenly proport this atman concept, most noticibly asanga, though this is not the Buddhas teachings, Anatta, non self is at the fundamentals of Buddhas teachings and in turn at the fundamental differences between Hindu and Buddhist understandings. Though more often than not the explanations of realms and existences in the cosmology of both sects coincide. So heaven and hell exist in both for eg.
More post
- π What is a pandaka?
- π Is Buddhism a syncretic religion, and then what would they say on the Abrahamaic religions?
- π ΔnΔpΔnasati (mindfulness of breathing) -- concentrate on nose, or on whole body?
- π Forced conversion
- π Which sutta? The Buddha says monks missing out on pleasures of lay life and pleasures of holy life
- π How to deal with people who try to prove your compassion is fake?
- π Anatta a tool or reality?
- π Dilemma about Money
- π Does Vipassana arise from Samatha/Anapanasati meditation? or is it another trap of monkey mind?
- π Is Shakyamuni Buddha Siddhartha Gautama?
- π How did my soul end up in the cycle of samsara?
- π What is breath?
- π Does an Arahant or Buddha still like music they liked as a lay person?
- π Can Buddhists make very eccentric vows?
- π if deities are merely creations of mind,how can there be purelands?
- π Textual reference vs. Direct insight
- π What are the physiological effects of mindfulness based meditation?
- π How to be kind when you don't like people or the world?
- π Shiva's 112 ways to attain enlightenment and Buddha's way
- π Are we Mindful in Jhana?
- π The Four Great References (AN 4.180)
- π Buddhism and miracles
- π Auto-suggestion and buddhism and how to use it
- π Are there reliable accounts of Buddhists who have remembered past lives?
- π Why did the buddha teach the mahayana?
- π Transferring merit to someone living who isnt open minded to receiving it
- π Is a Dhamma follower always a stream entrant?
- π Is nibbana the only next world in reality?
- π Does it make any sense to read the four noble truths parallel to the Buddhaghosa's 4 interpretations of the nidanas
- π Did the Buddha talk about karma and sexual misconduct independent of the lay precepts
Source: stackoverflow.com
Search Posts
Related post
- π Life after death in buddhism
- π Reunion with the loved one after death and in next life
- π Life after death
- π Buddhism after death
- π If Buddhism is about moderation, then why is it that you can attain nirvana only after renouncing worldly possessions?
- π Stages of Life according to Buddhism
- π Realigning your priorities after realizing death and impermanence
- π Is Buddhism life negating?
- π Will Buddhism last only 5,000 years after Buddha's Mahaparinirvana?
- π Is there a concept of after life in Buddhism?
- π How to live life after acknowledging anatta?
- π Life testament, illness and Buddhism
- π At which point after conception does life begin?
- π Vajrayana VS theravada - after death theories - do they contradict each other?
- π Transfering merits to parents after their death
- π What is life like after having achieved nirvana?
- π Life With Death
- π Spirituality of a life from Buddhism
- π Is there a sutta which answers where a nirvanaised consciousnesses is after death and comapres it to a fire going out?
- π Was Buddhism during the life of the Buddha unique in the history of religion per Huston Smith?
- π Is Buddhism life denying or life negative?
- π Does kama have a place in the life of a practitioner after losing kamacchanda?
- π What happens after the death of a fully enlightened being such as Buddha Shakyamuni?
- π Introductory books to Buddhism
- π How to explain what Buddhism is?
- π Role of belief in Buddhism
- π Where does a person go after attaining Nirvana?
- π Disenchanted with Buddhism
- π Why is Buddhism not Nihilism?
- π What is the next meditation type after Mindfulness of Breathing meditation?